Endoscopy 2009; 41(2): 133-137
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1103491
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Catheter probe extraductal ultrasonography vs. conventional endoscopic ultrasonography for detection of bile duct stones

T.  Wehrmann1 , K.  Martchenko2 , A.  Riphaus2
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Deutsche Klinik für Diagnostik, Wiesbaden, Germany
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine I, Krankenhaus Siloah, Klinikum Region Hannover, Hannover, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 7 September 2008

accepted after revision 28 October 2008

Publication Date:
12 February 2009 (online)

Background and study aims: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has been established as a valuable diagnostic tool for the detection of bile duct stones (BDS). The recently introduced extraductal endoscopic ultrasonography (EDUS) using miniprobes has the advantage that it can be performed with a duodenoscope, and if therapeutic interventions become necessary, there is no need to change the scope.

Patients and methods: Consecutive patients with acute biliary pain and a dilated bile duct and/or elevated liver function tests, in whom the origin of biliary obstruction could not be identified by US and CT, were enrolled. The patients were investigated with a linear-array echoendoscope, and an additional transduodenal EDUS examination was performed with a 12-MHz miniprobe via the instrumentation channel of the echoendoscope. The presence or absence of BDS was afterwards evaluated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)/sphincterotomy (EST) and by instrumental bile duct exploration (in the case of a positive EUS/EDUS finding), or by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and ERCP with additional clinical follow-up (in the case of negative findings on EUS/EDUS).

Results: One hundred and fifty-five patients (55 ± 12 years old, 98 female) were enrolled. In six cases, the distal bile duct could not be successfully visualized by EDUS, whereas with EUS visualization failed in only one patient (P = 0.13). Choledocholithiasis was proven in 75 cases (48 %). The diagnostic accuracy of EUS for the detection of BDS (sensitivity 92 %, specificity 100 %, PPV 1.0, NPV 0.93, accuracy 95 %) was comparable to that of EDUS (sensitivity 90 %, specificity 98 %, PPV 0.99, NPV 0.93, accuracy 91 %, P = 0.17 vs. EUS).

Conclusions: In patients at intermediate risk of BDS it seems to be justified to perform EDUS instead of EUS, and to proceed with ERCP and EST immediately when findings are positive.

  • 1 Moparty B, Bhutani M S. Endoscopic ultrasonography for choledocholithiasis and biliary malignancy.  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2005;  8 135-142
  • 2 Buscarini E, Tansini P, Vallisa D. et al . EUS for suspected choledocholithiasis: do benefits outweigh costs? A prospective, controlled study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 510-587
  • 3 Kohut M, Nowak A, Nowaskowska-Dulawa E. et al . Endosonography with linear array instead of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography as the diagnostic tool in patients with moderate suspicion of common bile duct stones.  World J Gastroenterol. 2003;  9 612-614
  • 4 Napoleon B, Dumarties J, Keriven-Souquet O. et al . Do normal findings at biliary endoscopic ultrasonography obviate the need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspicion of common bile duct stone? A prospective follow-up study of 238 patients.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 411-415
  • 5 Thorboll J, Vilmann P, Jacobsen B, Hassan H. Endoscopic ultrasonography in detection of cholelithiasis in patients with biliary pain and negative transabdominal ultrasonography.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004;  39 267-269
  • 6 Kondo S, Isayama H, Ahane M. et al . Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography.  Eur J Radiol. 2005;  54 271-275
  • 7 Da Silveira E B, Barkun A. EUS-first versus ERC-first for patients with intermediate probability of bile duct stones: is one strategy superior to the other?.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 357-358
  • 8 Lee Y T, Chan F K, Leung W K. et al . Comparison of EUS and ERCP in the investigation with suspected biliary obstruction caused by choledocholithiasis: a randomized study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 660-668
  • 9 Polkowski M, Regula J, Tilszer A, Butruk E. Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for patients with intermediate probability of bile duct stones: a randomized trial comparing two management strategies.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 296-303
  • 10 Sotoudemanesh R, Koladoozan S, Asgari A A. et al . Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in prevention of unnecessary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective study of 150 patients.  J Ultrasound Med. 2007;  26 455-460
  • 11 Yasuda K, Mukai H, Cho E, Nakayima N, Kawai K. The use of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of carcinoma of the papilla of Vater.  Endoscopy. 1988;  20 218-222
  • 12 Tio T L, Sie L H, Kallimanis G. et al . Staging of ampullary and pancreatic carcinoma: comparison between endosonography and surgery.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 706-713
  • 13 Menzel J, Hoeppfner N, Sulkowski U. et al . Polypoid tumors of the major duodenal papilla: preoperative staging with intraductal US, EUS, and CT. A prospective, histopathologically controlled study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 349-357
  • 14 Wehrmann T, Martchenko K, Menke D. et al . Klinischer Stellenwert des intraduktalen Ultraschalls zur Klärung unklarer ERCP-Befunde.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2003;  128 863-869
  • 15 Ito K, Fujita N, Noda Y. et al . Preoperative evaluation of ampullary neoplasm with EUS and transpapillary intraductal US: a prospective and histopathologically controlled study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 740-747
  • 16 Garrow D, Miller S, Sinha D. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary obstruction.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;  5 616-623
  • 17 Tse F, Liu L, Barkun A N. et al . EUS: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected choledocholithiasis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 235-244
  • 18 Rocca R, DeAngelis C, Castellino F. et al . EUS diagnosis and simultaneous endoscopic retrograde cholangiography treatment of common bile duct stones by using an oblique-viewing echoendoscope.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 479-484
  • 19 Frenz M B, Wehrmann T. EUS and ERCP combined: together we are strong.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 484-485
  • 20 Shamwi V M, Kahaleh M. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS-)guided access and therapy of pancreatico-biliary disorders: EUS-guided cholangio- and pancreatic drainage.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2007;  17 581-593
  • 21 Seifert H, Wehrmann T, Hilgers R. et al . Catheter probe extraductal EUS reliably detects distal common bile duct abnormalities.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 61-67
  • 22 Wehrmann T, Kokabpick S, Lembcke B. et al . Efficacy and safety of intravenous propofol sedation during routine ERCP: a prospective, controlled study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 677-683
  • 23 Tse F, Barkun J S, Barkun A N. The elective evaluation of patients with suspected choledocholithiasis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 437-448
  • 24 Wehrmann T, Riphaus A, Martchenko K. et al . Intraductal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of Mirizzi syndrome.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 717-722

Till WehrmannMD, PhD 

Department of Gastroenterology
Deutsche Klinik für Diagnostik

Aukammallee 33
65193 Wiesbaden
Germany

Fax: +49-611-577460

Email: till.wehrmann@dkd-wiesbaden.de

    >