Application of EUS or MRCP prior to ERCP in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis in clinical practice

Abstract

Background and study aims Patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis can be stratified according to the 2019 European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline into low-, intermediate- and high-likelihood groups for presence of choledocholithiasis. For the intermediate group, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is recommended to assess whether an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is necessary prior to cholecystectomy. The aim of the study was to investigate adherence to the guideline for diagnostic and treatment strategy for cholelithiasis in daily clinical practice.

Patients and methods A multicenter, retrospective cross-sectional observational study of the diagnostic pathway of patients with suspicion of choledocholithiasis was conducted between 2019 and 2021. Patients were stratified according to the ESGE guideline "Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones”.

Results A total of 305 patients were included in the analysis and stratified into low- (17%), intermediate- (40%) and high- (43%) likelihood of choledocholithiasis. In these three categories, 182 patients (60%) underwent ERCP. Adherence to the ESGE guideline recommendation was 59.7% overall and was the highest in the intermediate-likelihood group (83.6%), compared with 45.1% in the low- and 43.2% in the high-likelihood group, respectively (P < 0.001). In the high-likelihood group, 49% underwent additional imaging. In 195 patients who underwent additional imaging, 55 ERCPs (28.2%) could be avoided.

Conclusions This study shows that stratification according to the ESGE guideline is useful to reduce the number of unnecessary additional imaging procedures and ERCPs in patients with a suspicion of choledocholithiasis. It seems worthwhile to perform EUS prior to ERCP in the same session.

Keywords

Pancreatobiliary (ERCP/PTCD) - Stones - Endoscopic ultrasonography - Biliary tract - Quality and logistical aspects - Performance and complications - ERC topics

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 17. Oktober 2024

Angenommen nach Revision: 14. November 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
18. November 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
07. Januar 2025

• References

• 1 European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of gallstones. J Hepatol 2016; 65: 146-181
• 2 Stinton LM, Myers RP, Shaffer EA. Epidemiology of gallstones. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2010; 39: 157-169
• 3 Copelan A, Kapoor BS. Choledocholithiasis: Diagnosis and management. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 18: 244-255
• 4 Pioche M, Ponchon T. Management of bile duct leaks. J Visc Surg 2013; 150: S33-S38
• 5 Manes G, Paspatis G, Aabakken L. et al. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 472-491
• 6 Akshintala VS, Kanthasamy K, Bhullar FA. et al. Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 145 randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98: 1-6 e12
• 7 Buxbaum JL, Fehmi SMA, Sultan S. et al. ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 1075-1105 e1015
• 8 Jagtap N, Kumar JK, Chavan R. et al. EUS versus MRCP to perform ERCP in patients with intermediate likelihood of choledocholithiasis: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2022;
• 9 Meeralam Y, Al-Shammari K, Yaghoobi M. Diagnostic accuracy of EUS compared with MRCP in detecting choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy in head-to-head studies. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86: 986-993
• 10 Fusaroli P, Lisotti A. EUS and ERCP in the same session for biliary stones: From risk stratification to treatment strategy in different clinical conditions. Medicina 2021; 57: 1019
• 11 Katsinelos P, Lazaraki G, Chatzimavroudis G. et al. Risk factors for therapeutic ERCP-related complications: an analysis of 2,715 cases performed by a single endoscopist. Ann Gastroenterol 2014; 27: 65-72
• 12 Sperna Weiland CJ, Verschoor EC, Poen AC. et al. Suspected common bile duct stones: reduction of unnecessary ERCP by pre-procedural imaging and timing of ERCP. Surg Endosc 2022;
• 13 World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013; 310: 2191-2194
• 14 Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M. et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007; 370: 1453-1457
• 15 Gurusamy KS, Giljaca V, Takwoingi Y. et al. Ultrasound versus liver function tests for diagnosis of common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1996; 2015
• 16 Kiriyama S, Kozaka K, Takada T. et al. Tokyo guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholangitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2018; 25: 17-30
• 17 Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C. et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013; 62: 102-111
• 18 Ansari D, Torén W, Lindberg S. et al. Diagnosis and management of duodenal perforations: a narrative review. ScandJ Gastroenterol 2019; 54: 939-944
• 19 Dindo D. The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications. Treatment of postoperative complications after digestive surgery 2014; 2014: 13-17
• 20 Lugtenberg M, Burgers JS, Besters CF. et al. Perceived barriers to guideline adherence: a survey among general practitioners. BMC Fam Pract 2011; 12: 98
• 21 Tunruttanakul S, Chareonsil B, Verasmith K. et al. Evaluation of the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2019 and the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines' performances for choledocholithiasis prediction in clinically suspected patients: A retrospective cohort study. JGH Open 2022; 6: 434-440
• 22 Sugiura R, Nakamura H, Horita S. et al. Assessment of postoperative common bile duct stones after endoscopic extraction and subsequent cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2022; 36: 6535-6542
• 23 Spataro J, Tolaymat M, Kistler CA. et al. Prevalence and risk factors for choledocholithiasis after cholecystectomy: 72. Am J Gastroenterol 2017; 112: S32-S33
• 24 World Health Organization. WHO European regional obesity report 2022. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2022.
• 25 Brahee DD, Ogedegbe C, Hassler C. et al. Body mass index and abdominal ultrasound image quality: a pilot survey of sonographers. J Diagn Med Sonogr 2013; 29: 66-72
• 26 Parra-Landazury NM, Cordova-Gallardo J, Mendez-Sanchez N. Obesity and gallstones. Visc Med 2021; 37: 394-402
• 27 Maruta A, Iwashita T, Uemura S. et al. Efficacy of the endoscopic ultrasound-first approach in patients with suspected common bile duct stone to avoid unnecessary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Intern Med 2019; 58: 1673-1679
• 28 Tazuma S. Gallstone disease: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and classification of biliary stones (common bile duct and intrahepatic). Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 20: 1075-1083
• 29 Cummings LC, Liang C, Mascha EJ. et al. Incidence of sedation-related adverse events during ERCP with anesthesia assistance: a multicenter observational study. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96: 269-281 e261
• 30 Johnson G, Webster G, Boškoski I. et al. Curriculum for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) position statement. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 1071-1087