Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2737-6583
Optimizing Postoperative Mobility: A Review of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocols for Pedicled Flap-Based Pelvic Reconstructions
Authors
Abstract
Background
Surgical reconstruction of pelvic defects aims to restore pelvic floor anatomy and function after oncological resection, infection, or trauma. The functional demands of the pelvis and proximity to anogenital flora can complicate wound healing, often necessitating locoregional flap reconstruction. While enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have shown benefits in other surgeries, they lack standardization for pedicled flap-based pelvic and perineal reconstructions.
Methods
PubMed and Embase were queried for articles from January 2000 to January 2025 reporting pedicled flap-based pelvic and perineal reconstruction. Single case reports were excluded. Data regarding postoperative mobility protocols, including bed rest, mobilization, sitting, drain management, discharge timing, and complication rates, were extracted and categorized by the flap donor site region.
Results
Out of 536 articles identified, 42 met inclusion criteria. Remobilization protocols varied across different flap types. The median out-of-bed remobilization times for vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous, inferior gluteal artery perforator, internal pudendal artery perforator, anterolateral thigh, and gracilis flaps were 5, 2, 5, 2, and 1 days postoperatively, respectively, with an overall range of 0 to 36 days. Sitting was allowed at 15, 6, 14, 14, and 2 days postoperatively for these flaps.
Conclusion
The findings advocate for standardized ERAS protocols with early mobilization and graded sitting, challenging traditional prolonged bed rest practices. We propose specific guidelines for pedicled flap reconstruction of the pelvic and perineal areas, including 1 to 2 days of strict bed rest followed by short-distance ambulation. Gradual sitting protocols should start in the second week with attention to cushioning and offloading. For more vulnerable perineal-based flaps, 4 to 5 days of bed rest and sitting beginning in the third week are recommended. Continuing recovery at a rehabilitation center is also advised. Future studies are needed to examine and modify these protocols, taking into consideration patient factors, disease severity, such as radiation exposure, and the type of reconstruction performed.
Authors' Contributions
The conceptual development of this manuscript was overseen by the senior author, S.M.B., who provided supervision throughout the research process. The literature review, data collection, data analysis, and creation of the manuscript, figures, and tables were undertaken by the shared first authors, S.Z.C. and D.J. Authors J.M.S and T.H.T provided revisions and additional insights for the final version of the manuscript.
‡ Authors contributed equally.
Publication History
Received: 18 July 2025
Accepted: 03 November 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
06 November 2025
Article published online:
18 November 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Shin A, Elmorsi R, Nguyen CM. et al. Contemporary role of the plastic and reconstructive surgeon in the outcome of female peripelvic defects after oncologic extirpation. J Surg Oncol 2024; 130 (05) 1119-1129
- 2 Shahzad F, Ray E. Pelvic and perineal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 154 (04) 803e-816e
- 3 Devulapalli C, Jia Wei AT, DiBiagio JR. et al. Primary versus flap closure of perineal defects following oncologic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (05) 1602-1613
- 4 Witte DYS, van Ramshorst GH, Lapid O, Bouman MB, Tuynman JB. Flap reconstruction of perineal defects after pelvic exenteration: a systematic description of four choices of surgical reconstruction methods. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147 (06) 1420-1435
- 5 Johnstone MS. Vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous versus alternative flaps for perineal repair after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum in the era of laparoscopic surgery. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 79 (01) 101-106
- 6 Komono A, Yoshimatsu G, Kajitani R, Matsumoto Y, Aisu N, Hasegawa S. Reconstruction with omental flap and negative pressure wound therapy after total pelvic exenteration of anal fistula cancer: a case report. Surg Case Rep 2022; 8 (01) 116
- 7 Chao AH, McCann GA, Fowler JM. Alternatives to commonly used pelvic reconstruction procedures in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 134 (01) 172-180
- 8 Arcieri M, Restaino S, Rosati A. et al. Primary flap closure of perineal defects to avoid empty pelvis syndrome after pelvic exenteration in gynecologic malignancies: an old question to explore a new answer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2024; 50 (02) 107278
- 9 Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J. et al; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) group recommendations. Arch Surg 2009; 144 (10) 961-969
- 10 Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M, Clavien PA, Demartines N. Zurich Fast Track Study Group. A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Gastroenterology 2009; 136 (03) 842-847
- 11 Gort N, van Gaal BGI, Tielemans HJP, Ulrich DJO, Hummelink S. Positive effects of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Breast 2021; 60: 53-57
- 12 Ellwanger MP, Ellwanger MP, Jardine MB. et al. Effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 29 (03) 101939
- 13 Frenkel CH, Donahue EE, Cochran A. et al. The impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for major head and neck oncologic surgery on postoperative complications and adjuvant treatment delivery. Head Neck 2025; 47 (01) 68-80
- 14 Clark RC, Alving-Trinh A, Becker M, Leach GA, Gosman A, Reid CM. Moving the needle: a narrative review of enhanced recovery protocols in breast reconstruction. Ann Transl Med 2023; 11 (12) 414
- 15 Jagasia P, Torres-Guzman RA, Dash E. et al. Meta analysis of 2059 patients assessing early discharge after DIEP flap breast reconstruction: comprehensive outcomes before post-operative day 5. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2024; 99: 230-237
- 16 Warbrick-Smith J, Drew PJ. Post-operative care of VRAM flaps for perineal reconstruction: results of a UK practice survey and literature review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71 (02) 271-273
- 17 Holm T, Ljung A, Häggmark T, Jurell G, Lagergren J. Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2007; 94 (02) 232-238
- 18 Hainsworth A, Al Akash M, Roblin P, Mohanna P, Ross D, George ML. Perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision using inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps. Br J Surg 2012; 99 (04) 584-588
- 19 Johal KS, Mishra A, Alkizwini E. et al. Immediate vaginal and perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision using the inferior gluteal artery perforator flap (V-IGAP). J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75 (01) 137-144
- 20 Thiel JT, Welskopf HL, Yurttas C, Farzaliyev F, Daigeler A, Bachmann R. Feasibility of perineal defect reconstruction with simplified fasciocutaneous inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) flaps after tumor resection of the lower rectum: incidence and outcome in an interdisciplinary approach. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15 (13) 3345
- 21 Kreisel SI, Sparenberg S, Sharabiany S. et al. Gluteal fasciocutaneous flap reconstruction after salvage surgery for pelvic sepsis. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66 (12) 1570-1577
- 22 Pérez-García A, García-Granero Á, Thione A. et al. Extended vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for reconstruction of large pelviperineal defects following oncologic resection. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126 (08) 1383-1388
- 23 Harries RL, Radwan RW, Dewi M. et al; Swansea Pelvic Oncology Collaborators. Outcomes following immediate vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap-based perineal reconstruction following resectional surgery for pelvic malignancies. World J Surg 2021; 45 (07) 2290-2297
- 24 LaBove GA, Evans GR, Biggerstaff B. et al. Ten-Year experience with vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for reconstruction of abdominoperineal resection defects. JPRAS Open 2020; 27: 90-98
- 25 Horch RE, Ludolph I, Cai A, Weber K, Grützmann R, Arkudas A. Interdisciplinary surgical approaches in vaginal and perineal reconstruction of advanced rectal and anal female cancer patients. Front Oncol 2020; 10: 719
- 26 Wang ED, Conkling N, Xu X. et al. Perineal flap reconstruction following oncologic anorectal extirpation: an outcomes assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (01) 176e-184e
- 27 Lefevre JH, Parc Y, Kernéis S. et al. Abdomino-perineal resection for anal cancer: impact of a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneus flap on survival, recurrence, morbidity, and wound healing. Ann Surg 2009; 250 (05) 707-711
- 28 Butler CE, Gündeslioglu AO, Rodriguez-Bigas MA. Outcomes of immediate vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction for irradiated abdominoperineal resection defects. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 206 (04) 694-703
- 29 Tei TM, Stolzenburg T, Buntzen S, Laurberg S, Kjeldsen H. Use of transpelvic rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for anal cancer salvage surgery. Br J Surg 2003; 90 (05) 575-580
- 30 Perrault D, Kin C, Wan DC, Kirilcuk N, Shelton A, Momeni A. Pelvic/perineal reconstruction: time to consider the anterolateral thigh flap as a first-line option?. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (04) e2733
- 31 di Summa PG, Matter M, Kalbermatten DF, Bauquis O, Raffoul W. Transabdominal-pelvic-perineal (TAPP) anterolateral thigh flap: A new reconstructive technique for complex defects following extended abdominoperineal resection. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (03) 359-367
- 32 Khouri Jr RK, Accioly JPE, DeWitt-Foy ME, Wood HM, Angermeier KW. Posterior urethral reconstruction at the time of rectourethral fistula repair: technique and outcomes. Urology 2024; 186: 36-40
- 33 DeLozier OM, Stiles ZE, Shibata D. et al. Gracilis flap reconstruction after proctocolectomy for malignancy and inflammatory bowel disease. Am Surg 2023; 89 (02) 247-254
- 34 Zhang C, Yang X, Bi H. Application of depithelized gracilis adipofascial flap for pelvic floor reconstruction after pelvic exenteration. BMC Surg 2022; 22 (01) 304
- 35 Coelho JAJ, McDermott FD, Cameron O, Smart NJ, Watts AM, Daniels IR. Single centre experience of bilateral gracilis flap perineal reconstruction following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision. Colorectal Dis 2019; 21 (08) 910-916
- 36 Singh M, Kinsley S, Huang A. et al. Gracilis flap reconstruction of the perineum: an outcomes analysis. J Am Coll Surg 2016; 223 (04) 602-610
- 37 Chong TW, Balch GC, Kehoe SM, Margulis V, Saint-Cyr M. Reconstruction of large perineal and pelvic wounds using gracilis muscle flaps. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22 (11) 3738-3744
- 38 Ducic I, Dayan JH, Attinger CE, Curry P. Complex perineal and groin wound reconstruction using the extended dissection technique of the gracilis flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (02) 472-478
- 39 Hellinga J, Khoe PC, van Etten B. et al. Fasciocutaneous lotus petal flap for perineal wound reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision: application for reconstruction of the pelvic floor and creation of a neovagina. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23 (12) 4073-4079
- 40 Chasapi M, Maher M, Mitchell P, Dalal M. The perineal turnover perforator flap: a new and simple technique for perineal reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 80 (04) 395-399
- 41 Friedman JD, Reece GR, Eldor L. The utility of the posterior thigh flap for complex pelvic and perineal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (01) 146-155
- 42 Arquette C, Wan D, Momeni A. Perineal reconstruction with the profunda artery perforator flap. Ann Plast Surg 2022; 88 (04) 434-439
- 43 Lavie JL, Guidry RF, Palines PA. et al. The vertical profunda artery perforator flap for perineal reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2024; 93 (02) 239-245
- 44 Gentileschi S, Servillo M, Garganese G. et al. Surgical therapy of vulvar cancer: how to choose the correct reconstruction?. J Gynecol Oncol 2016; 27 (06) e60
- 45 Calotta NA, Coon D, Bos TJ. et al. Early ambulation after colorectal oncologic resection with perineal reconstruction is safe and effective. Am J Surg 2019; 218 (01) 125-130
- 46 Baird DLH, Pellino G, Rasheed S. et al. A comparison of the short-term outcomes of three flap reconstruction techniques used after beyond total mesorectal excision surgery for anorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63 (04) 461-468
- 47 Benedict KC, Songcharoen SJ, Stephens KL. et al. Comparison of inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps versus vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps in the reconstruction of perineal wounds. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 84: 514-520
- 48 Kaartinen IS, Vuento MH, Hyöty MK, Kallio J, Kuokkanen HO. Reconstruction of the pelvic floor and the vagina after total pelvic exenteration using the transverse musculocutaneous gracilis flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (01) 93-97
- 49 Pai AA, Young-Sing Q, Bera S, Maheshwari K, Misra A. Analysis of clinical and patient-reported outcomes in post-ELAPE perineal reconstruction with IGAP flap - a 5-year review. JPRAS Open 2022; 34: 10-20
- 50 Khalil HH, McArthur D, Youssif S. et al. Sacroperineal reconstruction with inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps after resection of locally advanced primary and recurrent anorectal malignancy. Ann Plast Surg 2022; 89 (03) 306-311
- 51 Chrelias T, Berkane Y, Rousson E. et al. Gluteal propeller perforator flaps: a paradigm shift in abdominoperineal amputation reconstruction. J Clin Med 2023; 12 (12) 4014
- 52 Wagstaff MJ, Rozen WM, Whitaker IS, Enajat M, Audolfsson T, Acosta R. Perineal and posterior vaginal wall reconstruction with superior and inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps. Microsurgery 2009; 29 (08) 626-629
- 53 Mericli AF, Martin JP, Campbell CA. An algorithmic anatomical subunit approach to pelvic wound reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (03) 1004-1017
- 54 Coltro PS, Ferreira MC, Busnardo FF. et al. Evaluation of cutaneous sensibility of the internal pudendal artery perforator (IPAP) flap after perineal reconstructions. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (02) 252-261
- 55 Coltro PS, Busnardo FF, Mônaco Filho FC. et al. Outcomes of immediate internal pudendal artery perforator flap reconstruction for irradiated abdominoperineal resection defects. Dis Colon Rectum 2017; 60 (09) 945-953
- 56 Lima de Araujo CA, de Freitas Busnardo F, Thome Grillo VA. et al. Effect of early postoperative mobilization on functional recovery, hospital length of stay, and postoperative complications after immediate internal pudendal artery perforator flap reconstruction for irradiated abdominoperineal resection defects: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2025; 32 (02) 993-1004
- 57 Khoury A, Bailey S, Mackey SP. Optimal postoperative management of perineal flaps in oncologic patients undergoing extralevator abdominoperineal excision: an introduction of a postoperative monitoring and flap management protocol. J Perioper Pract 2022; 32 (1-2): 10-14
- 58 Committee ADAPP. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 12. Retinopathy, neuropathy, and foot care: standards of care in diabetes-2025. Diabetes Care 2025; 48 (1, Suppl 1) S252-S265
- 59 Dutta R, Xu R, Cui T, Bubnov AS, Matthews CA. Safety and economics of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J 2022; 33 (07) 1875-1880
- 60 Allen RJ, Levine JL, Granzow JW. The in-the-crease inferior gluteal artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (02) 333-339
- 61 Sinnott CJ, Stavrides S, Boutros C, Kuruvilla A, Glickman LT. Dual-plane gluteal myocutaneous flap for reconstruction of ischial tuberosity pressure wounds. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 85 (S1, Suppl 1): S23-S27
- 62 Asanza JL, Matsuwaka ST, Keys K, Arrowood C, Doan MM, Burns SP. Comparing 4- and 6-week post-flap protocols in patients with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2021; 44 (03) 392-398
- 63 Graziano FD, Plotsker EL, Amakiri UO. et al. Moving towards the outpatient DIEP flap: factors influencing early discharge. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024;
- 64 Bajaj A, Sarkar P, Yau A. et al. The cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2024; 12 (05) e5793
- 65 Siegel JK, Gomez K, Bier-Laning C. Decreased postoperative emesis and opioid use after implementation of ERAS protocol for free flap surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024;
- 66 Højvig JH, Charabi BW, Wessel I. et al. Enhanced recovery after microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - a prospective study. JPRAS Open 2022; 34: 103-113
- 67 Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G. et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ 2017; 358: j4008
- 68 BED REST. BED REST, thrombosis, and embolism. Lancet 1958; 1 (7018) 465-466
- 69 Brower RG. Consequences of bed rest. Crit Care Med 2009; 37 (10) S422-S428
- 70 Harper CM, Lyles YM. Physiology and complications of bed rest. J Am Geriatr Soc 1988; 36 (11) 1047-1054
