RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/a-2558-6754
Outcomes and complications of biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction: National prospective study
Authors
Gefördert durch: Midlands Gastroenterological Society
Gefördert durch: Pancreatic Cancer UK

Abstract
Background and study aims
National data suggest that biliary drainage for malignant obstruction is associated with high complication rates and early mortality. This study examined factors associated with poor outcomes.
Patients and methods
RICOCHET was a national, prospective audit of patients with pancreatic cancer or malignant biliary obstruction between April and August 2018. This analysis reviewed outcomes including complications within 7 days and 30-day mortality following biliary drainage and associated factors.
Results
Biliary drainage was attempted in 773 patients, of which, 78.7% were successful at first attempt; but if unsuccessful, only 37% of subsequent attempts succeeded. Complications occurred following 11% of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs) (including pancreatitis, 5%) and 12% of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainages (PTBDs) (including cholangitis, 8%). Complications were associated with: potentially resectable cancer (odds ratio [OR] 1.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23–3.03); more than one biliary drainage attempt (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.04–2.74); cholangiocarcinoma (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.20–4.05), or radiological cancer diagnosis (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.13–3.60). Thirty-day mortality rates following ERCP and PTBD were 21.4% and 21.4%, respectively, in unresectable cancer and 6% and 6.3%, respectively, in potentially resectable cancer. Increased 30-day mortality in patients with unresectable disease was associated with a performance status of 2 or more (HR 3.14 (1.65–5.97)). Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher in patients with unresectable cancer if a multidisciplinary team meeting had not reviewed and advised drainage prior to the procedure 50% vs 20.4% (P = 0.028).
Conclusions
Careful multidisciplinary consideration of risks and potential benefits should be undertaken prior to attempting malignant biliary drainage due to the high risk of complications and early mortality.
Keywords
Cholangiopancreatography Endoscopic Retrograde - Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage - Cholangiopancreatography - Endoscopic Retrograde/adverse effects - Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage/complications - MortalityPublikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 02. Januar 2025
Angenommen: 05. März 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. Juli 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
Philip R Harvey, Richard RJ Wilkin, Shahd A. Mohamed, Sarah Powell-Brett, Siobhan C McKay, Georgia R Layton, Keith Roberts, Nigel Trudgill. Outcomes and complications of biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction: National prospective study. Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a25586754.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2558-6754
-
References
- 1
Andriulli A,
Loperfido S,
Napolitano G.
et al.
Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies.
Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 1781-8
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 2
Kochar B,
Akshintala VS,
Afghani E.
et al.
Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review
by using randomized, controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 143-149.e9
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 3
Rees J,
Mytton J,
Evison F.
et al.
The outcomes of biliary drainage by percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography for
the palliation of malignant biliary obstruction in England between 2001 and 2014:
a
retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2020; 10: e033576
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 4
Bodger K,
Bowering K,
Sarkar S.
et al.
All-cause mortality after first ERCP in England: clinically guided analysis of hospital
episode statistics with linkage to registry of death. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74:
825-833
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 5
Harvey PR,
Baldwin S,
Mytton J.
et al.
Higher volume providers are associated with improved outcomes following ERCP for
the palliation of malignant biliary obstruction. EClinicalMedicine 2020; 18: 100212
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 6
Müller PC,
Hodson J,
Kuemmerli C.
et al.
Effect of time to surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 405: 293-302
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 7
Pande R,
Hodson J,
Marudanayagam R.
et al.
Survival advantage of upfront surgery for pancreatic head cancer without
preoperative biliary drainage. Front Oncol 2020; 10: 526514
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 8
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
NICE guideline [NG85] Pancreatic cancer in adults: diagnosis and management. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng85
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 9
RICHOCET Study group, West Midlands Research Collaborative.
Receipt of Curative Resection or Palliative Care for Hepatopancreaticobiliary Tumours
(RICOCHET): Protocol for a nationwide collaborative observational study. JMIR Res
Protoc 2019; 8
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 10
Harris PA,
Taylor R,
Thielke R.
et al.
Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow
process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform
2009; 42: 377-381
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 11
Harris PA,
Taylor R,
Minor BL.
et al.
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.
J Biomed Inform 2019; 95
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 12
Department of Health.
The NHS Cancer plan; a plan for investment, a plan for reform. London, UK: Department
of health; 2000.
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 13
Banks PA,
Bollen TL,
Dervenis C.
et al.
Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification
and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013; 62: 102-111
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 14
Khwaja A.
KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract 2012;
120: c179-c184
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 15
NHS Health Research Authority.
Is my study research?. https://www.hra-decisiontools.org.uk/ethics/
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 16
Cotton PB,
Garrow DA,
Gallagher J.
et al.
Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures
over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 80-88
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 17
Johnson KD,
Perisetti A,
Tharian B.
et al.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complications and their management
strategies: A "scoping" literature review. Dig Dis Sci 2020; 65: 361-375
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 18
Cotton PB,
Lehman G,
Vennes J.
et al.
Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.
Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 383-393
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 19
Banks PA,
Bollen TL,
Dervenis C.
et al.
Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification
and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013; 62: 102-111
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 20
Driver RJ,
Handforth C,
Radhakrishna G.
et al.
The Glasgow Prognostic Score at the time of palliative esophageal stent insertion
is a predictive factor of 30-day mortality and overall survival. J Clin Gastroenterol
2018; 52: 223-228
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 21
Van der Gaag NA,
Rauws EAJ,
van Eijck CHJ.
et al.
Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med
2010; 362: 129-137
Reference Ris Wihthout Link