Pelvic venous disorders in women – diagnosis and therapy

Abstract

Chronic pelvic pain may cause a significant reduction in the quality of life for affected women, and the extent of the limitation is often underestimated. Chronic pain can lead to lifelong problems. Currently, PCS is probably significantly underdiagnosed as a cause of chronic pelvic pain in women. To diagnose PCS, other common causes of chronic pelvic pain must be excluded and typical changes in pelvic vein syndrome must be detected, ideally using MR phlebography. If the indication is correct and the procedure is carried out appropriately – ideally by experienced interventionalists certified according to DeGIR/EBIR – the symptoms can be eliminated in the long term with a high success rate and few complications. Simultaneous psychotherapeutic treatment should always be discussed with the patients.

Key Points

• PCS is a common cause of chronic pelvic pain in women.

• Imaging requires Doppler sonography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.

• Typical symptoms and dilated pelvic veins (>8 mm) indicate interventional therapy.

• Pathological pelvic veins are embolized using coils and alcohol foam.

• Published success rates and long-term results suggest propagating interventional therapy.

Citation Format

• Paulus T, Minko P, Petersen T et al. Pelvic venous disorders in women – diagnosis and therapy. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; DOI 10.1055/a-2446-0749

Keywords

pelvic venous disorder - chronic pelvic pain in females - embolization - coils - interventional radiology - macrogol lauryl ether

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 13. Juli 2024

Angenommen nach Revision: 02. Oktober 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
20. November 2024

• References

• 1 Speer LM, Mushkbar S, Erbele T. Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women. Am Fam Physician 2016; 93 (05) 380-387
• 2 Borghi C, Dell'Atti L. Pelvic congestion syndrome: the current state of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016; 293 (02) 291-301
• 3 Dwight T. Varicocele in the Female. The Boston Medical and Surgical Journal 1877; 96 (07) 185-187
• 4 Emerson H. Reliability of Statements of Cause of Death from the Clinical and Pathological Viewpoints. Am J Public Health 1916; 6 (07) 680-685
• 5 Bałabuszek K, Toborek M, Pietura R. Comprehensive overview of the venous disorder known as pelvic congestion syndrome. Annals of Medicine 2022; 54 (01) 22-36
• 6 Topolanski-Sierra R. Pelvic phlebography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1958; 76 (01) 44-52
• 7 Geburtshilfe, D.G.f.P.F.u. Chronischer Unterbauchschmerz der Frau – Leitlinie der Entwicklungsstufe 2k (AWMF-Registernr.: 016–001). Version 5.0 November 2022 (abgerufen 16.03.2024).
• 8 Bundesärztekammer (BÄK), K.B.K. Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftli- and c.M.F. (AWMF), Nationale Versorgungleitlinie chronische KHK, Version 6.0. 2022 (cited: 2024-03-16).
• 9 Osman AM, Mordi A, Khattab R. Female pelvic congestion syndrome: how can CT and MRI help in the management decision?. Br J Radiol 2021; 94 (1118) 20200881
• 10 Phillips D. et al. Pelvic congestion syndrome: etiology of pain, diagnosis, and clinical management. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014; 25 (05) 725-733
• 11 Mahmoud O. et al. Efficacy of endovascular treatment for pelvic congestion syndrome. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2016; 4 (03) 355-370
• 12 Venbrux AC, Lambert DL. Embolization of the ovarian veins as a treatment for patients with chronic pelvic pain caused by pelvic venous incompetence (pelvic congestion syndrome). Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1999; 11 (04) 395-399
• 13 Champaneria R. et al. The relationship between pelvic vein incompetence and chronic pelvic pain in women: systematic reviews of diagnosis and treatment effectiveness. Health Technol Assess 2016; 20 (05) 1-108
• 14 Koo S, Fan C-M. Pelvic congestion syndrome and pelvic varicosities. Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology 2014; 17 (02) 90-95
• 15 Soysal ME. et al. A randomized controlled trial of goserelin and medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of pelvic congestion. Human reproduction 2001; 16 (05) 931-939
• 16 Chung MH, Huh CY. Comparison of treatments for pelvic congestion syndrome. Tohoku J Exp Med 2003; 201 (03) 131-138
• 17 Gavrilov SG. et al. Comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of endovascular and endoscopic interventions on the gonadal veins in the treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2021; 9 (01) 178-186
• 18 Mahnken AH. et al. CIRSE clinical practice manual. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology 2021; 44: 1323-1353
• 19 Practice Guidelines for Central Venous Access 2020: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access*. Anesthesiology 2020; 132 (01) 8-43
• 20 Lopez AJ. Female pelvic vein embolization: indications, techniques, and outcomes. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology 2015; 38 (04) 806-820
• 21 Hamoodi I, Hawthorn R, Moss JG. Can ovarian vein embolization cause more harm than good?. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2015; 41 (12) 1995-1997
• 22 Hanna J. et al. Efficacy of embolotherapy for the treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome: A systematic review. Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971-) 2024; 1-11
• 23 Cheong YC, Smotra G, de C Williams AC. Non-surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014; (03)
• 24 Leonardi M. et al. Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021; (12)
• 25 Daniels J. et al. Laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation for alleviating chronic pelvic pain: a randomized controlled trial. Jama 2009; 302 (09) 955-961
• 26 Kashef E. et al. Pelvic venous congestion syndrome: female venous congestive syndromes and endovascular treatment options. CVIR endovascular 2023; 6 (01) 25