PDF icon Download PDF
Evid Based Spine Care J 2011; 2(3): 53-54
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1267114
Selected Abstracts Delivered at the 9th Annual AOSpine North America Fellows Forum
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Patient and surgeon factors associated with postoperative kyphosis after laminoplasty

Joshua Ellwitz1 , Rolando Roberto2 , Munish Gupta2 , Vivek Mohan3 , Eric Klineberg2
  • 1 1HCMW Spine and Scoliosis Center, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA
  • 2 2UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA
  • 3 3Complete Orthopaedic Care, Lincolnshire, Illinois, USA
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 December 2011 (online)

Also available ateRef
  Permissions and Reprints
Preview

INTRODUCTION

Expansive cervical laminoplasty began its evolution in the 1970s in Japan for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy secondary to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament or cervical spondylosis. The goal of the procedure is to reduce the complications associated with the inherent destabilization associated with laminectomy while preserving cervical spine range of motion [1].

It has also been established in the literature that preoperative kyphotic deformity is a risk factor for poor surgical outcome and neurological recovery [2], [3]. We hypothesize that meticulous preservation of the interspinous ligaments may help prevent iatrogenic kyphosis.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Subramaniam V, Chamberlain R H, Theodore N. et al . Biomechanical effects of laminoplasty versus laminectomy: stenosis and stability.  Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;  34 E573-578
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Ratliff J K, Cooper P R. Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review.  J Neurosurg. 2003;  98 (suppl 3) 230-238
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Suda K, Abumi K, Ito M. et al . Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.  Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;  28 (12) 1258-1262
    Search in Google Scholar