Prospective experimental study of transrectal viscerotomy closure using transanal endoscopic suture vs. circular stapler: a step toward NOTES

Background and study aim: Endoluminal full-thickness closure of the rectal wall is critical in emerging procedures including endoscopic submucosal dissection and transrectal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). This study aimed to compare manual suture using the transanal endoscopic operation platform (TEO; Karl Storz, Tüttlingen, Germany) with the end-to-end anastomosis hemorrhoid circular stapler (EEA; Covidien, Dublin, Ireland) for closure of the rectal viscerotomy during transrectal NOTES segmental colectomy.

Materials and methods: A total of 12 swine underwent transrectal hybrid NOTES partial colectomies. Animals were divided into two groups according to the viscerotomy closure technique: 1) TEO manual suture; 2) EEA circular stapler closure.

Results: Mean (± SD) viscerotomy closure time was 67.5 ± 59.5 minutes and 31.5 ± 19.6 minutes for TEO and EEA, respectively. There was one conversion to laparoscopy in the TEO group and a misfiring in the EEA group that required a TEO salvage suture. There was one positive air-leak test in each group. Peritoneal fluid collected at the end of the procedure tested positive for bacterial contamination in all cases. A mild stenosis was present in 4 /6 viscerotomies (67 %) in the TEO group and in 1/6 (17 %) in the EEA group on endoscopic control. Inflammatory changes were mild in 3/5 (60 %) and 4/5 (80 %) viscerotomies in the TEO and EEA groups, respectively, whereas severe inflammation was found in 2/5 (TEO) and 1 /5 (EEA).

Conclusion: Transrectal viscerotomy closure using the EEA circular stapler technique is feasible, easy to perform, and histologically comparable to suture closure through a TEO platform. It may offer an attractive alternative for NOTES segmental colectomies and endoscopic resections.

• References

• 1 McGee MF, Rosen MJ, Marks J et al. A primer on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: building a new paradigm. Surg Innov 2006; 13: 86-93
• 2 Rattner D, Kalloo A. ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 329-333
• 3 Ramwell A, Evans J, Bignell M et al. The creation of a peritoneal defect in transanal endoscopic microsurgery does not increase complications. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11: 964-966
• 4 Demartines N, von Flue MO, Harder FH. Transanal endoscopic microsurgical excision of rectal tumors: indications and results. World J Surg 2001; 25: 870-875
• 5 Mathews JC, Chin MS, Fernandez-Esparrach G et al. Early healing of transcolonic and transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery access sites. J Am Coll Surg 210: 480-490
• 6 Pai RD, Fong DG, Bundga ME et al. Transcolonic endoscopic cholecystectomy: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 428-434
• 7 Wilhelm D, Meining A, von Delius S et al. An innovative, safe and sterile sigmoid access (ISSA) for NOTES. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 401-406
• 8 Leroy J, Diana M, Perretta S et al. Original technique to close the transrectal viscerotomy access in a NOTES transrectal and transgastric segmental colectomy. Surg Innovation 2011; 18: 193-200
• 9 Leroy J, Costantino F, Cahill RA et al. Fully laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis involving percutaneous endoluminal colonic anvil control (PECAC). Surg Innov 2010; 17: 79-84
• 10 Yau K. Transanal endoscopic operation (TEO). The Hong Kong Medical Diary 2009; 14: 13-16
• 11 Buess G, Theiss R, Gunther M et al. Endoscopic surgery in the rectum. Endoscopy 1985; 17: 31-35
• 12 Whiteford MH, Denk PM, Swanstrom LL. Feasibility of radical sigmoid colectomy performed as natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 1870-1874
• 13 Sylla P, Willingham FF, Sohn DK et al. NOTES rectosigmoid resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) with transgastric endoscopic assistance: a pilot study in swine. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12: 1717-1723
• 14 Trunzo JA, Delaney CP. Natural orifice proctectomy using a transanal endoscopic microsurgical technique in a porcine model. Surg Innov 17: 48-52
• 15 Fajardo AD, Hunt SR, Fleshman JW et al. Video. Transanal single-port low anterior resection in a cadaver model. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 1765
• 16 Leroy J, Cahill RA, Asakuma M et al. Single-access laparoscopic sigmoidectomy as definitive surgical management of prior diverticulitis in a human patient. Arch Surg 2009; 144: 173-179
• 17 Saito Y, Sakamoto T, Fukunaga S et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal tumors. Dig Endosc 2009; 21 Suppl 1: 7-12
• 18 Fujishiro M. Perspective on the practical indications of endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal neoplasms. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 4289-4295
• 19 Yoshida N, Yagi N, Naito Y et al. Safe procedure in endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors focused on preventing complications. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 1688-1695
• 20 Ballantyne GH, Burke JB, Rogers G et al. Accelerated wound healing with stapled enteric suture lines. An experimental study comparing traditional sewing techniques and a stapling device. Ann Surg 1985; 201: 360-364
• 21 Graffner H, Andersson L, Lowenhielm P et al. The healing process of anastomoses of the colon. A comparative study using single, double-layer or stapled anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1984; 27: 767-771
• 22 Buchmann P, Schneider K, Gebbers JO. Fibrosis of experimental colonic anastomosis in dogs after EEA stapling or suturing. Dis Colon Rectum 1983; 26: 217-220
• 23 Jansson OK, Zilling TL, Walther BS. Healing of colonic anastomoses: comparative experimental study of glued, manually sutured, and stapled anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 557-562
• 24 Durdey P, Bucknall TE. Assessment of sutures for use in colonic surgery: an experimental study. J R Soc Med 1984; 77: 472-477