Semin Hear 2012; 33(01): 053-064
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1304728
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Assisting Communication Partners in the Setting of Treatment Goals: The Development of the Goal Sharing for Partners Strategy

Jill E. Preminger
1   Program in Audiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
Christopher Lind
2   Speech Pathology and Audiology, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 March 2012 (online)


The Goal Sharing for Partners Strategy (GPS) is a tool for audiologists to use with patients with hearing loss (PHLs) and their communication partners (CPs). This strategy provides a framework that is designed to assist both the PHL and their CP to (1) acknowledge the hearing loss; (2) acknowledge the hearing loss-related activity limitations and participation restrictions that they each face as a result of the hearing loss; (3) acknowledge that they are partners in communication; and (4) develop an understanding of their shared responsibility in dealing with the hearing loss. The GPS is a shared goal-setting strategy that enables PHLs and their CPs to develop realistic mutually derived communication goals and to consider the steps necessary to achieve these goals. The purpose of this article is to outline the need for the GPS, to present the theoretical background for its development, and to describe the steps necessary to use this new tool. Both a step-by-step GPS road map is described, as well as suggestions for using the GPS as a framework for including CPs in the audiological rehabilitation process.

  • References

  • 1 Danermark B, Cieza A, Gangé JP , et al. International classification of functioning, disability, and health core sets for hearing loss: a discussion paper and invitation. Int J Audiol 2010; 49: 256-262
  • 2 World Health Organization. ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001
  • 3 Erber NP, Lind C. Communication therapy: Theory and practice. J Acad Rehab Audiol 1994; 27 (Mono Suppl) 267-287
  • 4 Erber NP. Hearing, Vision, Communication, and Older People. Clifton Hill, Victoria, Australia: Clavis Publishing; 2002
  • 5 Tye-Murray N. Foundations of Aural Rehabilitation: Children, Adults, and Their Family Members. 3rd ed. Clifton Park, NY: Delman Cengage Learning; 2009
  • 6 Rubinstein A, Boothroyd A. Effect of two approaches to auditory training on speech recognition by hearing-impaired adults. J Speech Hear Res 1987; 30: 153-160
  • 7 Kaplan H, Bally S, Garretson C. Speech reading: A Way to Improve Understanding. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press; 1985
  • 8 Tye-Murray N, Witt S, Schum L, Sobaski C. Communication breakdowns: partner contingencies and partner reactions. J Acad Rehab Audiol 1994; 27: 107-133
  • 9 Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: a new tool. Ear Hear 1982; 3: 128-134
  • 10 Newman CW, Weinstein BE. The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly as a measure of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 1988; 9: 81-85
  • 11 Preminger JE, Meeks S. The influence of mood on the perception of hearing-loss related quality of life in people with hearing loss and their significant others. Int J Audiol 2010; 49: 263-271
  • 12 Hallam R, Ashton P, Sherbourne K, Gailey L. Persons with acquired profound hearing loss (APHL): how do they and their families adapt to the challenge?. Health (London) 2008; 12: 369-388
  • 13 Scarinci N, Worrall L, Hickson L. The effect of hearing impairment in older people on the spouse. Int J Audiol 2008; 47: 141-151
  • 14 Gagné JP, Masterson V, Munhall KG, Bilida N, Querengesser C. Across talker variability in auditory, visual, and audiovisual speech intelligibility for conversational and clear speech. J Acad Rehab Audiol 1994; 27: 135-158
  • 15 Michael DD, Siegel GM, Pick Jr HL. Effects of distance on vocal intensity. J Speech Hear Res 1995; 38: 1176-1183
  • 16 Pedlow R, Wales R. Some effects of context on spoken language production. Lang Speech 1987; 30: 373-385
  • 17 Picheny MA, Durlach NI, Braida LD. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech. J Speech Hear Res 1985; 28: 96-103
  • 18 Schum DJ. Intelligibility of clear and conversational speech of young and elderly talkers. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7: 212-218
  • 19 Schegloff EA, Jefferson G, Sacks H. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 1977; 53: 361-382
  • 20 Kiresuk TJ, Sherman RE. Goal attainment scaling: a general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Ment Health J 1968; 4: 443-453
  • 21 Kiresuk TJ. Goal attainment scaling at a county mental health service. Evaluation 1973; Mo 1: 12-18
  • 22 Cytrynbaum S, Ginath Y, Birdwell J, Brandt L. Goal attainment scaling: a critical review. Eval Q 1979; 3: 5-40
  • 23 McKenna L. Goal planning in audiological rehabilitation. Br J Audiol 1987; 21: 5-11
  • 24 Levack WM, Taylor K, Siegert RJ, Dean SG, McPherson KM, Weatherall M. Is goal planning in rehabilitation effective? A systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 739-755
  • 25 Duncan KA, Pozehl B. Staying on course: the effects of an adherence facilitation intervention on home exercise participation. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs 2002; 17: 59-65, 71
  • 26 Scott LD, Setter-Kline K, Britton AS. The effects of nursing interventions to enhance mental health and quality of life among individuals with heart failure. Appl Nurs Res 2004; 17: 248-256
  • 27 Webb PM, Glueckauf RL. The effects of direct involvement in goal setting on rehabilitation outcome for persons with traumatic brain injuries. Rehabil Psychol 1994; 39: 179-188
  • 28 Joosten EA, DeFuentes-Merillas L, de Weert GH, Sensky T, van der Staak CP, de Jong CA. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom 2008; 77: 219-226
  • 29 Laplante-Lévesque A, Hickson L, Worrall L. Factors influencing rehabilitation decisions of adults with acquired hearing impairment. Int J Audiol 2010; 49: 497-507
  • 30 Dillon H, James A, Ginis J. Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1997; 8: 27-43
  • 31 Chisolm T, Abrams H. Outcome measures and evidence-based practice. In: Hosford-Dunn H, Roesser R, Valente M, eds. Audiology: Practice Management. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme; 2008: 171-194
  • 32 Dillon H, So M. Incentives and obstacles to the routine use of outcomes measures by clinicians. Ear Hear 2000; 21 (4 Suppl) 2S-6S
  • 33 Weinstein BE, Ventry IM. Audiometric correlates of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the elderly. J Speech Hear Disord 1983; 48: 379-384
  • 34 Trychin S. Living with Hearing Loss: Workbook. 3rd ed. 2006. Available at: . Accessed February 6, 2012