Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2386-7843
Exploring the incidence of dysplasia or adenocarcinoma in early onset Barrett’s esophagus
Supported by: Catharina onderzoeksfonds
Abstract
Background Currently data on the risk of progression to and lifetime risk of cancer are not available for patients with young onset Barrett’s esophagus (BE). Our aim was to obtain epidemiologic data on the incidence of dysplasia or adenocarcinoma in young onset BE in the Netherlands by collecting data on all histologically confirmed cases over a prolonged period of 25 years between January 1, 1991 and December 31, 2015.
Methods Data were obtained from the Dutch National Pathology Registry. Patients were included if there was a suspicion of BE visualized in the esophagus during the endoscopic examination in combination with a concordant histologic diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia.
Results 231 patients with early onset BE were identified (median age 26 years [range 0–29 years]), with 17 progressing to dysplasia (6 prevalent and 11 incident). For the patients with incident dysplasia, the median surveillance time between the diagnosis of early onset BE and diagnosis of dysplasia was 5 years (range 0–16 years). The incidence rate of dysplasia was 7.3 per 1000 person-years. There were three patients who developed adenocarcinoma (1 prevalent and 2 incident), who were diagnosed at ages 28, 35, and 36 years. The incidence rate of adenocarcinoma was 1.3 per 1000 person-years.
Conclusions In this 25-year period, 231 patients were diagnosed with early onset BE in the Netherlands, with 17 patients progressing to dysplasia and three developing adenocarcinoma. This corresponded to incidence rates of 7.3 per 1000 person-years for dysplasia and 1.3 per 1000 person-years for adenocarcinoma.
Publication History
Received: 19 October 2023
Accepted after revision: 24 May 2024
Article published online:
23 September 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Sharma P, McQuaid K, Dent J. et al. A critical review of the diagnosis and management of Barrett’s esophagus: the AGA Chicago Workshop. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 310-330
- 2 Wang KK, Sampliner RE. Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Updated guidelines 2008 for the diagnosis, surveillance and therapy of Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 788-797
- 3 Casparie M, Tiebosch ATMG, Burger G. et al. Pathology databanking and biobanking in The Netherlands, a central role for PALGA, the nationwide histopathology and cytopathology data network and archive. Cell Oncol 2007; 29: 19-24
- 4 Shaheen NJ, Richter JE. Barrett’s oesophagus. Lancet 2009; 373: 850-861
- 5 Roumans CAM, van der Bogt RD, Steyerberg EW. et al. Adherence to recommendations of Barrett’s esophagus surveillance guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 17-28
- 6 Dutch Association of Gastroenterologists. [Richtlijn Barrett’s oesofagus; 2018 (in Dutch)]. Accessed August 12, 2024 at: https://richtlijnendatabase.nl/gerelateerde_documenten/f/19315/Richtlijn%20Barrett-Oesofagus.pdf
- 7 Ronkainen J, Aro P, Storskrubb T. et al. Prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus in the general population: an endoscopic study. Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 1825-1831
- 8 Rex DK, Cummings OW, Shaw M. et al. Screening for Barrett’s esophagus in colonoscopy patients with and without heartburn. Gastroenterology 2003; 125: 1670-1677
- 9 Anderson LA, Cantwell MM, Watson RGP. et al. The association between alcohol and reflux esophagitis, Barrett’s esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 799-805
- 10 Cook MB, Wild CP, Forman D. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the sex ratio for Barrett’s esophagus, erosive reflux disease, and nonerosive reflux disease. Am J Epidemiol 2005; 162: 1050-1061
- 11 Edelstein ZR, Bronner MP, Rosen SN. et al. Risk factors for Barrett’s esophagus among patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a community clinic-based case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 834-842
- 12 Eisen GM, Sandler RS, Murray S. et al. The relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications with Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92: 27-31
- 13 Corley DA, Kubo A, Levin TR. et al. Race, ethnicity, sex and temporal differences in Barrett’s oesophagus diagnosis: a large community-based study, 1994–2006. Gut 2009; 58: 182-188
- 14 Levine DS, Haggitt RC, Blount PL. et al. An endoscopic biopsy protocol can differentiate high-grade dysplasia from early adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 1993; 105: 40-50
- 15 Sikkema M, de Jonge PJF, Steyerberg EW. et al. Risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma and mortality in patients with Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 235-244
- 16 Sikkema M, Looman CWN, Steyerberg EW. et al. Predictors for neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett’s Esophagus: a prospective cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 1231-1238
- 17 Weusten BLAM, Bisschops R, Dinis-Ribeiro M. et al. Diagnosis and management of Barrett esophagus: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2023; 55: 1124-1146
- 18 Dutch Central Buro of Statistics. . Accessed August 12, 2024 at: https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/nl
- 19 Casparie M, Tiebosch AT, Burger G. et al. Pathology databanking and biobanking in The Netherlands, a central role for PALGA, the nationwide histopathology and cytopathology data network and archive. Cell Oncology 2007; 29: 19-24
- 20 Fitzgerald RC, di Pietro M, Ragunath K. et al. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut 2014; 63: 7-42
- 21 Klaver E, Bureo Gonzalez A, Mostafavi N. et al. Barrett’s esophagus surveillance in a prospective Dutch multi-center community-based cohort of 985 patients demonstrates low risk of neoplastic progression. United European Gastroenterol J 2021; 9: 929-937
- 22 Roumans CAM, Zellenrath PA, Steyerberg EW. et al. Sex differences in neoplastic progression in Barrett’s esophagus: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14: 3240
- 23 IKNL and the NCR. Accessed August 12, 2024 at: https://iknl.nl/nkr-cijfers