Download PDF
Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a24010777
DOI: 10.1055/a-2401-0777
Editorial

Surveillance colonoscopy after resection of large polyps: Can we reduce loss to follow up?

Authors

  • Deepak Madhu 

    1   Gastroenterology, Caritas Hospital, Kottayam, India (Ringgold ID: RIN81485)

  • Keith Siau 

    2   Gastroenterology, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Ringgold ID: RIN8028)
Further Information
Also available at
  Permissions and Reprints
Preview

Keywords

Endoscopy Lower GI Tract - Polyps / adenomas / ... - Colorectal cancer - CRC screening - Endoscopic resection (polypectomy, ESD, EMRc, ...) - Quality and logistical aspects - Quality management


Publication History

Received: 29 July 2024

Accepted: 06 August 2024

Article published online:
29 January 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Refers to:

Patient adherence to surveillance colonoscopy after endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps and factors associated with loss to follow-upEndosc Int Open 2025; 13(CP):
DOI: 10.1055/a-2409-4916

Bibliographical Record
Deepak Madhu, Keith Siau. Surveillance colonoscopy after resection of large polyps: Can we reduce loss to follow up?. Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a24010777.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2401-0777
 

  • References

  • 1 Atkin W, Wooldrage K, Brenner A. et al. Adenoma surveillance and colorectal cancer incidence: a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18: 823-834
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Belderbos TDG, Leenders M, Moons LMG. et al. Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 388-402
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Anderson R, Burr NE, Valori R. Causes of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers based on World Endoscopy Organization System of Analysis. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 1287-1299.e2
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Hassan C, Antonelli G, Dumonceau J-M. et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2020. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 687-700
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Djinbachian R, Dubé A-J, Durand M. et al. Adherence to post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 673-683
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Wu W, Huang J, Yang Y. et al. Adherence to colonoscopy in cascade screening of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 37: 620-631
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Farooq A, BaniFawwaz B, Mian A. et al. Patient adherence to surveillance colonoscopy after endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps and factors associated with loss to follow-up.Endosc Int Open 2024 (online ahead of print).
  • 8 Pimentel-Nunes P, Libânio D, Bastiaansen BAJ. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal lesions: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2022. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 591-622
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Mahmud N, Doshi SD, Coniglio MS. et al. An automated text message navigation program improves the show rate for outpatient colonoscopy. Health Educ Behav 2019; 46: 942-946
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Makaroff KE, Shergill J, Lauzon M. et al. Patient Preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests in light of lowering the screening age to 45 years. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21: 520-531.e10
    Search in Google Scholar