Optimal Strategies for the Management of Macromastia and Breast Ptosis for Patients Undergoing Nipple-sparing Mastectomy

Abstract

High-volume breasts pose challenges for nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) due to their large size, indistinct tissue boundaries, and high degree of ptosis. Historically, NSM was not considered feasible for such cases, but advancements in surgical techniques have expanded eligibility criteria.

We developed a surgical algorithm for patients with macromastia and ptosis undergoing NSM. We also outline techniques for preserving the nipple–areolar complex (NAC) based on the severity of macromastia and breast ptosis, especially when immediate mastopexy/reduction is required during mastectomy. The proposed algorithm provides a practical guide for surgeons managing these complex cases.

By employing carefully selected approaches, it is possible to successfully preserve the NAC in high-volume breasts undergoing NSM. This broader eligibility criteria not only accommodates a more diverse patient population but also enhances their quality of life and improves aesthetic outcomes.

Advancements in surgical techniques have made NSM a viable option for breast reconstruction in high-volume breasts. By addressing challenges and preserving the NAC through carefully selected approaches, surgeons can improve outcomes and quality of life for patients undergoing NSM.

Keywords

breast reconstruction - implant-based breast reconstruction - breast reconstruction in large and ptotic breasts

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 10. April 2024

Angenommen: 23. Dezember 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
13. Februar 2025

• References

• 1 Salgarello M, Visconti G, Barone-Adesi L. Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction: cosmetic outcomes and technical refinements. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (05) 1460-1471
• 2 Aliotta RE, Scomacao I, Duraes EFR. et al. Pushing the envelope: skin-only mastopexy in single-stage nipple-sparing mastectomy with direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147 (01) 38-45
• 3 Salibian AA, Frey JD, Karp NS, Choi M. Does staged breast reduction before nipple-sparing mastectomy decrease complications? A matched cohort study between staged and nonstaged techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (05) 1023-1032
• 4 Awaida CJ, Bernier C, Bou-Merhi JS. et al. Staged mastopexy before nipple-sparing mastectomy: improving safety and appearance in implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 153 (05) 864e-872e
• 5 Mirza HN, Berlin NL, Sugg KB, Chen JS, Chung KC, Momoh AO. The impact of timing of delayed autologous breast reconstruction following postmastectomy radiation therapy on postoperative morbidity. J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40 (04) 318-328
• 6 Smith BL, Coopey SB. Nipple-sparing mastectomy. Adv Surg 2018; 52 (01) 113-126
• 7 Coopey SB, Mitchell SD. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: pitfalls and challenges. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 24 (10) 2863-2868
• 8 Coopey SB, Tang R, Lei L. et al. Increasing eligibility for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20 (10) 3218-3222
• 9 Rancati AO, Nahabedian MY, Angrigiani C. et al. Revascularization of the nipple-areola complex following nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 151 (02) 254-262
• 10 Dietz J, Fedele G. Skin reduction nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22 (10) 3404
• 11 Spear SL, Mathis R, Albino FP, Pittman TA. The inframammary approach to nipple-sparing mastectomy: the Georgetown University Hospital experience. In: Harness J, Willey S. eds. Operative Approaches to Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. 2017. Cham: Springer;
• 12 Pontell ME, Saad N, Brown A, Rose M, Ashinoff R, Saad A. Single stage nipple-sparing mastectomy and reduction mastopexy in the ptotic breast. Plast Surg Int 2018; 2018: 9205805
• 13 Daar DA, Abdou SA, Rosario L. et al. Is there a preferred incision location for nipple-sparing mastectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (05) 906e-919e
• 14 Pagliara D, Schiavone L, Garganese G. et al. Predicting mastectomy skin flap necrosis: a systematic review of preoperative and intraoperative assessment techniques. Clin Breast Cancer 2023; 23 (03) 249-254
• 15 Wang F, Alvarado M, Ewing C, Esserman L, Foster R, Sbitany H. The impact of breast mass on outcomes of total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate tissue expander-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (03) 672-679
• 16 Koulermou G. The use of the three-pedicle dermal flap in preventing mastectomy for large and/or ptotic breasts: a novel concept to prevent NAC survival in two stages reconstruction. Arch Surg Oncol 2017; 3: 1
• 17 Mulvihill L, Lee CD, England H, Moreira A. SP18. Safety of same-day discharge after mastectomy with implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2023; 11 (05) 131-132
• 18 Temple-Oberle C, Shea-Budgell MA, Tan M. et al; ERAS Society. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in breast reconstruction: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (05) 1056e-1071e
• 19 Gahm J, Ljung Konstantinidou A, Lagergren J. et al. Effectiveness of single vs multiple doses of prophylactic intravenous antibiotics in implant-based breast reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5 (09) e2231583
• 20 Clayton JL, Bazakas A, Lee CN, Hultman CS, Halvorson EG. Once is not enough: withholding postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in prosthetic breast reconstruction is associated with an increased risk of infection. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (03) 495-502
• 21 Houvenaeghel G, Cohen M, Dammacco MA. et al; MAPAMc trial group. Prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: results of a French prospective trial. Br J Surg 2021; 108 (03) 296-301
• 22 Mitchell SD, Willey SC, Beitsch P, Feldman S. Evidence based outcomes of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Nipple Sparing Mastectomy Registry. Gland Surg 2018; 7 (03) 247-257
• 23 Tousimis E, Haslinger M. Overview of indications for nipple sparing mastectomy. Gland Surg 2018; 7 (03) 288-300
• 24 Jensen JA, Orringer JS, Giuliano AE. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in 99 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18 (06) 1665-1670
• 25 Kracoff-Sella SL, Allweis TM, Bokov I. et al. Tumor-to-nipple distance in selecting patients for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (07) e2963
• 26 Colwell AS, Tessler O, Lin AM. et al. Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: predictors of complications, reconstruction outcomes, and 5-year trends. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (03) 496-506
• 27 Matsen CB, Mehrara B, Eaton A. et al. Skin flap necrosis after mastectomy with reconstruction: a prospective study. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23 (01) 257-264
• 28 Frey JD, Salibian AA, Karp NS, Choi M. The impact of mastectomy weight on reconstructive trends and outcomes in nipple-sparing mastectomy: progressively greater complications with larger breast size. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (06) 795e-804e
• 29 Chirappapha P, Petit JY, Rietjens M. et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy: does breast morphological factor related to necrotic complications?. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2014; 2 (01) e99
• 30 Tondu T, Thiessen F, Hubens G, Tjalma W, Blondeel P, Verhoeven V. Delayed two-stage nipple sparing mastectomy and simultaneous expander-to-implant reconstruction of the large and ptotic breast. Gland Surg 2022; 11 (03) 524-534
• 31 DellaCroce FJ, Blum CA, Sullivan SK. et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy and ptosis: perforator flap breast reconstruction allows full secondary mastopexy with complete nipple areolar repositioning. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (01) 1e-9e
• 32 Davies K, Allan L, Roblin P, Ross D, Farhadi J. Factors affecting post-operative complications following skin sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Breast 2011; 20 (01) 21-25
• 33 Dent BL, Small K, Swistel A, Talmor M. Nipple-areolar complex ischemia after nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction: risk factors and the success of conservative treatment. Aesthet Surg J 2014; 34 (04) 560-570
• 34 Algaithy ZK, Petit JY, Lohsiriwat V. et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy: can we predict the factors predisposing to necrosis?. Eur J Surg Oncol 2012; 38 (02) 125-129
• 35 Metere A, Fabiani E, Lonardo MT, Giannotti D, Pace D, Giacomelli L. Nipple-sparing mastectomy long-term outcomes: early and late complications. Medicina (Kaunas) 2020; 56 (04) 166
• 36 de Alcantara Filho P, Capko D, Barry JM, Morrow M, Pusic A, Sacchini VS. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18 (11) 3117-3122
• 37 Damsgaard TE, Rønning H. Indocyanine green guided mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2019; 8 (Suppl. 04) S287-S290
• 38 Wang CY, Wang CH, Tzeng YS. et al. Intraoperative assessment of the relationship between nipple circulation and incision site in nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 80 (2S, Suppl 1): S59-S65
• 39 Wapnir I, Dua M, Kieryn A. et al. Intraoperative imaging of nipple perfusion patterns and ischemic complications in nipple-sparing mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21 (01) 100-106
• 40 Mastronardi M, Fracon S, Scomersi S, Fezzi M, Bortul M. Role of qualitative and quantitative indocyanine green angiography to assess mastectomy skin flaps perfusion in nipple/skin-sparing and skin-reducing mastectomies with implant-based breast reconstruction. Breast J 2022; 2022: 5142100