Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a25003748
DOI: 10.1055/a-2500-3748
Original article

Endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia using blue light imaging in a low-risk population: Multicenter cross-sectional validation study

1   Gastroenterology Department, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, Porto, Portugal (Ringgold ID: RIN59035)
,
Gianluca Esposito
2   Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
,
Emanuele Dilaghi
2   Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
,
Guido Manfredi
3   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Maggiore Hospital Crema, Crema, Italy
,
Saverio Alicante
3   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Maggiore Hospital Crema, Crema, Italy
,
Elisabetta Buscarini
3   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Maggiore Hospital Crema, Crema, Italy
,
Bruno Annibale
2   Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
,
Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
1   Gastroenterology Department, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, Porto, Portugal (Ringgold ID: RIN59035)
4   Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center & RISE@CI-IPO, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal (Ringgold ID: RIN18550)
› Author Affiliations
Clinical Trial: Registration number (trial ID): NCT04768218, Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/), Type of Study: Multi-center, cross-sectional study
Preview

Abstract

Background study aims

Detecting gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) with white light endoscopy (WLE) remains a challenge and virtual chromoendoscopy methods have been shown to increase accuracy. We aimed to externally validate the Endoscopic Grading of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia (EGGIM) using blue light imaging (BLI).

Methods

First, the reliability of BLI and the EGGIM score was evaluated through assessment of 90 images divided into three sets of 30. A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted at two Italian centers involving 102 patients (510 biopsies). Both per-biopsy and per-patient analyses were performed to ascertain accuracy of BLI in detecting and staging GIM (vs. histology).

Results

BLI significantly enhanced interobserver agreement of endoscopic diagnosis of GIM, with a Fleiss Kappa of 0.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3–0.5), compared to 0.2 (95% CI 0.2–0.3) with WLE. Concordance was particularly strong in applying the EGGIM score (weighted Kappa 0.7; 95% CI 0.5–0.9). BLI showed significant improvements in sensitivity over WLE, with an increase observed in both per-biopsy analysis (82%; 95%CI 73.7–89.0 vs. 50%;95% CI 40.6–60.3) and per-patient analysis (96%; 95% CI 84.5–99.4 vs. 68%;95% CI 52.4-81.4). The area under the curve of EGGIM in diagnosing OLGIM III/IV was 0.9 (95% CI 0.8–1.0), confirming EGGIM > 4 being the optimal threshold (sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 88%).

Conclusions

Our study validates BLI integrated with the EGGIM system as an effective strategy, highlighting its precision in identifying advanced GIM stages. BLI's notable sensitivity enhances its use as a complementary tool to WLE, significantly improving gastric cancer risk assessment.



Publication History

Received: 18 June 2024

Accepted after revision: 03 December 2024

Article published online:
29 January 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Bibliographical Record
Marta Rodriguez-Carrasco, Gianluca Esposito, Emanuele Dilaghi, Guido Manfredi, Saverio Alicante, Elisabetta Buscarini, Bruno Annibale, Mário Dinis-Ribeiro. Endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia using blue light imaging in a low-risk population: Multicenter cross-sectional validation study. Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a25003748.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2500-3748
 
  • References

  • 1 Correa P, Haenszel W, Cuello C. et al. A model for gastric cancer epidemiology. Lancet 1975; 2: 58-60
  • 2 Capelle LG, de Vries AC, Haringsma J. et al. The staging of gastritis with the OLGA system by using intestinal metaplasia as an accurate alternative for atrophic gastritis. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 1150-1158
  • 3 Pimentel-Nunes P, Libanio D, Marcos-Pinto R. et al. Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS II): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED) guideline update 2019. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 365-388
  • 4 Ang TL, Pittayanon R, Lau JY. et al. A multicenter randomized comparison between high-definition white light endoscopy and narrow band imaging for detection of gastric lesions. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 27: 1473-1478
  • 5 Panteris V, Nikolopoulou S, Lountou A. et al. Diagnostic capabilities of high-definition white light endoscopy for the diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia and correlation with histologic and clinical data. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 26: 594-601
  • 6 Pimentel-Nunes P, Libanio D, Lage J. et al. A multicenter prospective study of the real-time use of narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of premalignant gastric conditions and lesions. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 723-730
  • 7 Rodriguez-Carrasco M, Esposito G, Libanio D. et al. Image-enhanced endoscopy for gastric preneoplastic conditions and neoplastic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 1048-1065
  • 8 Esposito G, Pimentel-Nunes P, Angeletti S. et al. Endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia (EGGIM): a multicenter validation study. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 515-521
  • 9 Chen H, Liu Y, Lu Y. et al. Ability of blue laser imaging with magnifying endoscopy for the diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia. Lasers Med Sci 2018; 33: 1757-1762
  • 10 Chen H, Wu X, Liu Y. et al. Blue laser imaging with acetic acid enhancement improved the detection rate of gastric intestinal metaplasia. Lasers Med Sci 2019; 34: 555-559
  • 11 Kimura-Tsuchiya R, Dohi O, Fujita Y. et al. Magnifying endoscopy with blue laser imaging improves the microstructure visualization in early gastric cancer: Comparison of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2017; 2017: 8303046
  • 12 Dohi O, Yagi N, Yoshida S. et al. Magnifying blue laser imaging versus magnifying narrow-band imaging for the diagnosis of early gastric cancer: A prospective, multicenter, comparative study. Digestion 2017; 96: 127-134
  • 13 Dohi O, Yagi N, Naito Y. et al. Blue laser imaging-bright improves the real-time detection rate of early gastric cancer: a randomized controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 47-57
  • 14 Dohi O, Yagi N, Majima A. et al. Diagnostic ability of magnifying endoscopy with blue laser imaging for early gastric cancer: a prospective study. Gastric Cancer 2017; 20: 297-303
  • 15 Takayama S, Dohi O, Naito Y. et al. Diagnostic ability of magnifying blue light imaging with a light emitting diode light source for early gastric cancer: A prospective comparative study. Digestion 2021; 102: 580-589
  • 16 Castro R, Rodriguez M, Libanio D. et al. Reliability and accuracy of blue light imaging for staging of intestinal metaplasia in the stomach. Scand J Gastroenterol 2019; 54: 1301-1305
  • 17 von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M. et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg 2014; 12: 1495-1499
  • 18 Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Soares JB. et al. A multicenter validation of an endoscopic classification with narrow band imaging for gastric precancerous and cancerous lesions. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 236-246
  • 19 Uedo N, Yao K. Endoluminal diagnosis of early gastric cancer and its precursors: bridging the gap between endoscopy and pathology. Adv Exp Med Biol 2016; 908: 293-316
  • 20 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-174
  • 21 Altayar O, Davitkov P, Shah SC. et al. AGA Technical Review on Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia-Epidemiology and Risk Factors. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 732-744 e716
  • 22 Hooi JKY, Lai WY, Ng WK. et al. Global Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology 2017; 153: 420-429
  • 23 Castro R, Esposito G, Libanio D. et al. A single vial is enough in the absence of endoscopic suspected intestinal metaplasia – less is more!. Scand J Gastroenterol 2019; 54: 673-677
  • 24 Dilaghi E, Esposito G, Pivetta G. et al. Endoscopic diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia in patients with autoimmune gastritis using narrow-band imaging: does pseudopyloric metaplasia muddy the waters?. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10: E434-E440
  • 25 Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H. et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2024; 74: 229-263