RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/a-2650-2623
Diagnostic and therapeutic value of appendoscope-assisted endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy
Gefördert durch: Young Talent Project of Long Yuan 2022

Abstract
Background and study aims
The appendoscope, derived from the peroral digital single-operator cholangioscope, is an endoscopic device enabling direct visualization of the appendix lumen for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. This study aimed to investigate diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy of appendoscope-assisted endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) in patients with appendicitis.
Patents and methods
A total of 131 patients were enrolled in the study, with 125 included in the final analysis. Patient demographics, procedure success, abdominal pain resolution, appendoscope manifestations, treatment strategies, procedure time, duration of antibiotic use, postoperative hospital stay, and comorbidities were recorded. Complications and recurrences were followed up. These variables were subsequently analyzed to evaluate efficacy of appendoscope-assisted ERAT.
Results
The technical success rate of appendoscope-assisted ERAT was 98.5%, and the clinical success rate was 100%. Appendoscope visual manifestations included appendicolith (76.8%, n = 96), stenosis (16.8%, n = 21), foreign body (6.4%, n = 8), mucosal inflammation (13.6%, n = 17), and perforation (3.2%, n = 4), with these findings occurring individually or in combination. Abdominal pain disappeared within 12 hours post-procedure in 79% of patients (n = 99). Average procedure time was 50.3 ± 18.9 minutes. Antibiotic therapy duration was less than 2 days in 39% of patients (n = 49), whereas 19% (n = 24) received no antibiotics. Average postoperative hospital stay was 1.9 ± 1.4 days. Concomitant intestinal lesions were identified in 16 patients (12.8%). Recurrence occurred in 4.8% of patients (n = 6) during a 4- to 16-month follow-up. No complications were recorded.
Conclusions
Appendoscope-assisted ERAT is a feasible, accurate, safe, and effective alternative for diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis.
Keywords
Endoscopy Lower GI Tract - Diagnosis and imaging (inc chromoendoscopy, NBI, iSCAN, FICE, CLE...) - Endoscopy Upper GI Tract - Dilation, injection, stenting - GI surgeryPublikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 14. März 2025
Angenommen nach Revision: 23. Juni 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
07. Juli 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
29. Juli 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
Pengcheng Liu, Liqiong Wu, Pengju Li, Yu Li, Dianzuo Sun. Diagnostic and therapeutic value of appendoscope-assisted endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy. Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a26502623.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2650-2623
-
References
- 1
Krzyzak M,
Mulrooney SM.
Acute appendicitis review: Background, epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Cureus
2020; 12: e8562
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Zhang A,
Fan N,
Zhang X.
et al.
Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2024; 17: 17562848241275314
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Flum DR,
Davidson GH,
Monsell SE.
et al.
A randomized trial comparing antibiotics with appendectomy for appendicitis. N Engl
J Med 2020; 383: 1907-1919
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Talan DA,
Saltzman DJ,
Mower WR.
et al.
Antibiotics-first versus surgery for appendicitis: a US pilot randomized controlled
trial allowing outpatient antibiotic management. Ann Emerg Med 2017; 70: 1-11
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Salminen P,
Tuominen R,
Paajanen H.
et al.
Five-year follow-up of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in
the APPAC randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2018; 320: 1259-1265
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Herrod PJJ,
Kwok AT,
Lobo DN.
Randomized clinical trials comparing antibiotic therapy with appendicectomy for uncomplicated
acute appendicitis: meta-analysis. BJS Open 2022; 6: zrac 100
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Di Saverio S,
Birindelli A,
Kelly MD.
et al.
WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. World
J Emerg Surg 2016; 11: 34
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Flum DR.
Clinical practice. Acute appendicitis--appendectomy or the "antibiotics first" strategy.
N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 1937-1943
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Collard MK,
Bardin J,
Laurin M.
et al.
The cecal appendix is correlated with greater maximal longevity in mammals. J Anat
2021; 239: 1157-1169
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Vitetta L,
Chen J,
Clarke S.
The vermiform appendix: an immunological organ sustaining a microbiome inoculum. Clin
Sci (Lond) 2019; 133: 1-8
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Randal Bollinger R,
Barbas AS,
Bush EL.
et al.
Biofilms in the large bowel suggest an apparent function of the human vermiform appendix.
J Theor Biol 2007; 249: 826-831
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Liu Z,
Ma X,
Zhu C.
et al.
Risk of colorectal cancer after appendectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 38: 350-358
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Kim SY,
Lim H,
Park B.
et al.
Increased risk of gallstones after appendectomy: A longitudinal follow-up study using
a national sample cohort. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99: e20269
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Zhang L,
Hu C,
Zhang Z.
et al.
Association between prior appendectomy and the risk and course of Crohn's disease:
A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2023; 47: 102090
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Flum DR,
Morris A,
Koepsell T.
et al.
Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis.
JAMA 2001; 286: 1748-1753
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Chaochankit W,
Boocha A,
Samphao S.
Negative appendectomy rate in patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis. BMC Surg
2022; 22: 404
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Ma KW,
Chia NH,
Yeung HW.
et al.
If not appendicitis, then what else can it be? A retrospective review of 1492 appendectomies.
Hong Kong Med J 2010; 16: 12-17
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Tao L,
Wang H,
Guo Q.
et al.
Appendicoscopy using single-operator cholangioscope in the management of acute obstructive
appendicitis: a novel alternative (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 100: 532-536
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Kong LJ,
Liu D,
Zhang JY.
et al.
Digital single-operator cholangioscope for endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy.
Endoscopy 2022; 54: 396-400
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Jeffrey Jr RB,
Laing FC,
Townsend RR.
Acute appendicitis: Sonographic criteria based on 250 cases. Radiology 1988; 167:
327-329
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Memon ZA,
Irfan S,
Fatima K.
et al.
Acute appendicitis: diagnostic accuracy of Alvarado scoring system. Asian J Surg 2013;
36: 144-149
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Liu BR,
Kong LJ,
Ullah S.
et al.
Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) vs appendectomy for acute uncomplicated
appendicitis: A prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Dig Dis 2022;
23: 636-641
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Feng S,
Ling K,
Zhang T.
et al.
Application of an appendoscope in chronic appendicitis. Endoscopy 2022; 54: E296-E297
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Song M,
Ullah S,
Liu B.
Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy for treating periappendiceal abscess: first
human case report. Am J Gastroenterol 2021; 116: 1119
MissingFormLabel
- 25
Kanat BH,
Solmaz ÖA,
Bozdağ P.
et al.
Chronic appendicitis: the process from pre-diagnosis to pathology. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol
Sci 2021; 25: 7898-7902
MissingFormLabel
- 26
Mahida JB,
Lodwick DL,
Nacion KM.
et al.
High failure rate of nonoperative management of acute appendicitis with an appendicolith
in children. J Pediatr Surg 2016; 51: 908-911
MissingFormLabel
- 27
Shen Z,
Sun P,
Jiang M.
et al.
Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus laparoscopic appendectomy versus
open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a pilot study. BMC Gastroenterol 2022; 22:
63
MissingFormLabel
- 28
Yang B,
Kong L,
Ullah S.
et al.
Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus. laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated
acute appendicitis. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 747-754
MissingFormLabel