Download PDF
Ultraschall Med 2011; 32(1): 8-25
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1246017
Fort- und Weiterbildung/Continuing Medical Education

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Interventionelle Endosonografie

Interventional EndosonographyC. F. Dietrich1 , M. Hocke1 , C. Jenssen1
  • 1Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Innere Medizin 2
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 February 2011 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Lernziele

Verständnis des Prinzips, der Möglichkeiten und Limitationen endosonografisch gesteuerter therapeutischer Interventionen. Kenntnis über das Spektrum endosonografisch gesteuerter Therapieverfahren. Einschätzung des klinischen Stellenwerts endosonografisch gestützter Therapieverfahren im Vergleich zu perkutanen sonografisch geführten, endoskopischen und chirurgischen Interventionen. Kenntnis der Risiken endosonografisch geführter Therapieverfahren und der erforderlichen Nachsorgemaßnahmen.

Literatur/References

  • 1 Wiersema M J, Wiersema L M. Endosonography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 656-662
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Wiersema M J. Endosonography-guided cystoduodenostomy with a therapeutic ultrasound endoscope.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 614-617
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Wiersema M J, Sandusky D, Carr R et al. Endosonography-guided cholangiopancreatography.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 102-106
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Burmester E, Niehaus J, Leineweber T et al. EUS-cholangio-drainage of the bile duct: report of 4 cases.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 246-251
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Bataille L, Deprez P. A new application for therapeutic EUS: main pancreatic duct drainage with a „pancreatic rendezvous technique”.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 740-743
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Will U. Therapeutic endosonography.  Z Gastroenterol. 2008;  46 555-563
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Nealon W H, Walser E. Main pancreatic ductal anatomy can direct choice of modality for treating pancreatic pseudocysts (surgery versus percutaneous drainage).  Ann Surg. 2002;  235 751-758
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Jenssen C, Dietrich C F. Endoscopic ultrasound in chronic pancreatitis.  Z Gastroenterol. 2005;  43 737-749
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Beyer-Enke S A, Hocke M, Ignee A et al. Contrast enhanced transabdominal ultrasound in the characterisation of pancreatic lesions with cystic appearance.  JOP. 2010;  11 427-433
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Dietrich C F, Jenssen C, Allescher H D et al. Differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions using endoscopic ultrasound.  Z Gastroenterol. 2008;  46 601-617
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Dietrich C F, Ignee A, Braden B et al. Improved differentiation of pancreatic tumors using contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;  6 590-597
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Seitz K. Update on pancreas sonography.  Ultraschall in Med. 2001;  22 245
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Seifert H, Faust D, Schmitt T et al. Transmural drainage of cystic peripancreatic lesions with a new large-channel echo endoscope.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 1022-1026
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Seifert H, Dietrich C, Schmitt T et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided one-step transmural drainage of cystic abdominal lesions with a large-channel echo endoscope.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 255-259
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Burmester E. Die endosonografisch gesteuerte Cholangiodrainage (EUS-CD). In Dietrich C F, editor Endosonografie.. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme Verlag; 2008: 456-462
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Will U. Forcierte Interventionelle Endosonografie. Praktische Tipps und Tricks. Endosonografie.. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme Verlag; 2008: 463-475
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Jenssen C. Diagnostische Endosonografie – State of the Art 2009.  Endoskopie Heute. 2009;  22 89-91
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Wiersema M J, Wiersema L M. Endosonography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 656-662
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Hollerbach S. Endosonografisch gesteuerte Plexus-coeliacus-Blockade (EUS-FNI). Endosonografie.. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme Verlag; 2008: 449-455
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Levy M J, Topazian M D, Wiersema M J et al. Initial evaluation of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided direct Ganglia neurolysis and block.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;  103 98-103
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Seifert H, Biermer M, Schmitt W et al. Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy after acute pancreatitis: a multicentre study with long-term follow-up (the GEPARD Study).  Gut. 2009;  58 1260-1266
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Puli S R, Reddy J B, Bechtold M L et al. EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for pain due to chronic pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer pain: a meta-analysis and systematic review.  Dig Dis Sci. 2009;  54 2330-2337
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Kaufman M, Singh G, Das S et al. Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block and celiac plexus neurolysis for managing abdominal pain associated with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;  44 127-134
    Google Scholar
  • 24 O’Toole T M, Schmulewitz N. Complication rates of EUS-guided celiac plexus blockade and neurolysis: results of a large case series.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 593-597
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Coe S G, Raimondo M, Woodward T A et al. Quality in EUS: an assessment of baseline compliance and performance improvement by using the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-American College of Gastroenterology quality indicators.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 195-201
    Google Scholar

Prof. Dr. C. F. Dietrich

Caritas-Krankenhaus, Innere Medizin 2

Uhlandstr. 7

97980 Bad Mergentheim

Phone: + + 49/79 31/58 22 01

Fax: + + 49/79 31/58 22 90

Email: Christoph.Dietrich@ckbm.de

>