PDF herunterladen
Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Sustainability & Circularity NOW 2024; 01: a23346930
DOI: 10.1055/a-2334-6930
Original Article

Urine as a Biobased Fertilizer: The Netherlands as Case Study

Authors

  • S. Beijer

    1   Van ’t Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, PO box 94157, 1090 GD Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  • S. Das

    2   Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO box 94240, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    3   Pinpoint Laboratories, 40 Te Puke Quarry Rd, Te Puke 3183, New Zealand

  • R. Helmus

    2   Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO box 94240, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  • P. Scheer

    4   SEMiLLA Sanitation, Innovatieweg 4, 7007 CD Doetinchem, The Netherlands

  • B. Jansen

    2   Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, PO box 94240, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  • J. C. Slootweg 

    1   Van ’t Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, PO box 94157, 1090 GD Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Gefördert durch: EU 818309
Weitere Informationen
  Lizenzen und Reprints Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik


Graphical Abstract

Preview

Abstract

Humankind has grown increasingly dependent on mineral fertilizer to feed a growing world population. However, nutrients are rarely recovered and recycled after consumption, leading to environmental waste issues now and potential supply issues in the future. Urine is rich in these nutrients and is therefore a prime candidate as a precursor for biobased fertilizers. This work presents a case study to remove potentially present contaminants from human urine using activated carbon adsorbents to adhere to Dutch fertilizer legislation. In the urine, three pharmaceuticals were identified by target analysis and 11 other contaminants by suspect screening using liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF/MS). These were successfully removed by treatments with both granulated and powdered activated carbon, albeit with a loss of 16–17% and 2–4% of dissolved nutrients, respectively. Further screening of inorganic contaminants and persistent organic pollutants by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and gas chromatography quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometry (GC-Q-Orbitrap/MS) showed that all prerequisites for fertilizer status are met, paving the way for its future legal use as a biobased fertilizer in the Netherlands.

Keywords

Nutrient recycling - Biobased fertilizer - Activated carbon adsorbent - Pharmaceutical removal - Fertilizer legislative framework - Target analysis - Suspect screening

Supporting Information

Primary Data



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 22. April 2024

Angenommen nach Revision: 24. Mai 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
28. Mai 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
01. Juli 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Bibliographical Record
S. Beijer, S. Das, R. Helmus, P. Scheer, B. Jansen, J. C. Slootweg. Urine as a Biobased Fertilizer: The Netherlands as Case Study. Sustainability & Circularity NOW 2024; 01: a23346930.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2334-6930
 

  • References

  • 1 Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P. Molecular Biology of the Cell. Garland Science; New York: 2008
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Garcia-Ruiz R, González de Molina M, Guzmán G, Soto D, Infante-Amate J. J. Sustain. Agric. 2012; 36: 650-682
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Corbridge DE. C. Phosphorus - Chemistry, Biochemistry and Technology. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 2013
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Erisman JW, Sutton MA, Galloway J, Klimont Z, Winiwarter W. Nat. Geosci. 2008; 1: 636-639
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Scholz RW, Roy AH, Hellums DT. in Sustain. Phosphorus Manag. - A Transdiscipl. Roadmap. Eds Scholz RW, Roy H, Brand FS, Hellums DT, Ulrich AE. Springer; Dordrecht: 2014: 1-128
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Galloway JN, Townsend AR, Erisman JW, Bekunda M, Cai Z, Freney JR, Martinelli LA, Seitzinger SP, Sutton MA. Science 2008; 320: 889-892
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Cordell D, Drangert J, White S. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2009; 19: 292-305
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 8 van Kauwenbergh SJ, Stewart M, Mikkelsen R. Better Crop. 2013; 97: 18-20
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Atafar Z, Mesdaghinia A, Nouri J, Homaee M, Yunesian M, Ahmadimoghaddam M, Mahvi AH. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010; 160: 83-89
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Cheraghi M, Lorestani B, Merrikhpour H. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2012; 145: 87-92
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Watson I, van Straaten P, Katz T, Botha L. in Sustain. Phosphorus Manag. - A Transdiscipl. Roadmap. Eds Scholz RW, Roy H, Brand FS, Hellums DT, Ulrich AE. Springer; Dordrecht: 2014: 153-173
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Matassa S, Batstone DJ, Hülsen T, Schnoor J, Verstraete W. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015; 49: 5247-5254
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Mohamed AM. O, Bicer Y. Comput. Aided Chem. Eng. 2021; 50: 373-379
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Rittmann BE, Mayer B, Westerhoff P, Edwards M. Chemosphere 2011; 84: 846-853
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Gustavsson J, Cederberg C, Sonesson U, van Otterdijk R, Meybeck A. Global Food Losses and Food Wastes: Extent, Causes and Prevention. Rome: 2011
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Scherhaufer S, Moates G, Hartikainen H, Waldron K, Obersteiner G. Waste Manag. 2018; 77: 98-113
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 17 . Summary of Joint European Commission—ESPP Webinar on P4 (Phosphorus) Critical Raw Material. 2020
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Van Drecht G, Bouwman AF, Harrison J, Knoop JM. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2009; 23: 1-19
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Beijer S, Slootweg JC. Encycl. Inorg. Bioinorg. Chem. 2021; 1-26
  • 20 Jupp AR, Beijer S, Narain GC, Schipper W, Slootweg JC. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021; 50: 87-101
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Ye Y, Ngo HH, Guo W, Liu Y, Chang SW, Nguyen DD, Liang H, Wang J. Bioresour. Technol. 2018; 268: 749-758
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Esculier F, Le Noë J, Barles S, Billen G, Créno B, Garnier J, Lesavre J, Petit L, Tabuchi JP. J. Hydrol. 2019; 573: 1028-1045
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA. Nature 2009; 461: 472-475
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Biggs R, Carpenter SR, De Vries W, De Wit CA, Folke C, Gerten D, Heinke J, Mace GM, Persson LM, Ramanathan V, Reyers B, Sörlin S. Science 2015; 347: 1259855
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Correll DL. J. Environ. Qual. 1998; 27: 261-266
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Larsen TA, Gujer W. Water Sci. Technol. 1996; 34: 87-94
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Friedler E, Butler D, Alfiya Y. in Source Sep. Decentralization Wastewater Manag.. Eds Larsen TA, Udert KM, Lienert J. IWA Publishing; 2013: 241-257
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Udert KM, Larsen TA, Gujer W. Water Sci. Technol. 2006; 54: 413-420
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Martin TM. P, Esculier F, Levavasseur F, Houot S. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022; 52: 890-936
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Randall DG, Naidoo V. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018; 6: 2627-2635
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Sengupta S, Nawaz T, Beaudry J. Curr. Pollut. Reports 2015; 1: 155-166
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Tarpeh WA, Barazesh JM, Cath TY, Nelson KL. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018; 52: 1453-1460
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Christiaens ME. R, Gildemyn S, Matassa S, Ysebaert T, De Vrieze J, Rabaey K. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017; 51: 13143-13150
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Tarpeh WA, Udert KM, Nelson KL. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017; 51: 2373-2381
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Mutegoa E, Hilonga A, Njau KN. Water Pract. Technol. 2020; 15: 551-570
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Basakcilardan-Kabakci S, Ipekoglu AN, Talini I. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2007; 24: 615-624
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Etter B, Udert K. Gounden T. Valorisation of Urine Nutrients - Vuna Final Project Report. Dübendorf, Switzerland: 2015
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Kafarski P, Talma M. J. Adv. Res. 2018; 13: 101-112
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Landry KA, Boyer TH. Water Res. 2016; 105: 487-495
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Lienert J, Bürki T, Escher BI. Water Sci. Technol. 2007; 56: 87-96
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Mezzelani M, Gorbi S, Regoli F. Mar. Environ. Res. 2018; 140: 41-60
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Zhang R, Sun P, Boyer TH, Zhao L, Huang CH. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015; 49: 3056-3066
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Dodd MC, Zuleeg S, Von Gunten U, Pronk W. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008; 42: 9329-9337
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Zimmermann SG, Wittenwiler M, Hollender J, Krauss M, Ort C, Siegrist H, von Gunten U. Water Res. 2011; 45: 605-617
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Pronk W, Palmquist H, Biebow M, Boller M. Water Res. 2006; 40: 1405-1412
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 46 Reis RY. N, Goulart LA, Mascaro LH, Alves SA. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022; 10: 107859
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 47 Natarajan R, Saikia K, Ponnusamy SK, Rathankumar AK, Rajendran DS, Venkataraman S, Tannani DB, Arvind V, Somanna T, Banerjee K, Mohideen N, Vaidyanathan VK. Chemosphere 2022; 287: 131958
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 48 Almuntashiri A, Hosseinzadeh A, Volpin F, Ali SM, Dorji U, Shon H, Phuntsho S. Chemosphere 2021; 280: 130870
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 49 Köpping I, McArdell CS, Borowska E, Böhler MA, Udert KM. Water Res. X 2020; 9: 100057
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 50 Ilyasoglu G, Kose-mutlu B, Mutlu-salmanli O, Koyuncu I. Chemosphere 2022; 302: 134775
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 51 Srivastava A, Gupta B, Majumder A, Gupta AK, Nimbhorkar SK. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021; 9: 106177
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 52 Delgado NY, Capparelli AL, Marino DJ, Navarro AF, Peñuela GA, Ronco AE. J. Surf. Eng. Mater. Adv. Technol. 2016; 06: 183-200
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 53 Delgado N, Marino D, Capparelli A, Casas-Zapata JC, Navarro A. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022; 10: 107706
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 54 Kim SH, Shon HK, Ngo HH. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2010; 16: 344-349
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 55 Özel Duygan BD, Udert KM, Remmele A, McArdell CS. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021; 166: 105341
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 56 Delgado LF, Charles P, Glucina K, Morlay C. Sci. Total Environ. 2012; 435–436: 509-525
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 57 Kovalova L, Knappe DR. U, Lehnberg K, Kazner C, Hollender J. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013; 20: 3607-3615
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 58 . “GreenPee description webpage” can be found under https://greenpee.nl/en/the-process/
  • 59 . “Semilla Sanitation urine recycling webpage” can be found under https://www.nijhuisindustries.com/news/can-we-drink-tea-from-pee-yes-we-can-change-your-mindset
  • 60 . “Wettenbank overheid. Uitvoeringsregeling Meststoffen wet, Appendix Aa” can be found under https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0018989/2021-02-18#BijlageAa
  • 61 European Commission. “DIRECTIVE 2008/98/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives” can be found under https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/NL/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02008L0098-20180705 2008
  • 62 Commissie Deskundigen Meststoffenwet. Protocol Beoordeling Stoffen Meststoffenwet. Versie 3.2. Wettelijke Onderzoekstaken Natuur & Milieu; Wageningen: 2016
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 63 . “Wettenbank overheid. Uitvoeringsregeling Meststoffen wet, Artikel 5” can be found under https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0019031/2022-06-01#HoofdstukIII_Paragraaf1_Artikel5
  • 64 . “Webpage on Aurin recycled fertilizer by Vuna” can be found under https://vuna.ch/en/aurin-recycling-dunger/
  • 65 Caballero-Casero N, Castro G, Bastiaensen M, Gys C, van Larebeke N, Schoeters G, Covaci A. Chemosphere 2021; 280: 130683
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 66 de Poorter LR. M, van Herwijnen R, Janssen PJ. C. M, Smit CE. RIVM Rapp. 2015-0057. 2015
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 67 Hansler RJ, van Herwijnen R, Posthumus R. Indicatieve milieukwaliteitsnormen voor prioritaire stoffen 2004, RIVM Report 601782012/2008. 2008
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 68 . “Legal concentrations of substances” can be found under https://rvszoeksysteem.rivm.nl/Stoffen
  • 69 Bischel HN, Özel Duygan BD, Strande L, McArdell CS, Udert KM, Kohn T. Water Res. 2015; 85: 57-65
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 70 Kovalova L, Siegrist H, Von Gunten U, Eugster J, Hagenbuch M, Wittmer A, Moser R, McArdell CS. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013; 47: 7899-7908
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 71 Avdeef A, Berger CM, Brownell C. Pharm. Res. 2000; 17: 85-89
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 72 Lee SH, Kim KH, Lee M, Lee BD. J. Water Process Eng. 2019; 31: 100828
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 73 . “drugbank webpage on N-acetylsulfamethoxazole” can be found under https://go.drugbank.com/metabolites/DBMET00017
  • 74 . “GreenPee Webpage” can be found under https://greenpee.nl/
  • 75 . “Fertiflow Add Green Webpage” can be found under http://www.fertiflow.eu/nl/additieven/fertiflow-add-green
  • 76 Kovalova L, Siegrist H, Singer H, Wittmer A, McArdell CS. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012; 46: 1536-1545
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 77 Hernández F, Ibáñez M, Botero-Coy AM, Bade R, Bustos-López MC, Rincón J, Moncayo A, Bijlsma L. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015; 407: 6405-6416
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 78 Narain-Ford DM, van Wezel AP, Helmus R, Dekker SC, Bartholomeus RP. Water Res. 2022; 226: 119303
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 79 Das S, Helmus R, Dong Y, Beijer S, Praetorius A, Parsons JR, Jansen B. Chemosphere 2023; 337: 139261
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 80 Helmus R, ter Laak TL, van Wezel AP, de Voogt P, Schymanski EL. J. Cheminform. 2021; 13: 1-25
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 81 Röst HL, Sachsenberg T, Aiche S, Bielow C, Weisser H, Aicheler F, Andreotti S, Ehrlich HC, Gutenbrunner P, Kenar E, Liang X, Nahnsen S, Nilse L, Pfeuffer J, Rosenberger G, Rurik M, Schmitt U, Veit J, Walzer M, Wojnar D, Wolski WE, Schilling O, Choudhary JS, Malmström L, Aebersold R, Reinert K, Kohlbacher O. Nat. Methods 2016; 13: 741-748
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 82 Broeckling CD, Afsar FA, Neumann S, Ben-Hur A, Prenni JE. Anal. Chem. 2014; 86: 6812-6817
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 83 Helmus R, van de Velde B, Brunner AM, ter Laak TL, van Wezel AP, Schymanski EL. J. Open Source Softw. 2022; 7: 4029
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 84 Dulio V. “NORMAN priority list 2017” can be found under https://zenodo.org/record/2624273
  • 85 Neumann S. “mzR GitHub repository” can be found under https://github.com/sneumann/mzR
  • 86 Meringer M, Reinker S, Zhang J, Muller A. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2011; 65: 259-290
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 87 Ruttkies C, Schymanski EL, Wolf S, Hollender J, Neumann S. J. Cheminform. 2016; 8: 1-16
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 88 Schymanski EL, Kondić T, Neumann S, Thiessen PA, Zhang J, Bolton EE. J. Cheminform. 2021; 13: 1-15
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 89 Schymanski EL, Jeon J, Gulde R, Fenner K, Ruff M, Singer HP, Hollender J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014; 48: 2097-2098
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 90 . “MassBank Europe Webpage” can be found under https://massbank.eu/MassBank/
  • 91 . “MassBank of North America Webpage” can be found under https://mona.fiehnlab.ucdavis.edu/
  • 92 De Nicolò A, Cantù M, D’Avolio A. Bioanalysis 2017; 9: 1093-1105
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 93 Mailler R, Gasperi J, Coquet Y, Deshayes S, Zedek S, Cren-Olivé C, Cartiser N, Eudes V, Bressy A, Caupos E, Moilleron R, Chebbo G, Rocher V. Water Res. 2015; 72: 315-330
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 94 Cao Y, Nakhjiri AT, Ghadiri M. Sci. Rep. 2021; 11: 1-11
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 95 Larasati A, Fowler GD, Graham NJ. D. Chemosphere 2022; 286: 131888
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 96 Li Q, Qi Y, Gao C. J. Clean. Prod. 2015; 86: 424-431
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 97 Marques SC. R, Marcuzzo JM, Baldan MR, Mestre AS, Carvalho AP. Chem. Eng. J. 2017; 321: 233-244
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 98 Xiang W, Zhang X, Chen J, Zou W, He F, Hu X, Tsang DC. W, Ok YS, Gao B. Chemosphere 2020; 252: 126539
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 99 Krahn KM, Cornelissen G, Castro G, Arp HP. H, Asimakopoulos AG, Wolf R, Holmstad R, Zimmerman AR, Sørmo E. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023; 445: 130449
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 100 Wang L, Liu J, Liu J, Shi L, Wang Z. Chem. Ecol. 2018; 34: 108-125
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 101 Kuklenyik Z, Ekong J, Cutchins CD, Needham LL, Calafat AM. Anal. Chem. 2003; 75: 6820-6825
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 102 Xu X, He Z, Tang H, Sun Y, Zhang S, Shi D, Ji F. Chemosphere 2022; 288: 132317
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 103 Milbrath MO. G, Wenger Y, Chang CW. C. W, Emond C, Garabrant D, Gillespie BW, Jolliet O. Environ. Health Perspect. 2009; 117: 417-425
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 104 Han Y, Liu W, Lei R, Wang M, Xue Y. Chemosphere 2022; 303: 134995
    Suche in Google Scholar