Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a25934172
DOI: 10.1055/a-2593-4172
Original article

Benefits of macroscopic on-site evaluation in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for comprehensive genomic profiling

Authors

  • Junya Sato

    1   Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Sunto-gun, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38471)
    2   Gastroenterology, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12927)
  • Hirotoshi Ishiwatari

    1   Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Sunto-gun, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38471)
  • Kazuma Ishikawa

    3   Department of Medical Oncology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN13035)
    1   Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Sunto-gun, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38471)
  • Hiroki Sakamoto

    1   Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Sunto-gun, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38471)
  • Takuya Doi

    1   Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Sunto-gun, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38471)
  • Masahiro Yamamura

    1   Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Sunto-gun, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38471)
  • Kazunori Takada

    1   Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Sunto-gun, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38471)
  • Yoichi Yamamoto

    1   Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Sunto-gun, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38471)
  • Masao Yoshida

    1   Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Sunto-gun, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38471)
  • Sayo Ito

    1   Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Sunto-gun, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38471)
  • Noboru Kawata

    1   Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Sunto-gun, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38471)
  • Kenichiro Imai

    1   Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Sunto-gun, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38471)
  • Kinichi Hotta

    1   Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Sunto-gun, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38471)
  • Hiroyuki Ono

    1   Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Sunto-gun, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38471)
Preview

Abstract

Background and study aims

Matched therapy based on comprehensive genomic profiling is a potential treatment option for patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer; however, the optimal method for obtaining tissue samples suitable for comprehensive genomic profiling using endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the optimal endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition method to obtain samples for comprehensive genomic profiling.

Patients and methods

This retrospective study included 86 consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling using FoundationOne CDx (Foundation Medicine Inc.) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition between June 2019 and January 2023. Macroscopic visible core length was measured using on-site macroscopic evaluation in all patients. Foundation Medicine Inc. reported analysis results categorized as passed (successful FoundationOne CDx), qualified, or failed. We investigated factors predicting successful FoundationOne CDx treatment.

Results

Needles sized 22, 20, and 19 gauge were used in 63, one, and 23 patients, respectively. The stylet slow-pull and suction techniques were performed in 43 and 41 patients, respectively. Median total macroscopic visible core length in the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks subjected to FoundationOne CDx was 41 mm. The success rate for FoundationOne CDx was 66%. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that macroscopic visible core length independently affected successful FoundationOne CDx (P = 0.0019).

Conclusions

In tissue specimens obtained using endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition, macroscopic visible core length can be associated with an appropriate sample for FoundationOne CDx.



Publication History

Received: 04 December 2024

Accepted after revision: 19 March 2025

Article published online:
16 May 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Bibliographical Record
Junya Sato, Hirotoshi Ishiwatari, Kazuma Ishikawa, Hiroki Sakamoto, Takuya Doi, Masahiro Yamamura, Kazunori Takada, Yoichi Yamamoto, Masao Yoshida, Sayo Ito, Noboru Kawata, Kenichiro Imai, Kinichi Hotta, Hiroyuki Ono. Benefits of macroscopic on-site evaluation in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for comprehensive genomic profiling. Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a25934172.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2593-4172
 
  • References

  • 1 Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 2019; 69: 7-34
  • 2 Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R. et al. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res 2014; 74: 2913-2921
  • 3 Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE. et al. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72: 7-33
  • 4 Pishvaian MJ, Blais EM, Brody JR. et al. Overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer receiving matched therapies following molecular profiling: a retrospective analysis of the Know Your Tumor registry trial. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21: 508-518
  • 5 Ida H, Koyama T, Mizuno T. et al. Clinical utility of comprehensive genomic profiling tests for advanced or metastatic solid tumor in clinical practice. Cancer Sci 2022; 113: 4300-4310
  • 6 Sunami K, Bando H, Yatabe Y. et al. Appropriate use of cancer comprehensive genome profiling assay using circulating tumor DNA. Cancer Sci 2021; 112: 3911-3917
  • 7 Polkowski M, Jenssen C, Kaye P. et al. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline – March 2017. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 989-1006
  • 8 Fujie S, Ishiwatari H, Sasaki K. et al. Comparison of the diagnostic yield of the standard 22-gauge needle and the new 20-gauge forward-bevel core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition from pancreatic lesions. Gut Liver 2019; 13: 349-355
  • 9 Sato J, Ishiwatari H, Sasaki K. et al. Benefit of high negative pressure during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with standard 22-gauge needles for pancreatic lesions: a retrospective comparative study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2019; 54: 108-113
  • 10 Kondo T, Matsubara J, Quy PN. et al. Comprehensive genomic profiling for patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced cancer. Cancer Sci 2021; 112: 296-304
  • 11 Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Navaneethan U. et al. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy of pancreatic masses can yield true histology. Gut 2018; 67: 2081-2084
  • 12 Gkolfakis P, Crinò SF, Tziatzios G. et al. Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95: 1067-1077.e15
  • 13 Takagi T, Sugimoto M, Imamura H. et al. A multicenter comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy using a Franseen needle versus conventional endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration to evaluate microsatellite instability in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Clin Endosc 2023; 56: 107-113
  • 14 Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Mukai T. et al. Macroscopic on-site quality evaluation of biopsy specimens to improve the diagnostic accuracy during EUS-guided FNA using a 19-gauge needle for solid lesions: a single-center prospective pilot study (MOSE study). Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 177-185
  • 15 Ishiwatari H, Sato J, Fujie S. et al. Gross visual inspection by endosonographers during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Pancreatology 2019; 19: 191-195
  • 16 Kaneko J, Ishiwatari H, Sasaki K. et al. Macroscopic on-site evaluation of biopsy specimens for accurate pathological diagnosis during EUS-guided fine needle biopsy using 22-G Franseen needle. Endosc Ultrasound 2020; 9: 385-391
  • 17 Kaneko J, Ishiwatari H, Sasaki K. et al. Macroscopic visible core length can predict the histological sample quantity in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition: multicenter prospective study. Dig Endosc 2022; 34: 622-631
  • 18 Ishiwatari H. The role of macroscopic on-site evaluation in the era of biopsy needles: is it still useful?. Endoscopy 2023; 55: 138-139
  • 19 Ishikawa K, Ishiwatari H, Sasaki K. et al. Optimization of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sample acquisition for commercially available comprehensive genome profiling. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 38: 1794-1801
  • 20 Li SY, Shi L, Yao J. et al. Optimal sampling technique for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions using a 25-gauge ProCore needle: A multicenter randomized crossover superiority study. Endosc Ultrasound 2022; 11: 466-477
  • 21 Mohamadnejad M, Mullady D, Early DS. et al. Increasing number of passes beyond 4 does not increase sensitivity of detection of pancreatic malignancy by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 15: 1071-1078.e2
  • 22 Ikeda G, Hijioka S, Nagashio Y. et al. Fine-needle biopsy with 19G needle is effective in combination with endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for genomic profiling of unresectable pancreatic cancer. Dig Endosc 2023; 35: 124-133
  • 23 Okuno N, Hara K, Mizuno N. et al. Clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for comprehensive genomic profiling of pancreatic cancer. Clin Endosc 2023; 56: 221-228
  • 24 Song TJ, Kim JH, Lee SS. et al. The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 1739-1745