Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · AJP Rep 2025; 15(02): e53-e57
DOI: 10.1055/a-2562-1607
Case Report

Di-Cavitary Twin Pregnancy in Didelphys Uterus with Associated Renal Agenesis

Helen Woolcock Martinez   *
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
,
Noora Haghighi   *
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
,
Whitney A. Booker 
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
› Author Affiliations
Funding Whitney A. Booker was funded through the 5KL2TR001874-08 grant.
› Further Information
Also available at
  Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction

A didelphys uterus is a rare Müllerian duct anomaly (MDA) caused by the incomplete fusion of the Müllerian ducts, leading to the formation of two distinct uterine cavities. The occurrence of simultaneous twin pregnancies, with each fetus developing in a separate horn of a didelphys uterus, is estimated at approximately 1 in 1,000,000 cases. This case report describes a rare instance of a spontaneous dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy, with one fetus in each horn of a didelphys uterus.

Case Description

This is the case of a 35-year-old woman with unilateral renal agenesis who presented with a spontaneous dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy, with one fetus in each uterine cavity. This patient's pregnancy complications included intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and rising creatinine levels, leading to a planned cesarean delivery at 36 weeks. The delivery was complicated by intrapartum hemorrhage and the postpartum course was further complicated by sepsis and endometritis.

Conclusion

This case highlights the complexity of managing a dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy in a didelphys uterus with concomitant congenital unilateral renal agenesis. It contributes to the understanding of optimal management strategies for MDA presentations and highlights the necessity for ongoing research into complications and long-term outcomes associated with such anomalies.

Keywords

twin pregnancy - uterus didelphys - Müllerian duct anomaly - renal agenesis

* Both authors contributed equally to this manuscript.




Publication History

Received: 19 December 2024

Accepted: 08 January 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
19 March 2025

Article published online:
10 April 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, Bontis JN, Devroey P. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7 (02) 161-174
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Al Yaqoubi HN, Fatema N. Successful vaginal delivery of naturally conceived dicavitary twin in didelphys uterus: a rare reported case. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2017; 2017: 7279548
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Boehnke M, Zaretsky MV, Soranno DE, Dannull KA, Tucker BD, Marwan AI. Uterine didelphys with concomitant renal anomalies in both mother and fetus. J Pediatr Surg Case Rep 2016; 14: 19-21
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Sugi MD, Penna R, Jha P. et al. Müllerian duct anomalies: role in fertility and pregnancy. Radiographics 2021; 41 (06) 1857-1875
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Thom EA, Blackwell SC. et al; NICHD Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. Antenatal betamethasone for women at risk for late preterm delivery. N Engl J Med 2016; 374 (14) 1311-1320
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Naidoo V, Mbajiorgu E, Adam A. Embryology and Development of Congenital Anomalies of the Pelvis and Female Organs. In: Martins FE, Holm HV, Sandhu JS, McCammon KA. eds Female Genitourinary and Pelvic Floor Reconstruction. Springer International Publishing; 2023: 29-48
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Hall-Craggs MA, Kirkham A, Creighton SM. Renal and urological abnormalities occurring with Mullerian anomalies. J Pediatr Urol 2013; 9 (01) 27-32
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Mooren ERM, Cleypool CGJ, de Kort LMO, Goverde AJ, Dik P. A retrospective analysis of female Müllerian duct anomalies in association with congenital renal abnormalities. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2021; 34 (05) 681-685
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Heinonen PK. Clinical implications of the didelphic uterus: long-term follow-up of 49 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000; 91 (02) 183-190
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Moufawad G, Giannini A, D'Oria O. et al. Obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal anomaly syndrome: a systematic review about diagnosis and surgical management. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 2023; 12 (03) 123-129
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Kudela G, Wiernik A, Drosdzol-Cop A. et al. Multiple variants of obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal anomaly (OHVIRA) syndrome - one clinical center case series and the systematic review of 734 cases. J Pediatr Urol 2021; 17 (05) 653.e1-653.e9
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Friedman MA, Aguilar L, Heyward Q, Wheeler C, Caldamone A. Screening for Mullerian anomalies in patients with unilateral renal agenesis: leveraging early detection to prevent complications. J Pediatr Urol 2018; 14 (02) 144-149
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 Pellerito JS, McCarthy SM, Doyle MB, Glickman MG, DeCherney AH. Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accuracy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography. Radiology 1992; 183 (03) 795-800
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Robbins JB, Broadwell C, Chow LC, Parry JP, Sadowski EA. Müllerian duct anomalies: embryological development, classification, and MRI assessment. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015; 41 (01) 1-12
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Trahan M-J, Czuzoj-Shulman N, Abenhaim HA. Pregnancy outcomes among women with uterus didelphys. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226 (01) S501
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Wang S, Wang K, Hu Q, Liao H, Wang X, Yu H. Perinatal outcomes of women with Müllerian anomalies. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023; 307 (04) 1209-1216
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Goulios C, McCuaig R, Hobson L, White S. Management of a twin pregnancy in a didelphys uterus: one fetus in each uterine cavity. BMJ Case Rep 2020; 13 (08) e235256
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Allegrezza DM. Uterus didelphys and dicavitary twin pregnancy. J Diagn Med Sonogr 2007; 23: 286
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 19 Ćwiertnia A, Borzyszkowska D, Golara A. et al. The impact of uterus didelphys on fertility and pregnancy. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19 (17) 10571
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 20 Cheung MA, Martin AM. Single incision Caesarean section for dicavitary twin pregnancy in uterus didelphys. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023; 291: 259-260
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 21 Mandelbaum RS, Anderson ZS, Masjedi AD. et al. Obstetric outcomes of women with congenital uterine anomalies in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2024; 6 (08) 101396
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 22 King AL, Pixton S, Lanzarone V. Uterine didelphys with dicavitary twin gestation: a case report. Case Rep Womens Health 2020; 27: e00199
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 23 Narula S, Jiang M, Rosa P. A case report on an 18-year-old primigravida patient with uterine didelphys. J Clin Gynecol Obstet 2022; 11 (03) 86-88
    Search in Google Scholar