CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open
DOI: 10.1055/a-2320-7104
Review

Retention of Endoscopic Capsules in Diverticula: A Literature Review of a Capsule Endoscopy Rarity.

1   Surgical Research Unit, Odense Universitetshospital Kirurgisk Afdeling A, Odense, Denmark (Ringgold ID: RIN573154)
,
Ola Selnes
2   Surgical Research Unit, Odense Universitetshospital Kirurgisk Afdeling A, Odense, Denmark (Ringgold ID: RIN573154)
,
Ian Io Lei
3   University Hospital Coventry, Coventry, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Ringgold ID: RIN156736)
,
Sebastian Schostek
4   Ovesco Endoscopy AG, Tubingen, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN484040)
,
5   Department of Social Medicine & Public Health, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland (Ringgold ID: RIN37805)
6   Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark (Ringgold ID: RIN6174)
7   Department of Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark (Ringgold ID: RIN11286)
› Institutsangaben

Aims: This review aims to provide an updated and comprehensive reviewof capsule retention within diverticula, shedding light on the characteristics and management of this rare event in capsule endoscopy. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across multiple databases. All observational studies that reported capsule retention in a diverticulum among complication and outcomes, as well as case reports and series, were included. Manual cross-checking of references was also performed. Three extractors performed abstract and full-text reviews, as well as data-extraction. Results: We found 167 references from Pubmed, Embase and Web Of Science, 65 duplicates were removed and further 71 references were excluded. Crosschecking of references found additional two articles. In total, 32 articles were included, resulting in a total of 34 cases of retained capsules in diverticula. The median age was 69 and the majority were male (76,5%). The most common retention occurred in Meckel’s diverticulum (32,4%) followed by Zenker’s diverticulum (20,6%). Investigation of capsule retention was done with X-ray (50%) and CT scan (44,1%). 17 cases (50%) were asymptomatic. Resolution of the retention happened with endoscopy (35,3%) and surgical management (32,4%), as well as self-resolution (20,6%). Conclusion: Due to the small number of cases, diverticula are not a risk factor for incomplete capsule endoscopy examination. It affects mainly elderly, male, asymptomatic patients, and are typically diagnosed using X-ray and CT scans. The most common type is Meckel’s diverticulum, and endoscopy was the primary management. Capsule endoscopy retentions are extremely rare, with only 34 cases reported since its introduction.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 01. November 2023

Angenommen nach Revision: 05. April 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
06. Mai 2024

© . The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany