Obesity and early reoperation rate after elective lumbar spine surgery: a population-based study

ABSTRACT

Study design: Population-based retrospective cohort study.

Clinical question: Are patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 35 or more who undergo elective lumbar spine surgery at increased risk of post-surgical complications, as evidenced by reoperation within a 3-month period?

Methods: The Alberta Health and Wellness Administrative database was queried to identify patients who underwent elective lumbar spine surgery over a 24-month period. This same database was used to classify subjects as obese (BMI ≥35) and non-obese (BMI <35) and to determine who underwent repeated surgical intervention. The rate of reoperation was determined for both the obese and non-obese groups; further analyses were performed to determine whether certain subjects were at increased risk of reoperation.

Results: The point estimate for relative risk for requiring reoperation was 1.73 (95% confidence interval, 1.03–2.90) for obese subjects compared with non-obese subjects. The adjusted point estimate shows that deformity correction surgery is predictive for early reoperation while obesity is not.

Conclusions: In obese subjects we observed an increased complication rate after elective lumbar spine surgery, as evidenced by reoperation rates within 3 months. When we considered other possible associations with reoperation, in adjusted analysis, deformity surgery was found to be predictive of early reoperation.

The definiton of the different classes of evidence is available here.

• REFERENCES

• 1 Andreshak TG, An HS, Hall J et al. 1997; Lumbar spine surgery in the obese patient. J Spinal Disord 10 (5) 376-379
• 2 Wimmer C, Gluch H, Franzreb M et al. 1998; Predisposing factors for infection in spine surgery: a survey of 850 spinal procedures. J Spinal Disord 11 (2) 124-128
• 3 Telfeian AE, Reiter GT, Durham SR et al. 2002; Spine surgery in morbidly obese patients. J Neurosurg Spine 97 (Suppl. 01) 20-24
• 4 Olsen MA, Mayfield J, Lauryssen C et al. 2003; Risk factors for surgical site infection in spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 98 (Suppl. 02) 149-155
• 5 Gepstein R, Shabat S, Arinzon ZH et al. 2004; Does obesity affect the results of lumbar decompressive spinal surgery in the elderly?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426: 138-144
• 6 Patel N, Bagan B, Vadera S et al. 2007; Obesity and spine surgery: relation to perioperative complications. J Neurosurg Spine 6 (4) 291-297
• 7 Shamji MF, Parker S, Cook C et al. 2009; Impact of body habitus on perioperative morbidity associated with fusion of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine. Neurosurgery 65 (3) 490-498
• 8 Peng CWB, Bendo JA, Goldstein JA et al. 2009; Perioperative outcomes of anterior lumbar surgery in obese versus non-obese patients. Spine J 9 (9) 715-720
• 9 Yadla S, Malone J, Campbell PG et al. 2010; Obesity and spine surgery: reassessment based on a prospective evaluation of perioperative complications in elective degenerative thoracolumbar procedures. Spine J 10: 581-587
• 10 Fanuele JC, Abdu WA, Hanscom B et al. 2002; Association between obesity and functional status in patients with spine disease. Spine 27 (3) 306-312
• 11 Statistics Canada 2005 Measured adult body mass index (BMI) by sex, household population aged 18 and over excluding pregnant females, Canada and provinces (table) Canadian Statistics. Available at: www.statcan.gc.ca Accessed June 11, 2010

• REFERENCE EDITORIAL PERSPECTIVE

• 1 Kalanithi PS, Arrigo R, Boakye M. 2011; Morbid obesity increases cost and complication rates in spinal arthrodesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [Epub ahead of print]
• 2 Koutsoumbelis S, Hughes AP, Girardi FP et al. 2011; Risk factors for postoperative infection following posterior lumbar instrumented arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93 (17) 1627-1633
• 3 Mehta AI, Babu R, Karikari IO et al. 2011; The distribution of body mass as a significant risk factor for lumbar spinal fusion postoperative infections. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). [Epub ahead of print]