Fortschritte in der SPECT/CT Bildgebung für Anwendungen in der Nuklearkardiologie: Weg zur absoluten Quantifizierung

Zusammenfassung

Die Nuklearkardiologie war ein wesentlicher Treiber für Innovationen in der SPECT, etwa durch die Einführung variabler Kamerageometrien, der 3D-iterativen Rekonstruktion, patientenspezifischer Korrekturen und der CT-Koppelung. Diese Fortschritte ermöglichten das Calcium-Scoring und quantitative Auswertungen und eröffnen Perspektiven für die Bestimmung des myokardialen Blutflusses und der koronaren Flussreserve – trotz der nichtlinearen Eigenschaften von ^99mTc-Tracern. KI-Methoden bieten Unterstützung, beruhen aber letztendlich nur auf Wahrscheinlichkeitsmathematik. Neue Detektoren und höhere Rechenleistung versprechen weiteren Fortschritt.

Abstract

Nuclear cardiology has been a key driver of innovations in SPECT, such as variable camera geometries, 3D iterative reconstruction, patient-specific corrections, and CT integration. This enables Ca-scoring, quantitative evaluation, and opens perspectives for MBF and CFR – despite the nonlinear properties of ^99mTc tracers. AI methods offer support but are based on merely probability mathematics. New detectors and increased computing power promise further progress.

Schlüsselwörter

Nuklearkardiologie - SPECT/CT - Quantifizierung

Keywords

Nuclear cardiology - SPECT/CT - quantification

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
08. Dezember 2025

• Literaturverzeichnis

• 1 Bourque JM, Beller GA. Nuclear Cardiology: The Past, Present, and Future. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging 2024; 17: e016875
• 2 Anger HO. Nuclear Medicine Pioneer, 1920–2005. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology 2005; 33: 250-253
• 3 Vija AH, Desh V. 2005. US Patent No. 6950494.
• 4 Vija AH. 2009. United States Patent No. 7473900.
• 5 Roemer W, Reichel N, Vija AH. et al. Isotropic reconstruction of SPECT data using OSEM3D: Correlation with CT. Academic Radiology 2006; 13: 496-502
• 6 Ghadri JR, Fiechter M, Veraguth K. et al. Coronary Calcium Score as an Adjunct to Nuclear Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Risk Stratification Before Noncardiac Surgery. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2012; 53: 1081-6
• 7 Nayfeh M, Sayed A, Alwan M. et al. Hybrid Imaging: Calcium Score and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 2024; 54: 638-47
• 8 Wei G-Q, Qian J, Chen EQ. et al. Variable-length correlation method for motion correction in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. United States; 2002, Patent Number: 6473636.
• 9 Eisner RL, Noever T, Nowak D. et al. Use of Cross-Correlation Function to Detect Patient Motion during SPECT Imaging. J Nucl Med 1987; 28: 97-101
• 10 Zeintl J, Linke R, Platsch G. et al. First Experience with SMARTZOOM Collimation in Clinical Cardiac SPECT. Proc. Annual Congress of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, Barcelona, Spain, 2009.
• 11 Rajaram R, Bhattacharya M, Ding X. et al. 2011. Tomographic Performance Characteristics of the IQ•SPECT System. IEEE Medical Imaging Conference Record. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6152666
• 12 Lyon MC, Foster C, Ding X. et al. Dose reduction in half-time myocardial perfusion SPECT-CT with multifocal collimation. J Nucl Cardiol 2016; 23: 657-67
• 13 Nakajima K, Okuda K, Momose M. et al. IQ.SPECT technology and its clinical applications using multicenter normal databases. Annals of nuclear medicine 2017; 31: 649-59
• 14 Zeintl J, Vija AH, Yahil A. et al. Quantitative Accuracy of Clinical 99mTc SPECT/CT Using Ordered-Subset Expectation Maximization with 3-Dimensional Resolution Recovery, Attenuation, and Scatter Correction. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2010; 51: 921-8
• 15 Ritt P, Vija H, Hornegger J. et al. Absolute quantification in SPECT. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2011; 38: S69-S77
• 16 Okuda K, Hasegawa D, Kamiya T. et al. Multicenter Study of Quantitative SPECT: Reproducibility of (99m)Tc Quantitation Using a Conjugated-Gradient Minimization Reconstruction Algorithm. J Nucl Med Technol 2021; 49: 138-142
• 17 Shinohara H, Hashimoto T. An Error Evaluation of Iterative Image Reconstruction Methods Using Chi-Square (χ2) Statistic Minimization for Poisson-Distributed Projection Data. Igaku Butsuri 2018; 38: 113-128
• 18 Vija AH. Characteristics of the xSPECT reconstruction method. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Molecular Imaging. 2017. https://www.siemens-healthineers.com/en-us/molecular-imaging/mi-clinical-corner/whitepapers
• 19 Vija AH. Introduction to the xSPECT Technology: Evolving Multi Modal SPECT to Become Context Based and Quantitative. White Paper, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Molecular Imaging. 2013. https://www.siemens-healthineers.com/en-us/molecular-imaging/mi-clinical-corner/whitepapers
• 20 Vija AH, von Gall C, Ghosh P. Accurate, Reproducible and Standardized Quantification, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Molecular Imaging. 2015. https://www.siemens-healthineers.com/en-us/molecular-imaging/mi-clinical-corner/whitepapers
• 21 Nakajima K, Shibutani T, Massanes F. et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging with retrospective gating and integrated correction of attenuation, scatter, respiration, motion, and arrhythmia. J. Nucl. Cardiol 2023; 30: 2773-2789
• 22 Yahil A, Vidal NV. The Velocity Distribution of Galaxies in Clusters. The Astrophysical Journal 1977; 214: 347-50
• 23 Vija AH, Massanes F, Ding X. et al. 2021. Optimizing gated SPECT with retrospective list mode gating. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2021; 62: 1523
• 24 Nakajima K, Shibutani T, Massanes F. et al. Application of list-mode based retrospective gating in patients with and without arrhythmia for myocardial perfusion SPECT. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2022; 63: 3329
• 25 Bhattacharya M. 2018. US Patent No. 9867581.
• 26 Bhattacharya M. 2018. US Patent No. 9910162.
• 27 Massanes F, Vija A, Ding X. et al. New multi-focal collimator designed for quantitative SPECT imaging in nuclear cardiology applications. Journal of Nuclear Med 2021; 62: 1224
• 28 Massanes-Basi F, Vija AH. Improving resolution of myocardial perfusion imaging with multifocal collimation on SymbiPro.specta SPECT/CT. Journal of Nuclear Med 2025; 66: 252016
• 29 Sanders JC, Ritt P, Kuwert T. et al. Fully Automated Data-Driven Respiratory Signal Extraction from SPECT Images Using Laplacian Eigenmaps.. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2016; 35: 2425-2435
• 30 Caobelli F, Wild D, Vija AH. et al. xSPECT-based myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: feasibility of myocardial uptake quantitation in patients with suspected coronary artery disease – a pilot study. Journal of Nuclear Med 2022; 63: 3374
• 31 Ogino Y, Horiguchi Y, Ueda T. et al. A myocardial perfusion imaging system using a multifocal collimator for detecting coronary artery disease: validation with invasive coronary angiography. Annals of nuclear medicine 2015; 29: 366-70
• 32 Caobelli F, Kaiser SR, Thackeray JT. et al. IQ SPECT Allows a Significant Reduction in Administered Dose and Acquisition Time for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Evidence from a Phantom Study. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2014; 55: 2064-70
• 33 Radon J. On the determination of functions from their integral values along certain manifolds. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 1986; 5: 170-6
• 34 Reymann MP, Vija AH, Maier A. Method for comparison of data driven gating algorithms in emission tomography. Physics in Medicine & Biology 2023; 68: 185024
• 35 Reymann MP, Massanes F, Kuwert T. et al. Effect of High-Uptake Regions with Inconsistent Motion on Data Driven Respiratory Gating in SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging using Digital Phantoms. Annual Congress of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine October 15–19, 2022 Barcelona, Spain. 2022; 1–751.
• 36 Cachovan M, Vija AH. 2019. US Patent No. 10304219.
• 37 Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V. et al. Standardized Myocardial Segmentation and Nomenclature for Tomographic Imaging of the Heart. J NucI Cardiol 2002; 9: 240-5
• 38 Naghavi M, Falk E, Hecht H. et al. From Vulnerable Plaque to Vulnerable Patient—Part III: Executive Summary of the Screening for Heart Attack Prevention and Education (SHAPE) Task Force Report. The American Journal of Cardiology 2006; 98: 2-15
• 39 Shaw LJ. Impact of Ischemia Burden on Outcomes in COURAGE Trial Nuclear Substudy. Circulation 2008; 117: 2430-7
• 40 Betancur J. Deep Learning for Prediction of Cardiac Events from Perfusion Imaging. JACC Cardiovascular Imaging 2018; 11: 691-9
• 41 Garcia EV, Slomka P, Moody JB. et al. Quantitative Clinical Nuclear Cardiology, Part 1: Established Applications. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication. Society of Nuclear Medicine 2019; 60: 1507-16
• 42 Dorbala S, Ananthasubramaniam K, Armstrong IS. et al. Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guidelines: Instrumentation, Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation. J Nucl Cardiol 2018; 25: 1784-1846
• 43 Stone GW. ISCHEMIA Trial - International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches. New England Journal of Medicine 2020; 382: 1395-407
• 44 Cerqueira MD. 2021 ACC/AHA/ASNC Appropriate Use Criteria for Radionuclide Imaging. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2021; 77: 596-618
• 45 Slomka PJ, Moody JB, Miller RJH. et al. Quantitative clinical nuclear cardiology, part 2: Evolving/emerging applications. J Nucl Med 2021; 62: 168-176
• 46 Kalantari F, Mohseninia N, Wetsch A. et al. Head-to-Head Comparison of CZT-SPECT and SPECT/CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement and Diagnostic Performance. Life 2023; 13: 1879
• 47 Miller RJH, Barrett O, Shanbhag A. et al. AI-Enhanced SPECT Quantification. Integrating perfusion with AI-derived coronary calcium on CT attenuation scans to improve selection of low-risk studies for stress-only SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2025; 10: 102482
• 48 Bergeron DE, Cessna JT, Golas DB. et al. Dose calibrator manufacturer-dependent bias in assays of 123I. Applied Radiation and isotopes 2014; 90: 79-83