Arzneimittelforschung 2009; 59(10): 521-525
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1296436
Anti-osteoporosis Drugs
Editio Cantor Verlag Aulendorf (Germany)

Two-way Crossover Bioequivalence Study of Alendronate Sodium Tablets in Healthy, Non-smoking Male Volunteers under Fasted Conditions

Nageshwar Rao Thudi
1   Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., Toronto, Ontario, (Canada)
,
Stéphanie Gagnon
2   Anapharm, Quebec City, Quebec, (Canada)
,
Saleh Hussain
2   Anapharm, Quebec City, Quebec, (Canada)
,
Zohreh Abolfathi
2   Anapharm, Quebec City, Quebec, (Canada)
,
Ajay Singla
3   Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Gurgaon, Haryana, (India)
,
Raveendra Pai
3   Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Gurgaon, Haryana, (India)
,
Sudershan Kumar
3   Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Gurgaon, Haryana, (India)
,
Tausif Monif
3   Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Gurgaon, Haryana, (India)
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
13 December 2011 (online)

Preview

Abstract

This study was conducted in order to assess the bioequivalence of two different formulations containing 70 mg alendronate sodium (CAS 121268-17-5) under fasted conditions. One hundred twenty-two healthy male volunteers were enrolled in an open label, randomized, crossover design with a wash-out period of 20 days in one study center. Urine samples were collected up to 36 h post-dose, and the concentrations of alendronic acid were determined using a high performance liquid chromatographic method with pre-derivatization and fluorescence detection (HPLC/FL) method. The mean Ae0–t were 604.24 ± 348.73 µg and 627.36 ± 327.99 µg, while the mean Rmax were 193.87 ± 114.68 µg/h and 202.00 ± 107.83 µg/h for the test and reference formulations, respectively. The Tmax of the test and reference tablets were 1.26 ± 0.58 h and 1.26 ± 0.51 h, respectively. No significant differences of pharmacokinetic parameters between the two studied formulations were found. The 90% confidence intervals for the primary target parameters, intra-individual ratios for Ae0–t and Rmax of alendronic acid, were between 0.86–1.00 and 0.85–1.01, respectively, and thus within the acceptance range for bioequivalence criteria. In the light of the present study it can be concluded that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation.