The Use of Eggs and Embryos in Stem Cell Research

ABSTRACT

Stem cell research has enormous potential to advance knowledge about many diseases but poses critical ethical issues. Many countries and U.S. states have developed policies concerning this area that over time will surely evolve, yet certain underlying ethical principles and tensions will no doubt continue to remain key. Overall, the basic ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmalfeasance, and justice are crucial but have been viewed, interpreted, and applied differently by policy makers and others. Controversies remain concerning what degree of respect eggs and embryos should receive; whether egg donors should be compensated, and if so, how much; what exactly to include in informed consent; and how to ensure appropriate oversight by institutional review boards and embryonic stem cell research oversight committees. This article addresses these areas and ways of approaching them, to adhere to important ethical principles, while helping to advance research that has the potential to help innumerable patients.

KEYWORDS

Ethics - policy - coercion - exploitation - informed consent

REFERENCES

• 1 Department of Health, Education, and Welfare .The Belmont Report, Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. 1979 http://Available at www.mri.edu.eg/mri/The%20Belmont%20Report.pdf
• 2 Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009. Title V, §509. Available at: http://www.dol.gov/dol/budget/2008/PDF/CBJ-2008-V3-07.pdf Accessed September 2, 2009
• 3 Nova Science Now on PBS .The politics of stem cells. Available at: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sciencenow/dispatches/050413.html Accessed September 2, 2009
• 4 National Research Council, Committee on Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research .Guidelines for human embryonic stem cell research. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11278.html Accessed September 2, 2009
• 5 Klitzman R. The importance of social, cultural, and economic contexts, and empirical research in examining “undue inducement”.  Am J Bioeth. 2005;  5(5) 19-21
• 6 National Academy of Sciences .The National Academies' Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research, 10. Washington, DC; The National Academies Press 2005
• 7 National Academy of Sciences .Amendments to the National Academies' Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Washington, DC; The National Academies Press; 2007 Available at: http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11871#toc Accessed September 2, 2009
• 8 National Academy of Sciences .Amendments to the National Academies' Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Washington, DC; The National Academies Press; 2008 Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12260 Accessed September 2, 2009
• 9 International Society for Stem Cell Research .Guidelines for the conduct of human embryonic stem cell research. Dec 21, 2006. Available at: http://www.isscr.org/guidelines/ISSCRhESCguidelines2006.pdf Accessed September 2, 2009
• 10 Daley G Q, Ahrlund Richter L, Auerbach J M et al. Ethics. The ISSCR guidelines for human embryonic stem cell research.  Science. 2007;  315(5812) 603-604
• 11 Okita K, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S. Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells.  Nature. 2007;  448(7151) 313-317
• 12 Ramsay J. Donating eggs for research—should the HFEA reconsider its policy on payments to egg donors?.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;  15(1) 25-33
• 13 Heng B C. International egg-sharing to provide donor oocytes for clinical assisted reproduction and derivation of nuclear transfer stem cells.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;  11(6) 676-678
• 14 Hyun I. Fair payment or undue inducement?.  Nature. 2006;  442(7103) 629-630
• 15 Thompson C. Why we should, in fact, pay for egg donation.  Regen Med. 2007;  2(2) 203-209
• 16 Spar D. The egg trade—making sense of the market for human oocytes.  N Engl J Med. 2007;  356(13) 1289-1291
• 17 Steinbrook R. Egg donation and human embryonic stem-cell research.  N Engl J Med. 2006;  354(4) 324-326
• 18 Okie S. Stem-cell research—signposts and roadblocks.  N Engl J Med. 2005;  353(1) 1-5
• 19 Robertson J A. Compensation and egg donation for research.  Fertil Steril. 2006;  86(6) 1573-1575
• 20 Beeson D, Lippman A. Egg harvesting for stem cell research: medical risks and ethical problems.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;  13(4) 573-579
• 21 The Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine . Financial incentives in recruitment of oocyte donors.  Fertil Steril. 2000;  74(2) 216-220
• 22 Mertes H, Pennings G. Oocyte donation for stem cell research.  Hum Reprod. 2007;  22(3) 629-634
• 23 Kanakas N, Mantzavinos T. Fertility drugs and gynecologic cancer.  Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;  1092 265-278
• 24 Brinton L A, Moghissi K S, Scoccia B, Westhoff C L, Lamb E J. Ovulation induction and cancer risk.  Fertil Steril. 2005;  83(2) 261-274 quiz 525-526
• 25 United States Department of Health & Human Services .Code of Federal Regulations, 2005. Title 45 Public Welfare, Part 46
• 26 Ripley E. A review of paying research participants: it's time to move beyond the ethical debate.  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2006;  1(4) 9-20
• 27 Emanuel E J. Ending concerns about undue inducement.  J Law Med Ethics. 2004;  32(1) 100-105
• 28 Ethics Committee, American Society for Reproductive Medicine . Financial compensation of oocyte donors.  Fertil Steril Ethics Committee Report. 2007;  88(2) 305-309
• 29 Vogel G. Ethical oocytes: available for a price.  Science. 2006;  313 155
• 30 Ethics Committee .American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Using preimplantation embryos for research. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee Opinion No. 347. 2006. Available at: http://www.acog.org/from_home/publications/ethics/co347.pdf Accessed September 2, 2009
• 31 Klitzman R, Sauer M V. Payment of egg donors in stem cell research in the USA.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;  18(5) 603-608
• 32 Empire State Stem Cell Board .Statement of the ESSCB on the compensation of oocyte donors. Available at: http://www.stemcell.ny.gov/docs/ESSCB_Statement_on_Compensation_of_Oocyte_Donors.pdf Accessed September 2, 2009
• 33 Dickert N, Grady C. What's the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation.  N Engl J Med. 1999;  341(3) 198-203
• 34 Klitzman R, Albala I, Siragusa J, Nelson K, Appelbaum P. The reporting of monetary compensation in research articles.  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2007;  2(4) 61-67
• 35 Kliff S. Golden eggs: when donation funds an education.  Newsweek. 2007;  http://Available at: www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12209274/site/newsweekpage/4/print/1/display.
• 36 Seibel M M, Kiessling A. Compensating egg donors: equal pay for equal time?.  N Engl J Med. 1993;  328(10) 737
• 37 Klitzman R. Views of the process and content of reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US Institutional Review Boards and South African Research Ethics Committees. Dev World Bioeth 2007 Available at: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1471-8847.2007.00189.x Accessed September 2, 2009
• 38 Goldman J, Katz M I. Inconsistency and institutional review boards.  JAMA. 1982;  248(2) 197-202
• 39 Eaton W O. Reliability in ethical reviews: some initial empirical findings.  Can Psychol. 1983;  24(1) 14-18
• 40 Doob A N. The reliability of ethical reviews: is it desirable?.  Can Psychol. 1983;  24(4) 269-270
• 41 Veatch R M. Problems with institutional review board inconsistency.  JAMA. 1982;  248(2) 179-180
• 42 Klitzman R, Albala I, Siragusa J et al. Disclosure of information to potential subjects on research recruitment websites. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 2008 Jan–Feb:15–20