J Reconstr Microsurg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2717-4946
Original Article

Efferent Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis for Pelvic and Lower Extremity Lymphedema after Gynecologic Cancer Treatment: Indication and Timing Criteria Based on Nodal Function

Authors

  • Yukio Seki

    1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Bunkyo, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN73362)
    2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12927)
    3   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shonan Atsugi Hospital, Atsugi, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN206403)
  • Hitoshi Nemoto

    4   Department of Plastic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38261)
  • Teruhito Okino

    2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12927)
  • Rintarou Asai

    2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12927)
    3   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shonan Atsugi Hospital, Atsugi, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN206403)
  • Mayo Tomochika

    2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12927)
    3   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shonan Atsugi Hospital, Atsugi, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN206403)
  • Akiyoshi Kajikawa

    5   Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Saint Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12927)
Preview

Background: Efferent lymphaticovenular anastomosis (ELVA) uses efferent lymphatic vessels from inguinal lymph nodes, which receive multiple afferent inputs from the lower extremity, to drain substantial lymphatic fluid. However, nodal degeneration during disease progression may impair function and affect ELVA efficacy. This study evaluated ELVA outcomes for lower extremity and pelvic lymphedema based on presence or absence of nodal degeneration. Methods: This retrospective study included 30 patients who underwent LVA using the ELVA technique for pelvic and lower extremity lymphedema following gynecological cancer treatment. Preoperative ultrasonography was performed to assess vascularity of the inguinal lymph nodes. Patients with preserved nodal vascularity were classified into the primary ELVA group and underwent ELVA as the initial treatment. Those without detectable vascular flow were initially treated with leg LVA; ELVA was subsequently performed once vascularity of the inguinal nodes improved. Treatment efficacy was evaluated based on changes in pelvic and leg volume indices. Results: Based on preoperative ultrasonography, 7 patients were classified into the primary ELVA group and 23 into the secondary ELVA group. Preoperative ICG lymphography revealed significantly lower severity in the primary group (p < 0.01). The mean postoperative follow-up period was 31.5 months. Significant volume reductions were observed in leg and pelvic regions, with LEL index reduced from 275.1 ± 33.8 to 247.8 ± 28.2 (p < 0.01), and PEL index from 1053.2 ± 81.2 to 972.7 ± 76.5 (p < 0.01). No significant differences in volume reduction were found between the two groups. Conclusion: ELVA may be effective for both pelvic and lower extremity lymphedema, even in advanced cases when performed after nodal function recovery.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 10. Juni 2025

Angenommen nach Revision: 21. September 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
09. Oktober 2025

© . Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor , NY 10001 New York, USA