Download PDF
Endoscopy 2012; 44(09): 849-854
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1310046
DDW Highlights
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic ultrasonography

T. B. Gardner
Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
01 August 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Introduction

The 2012 Digestive Disease Week (DDW; 19 – 22 May 2012, San Diego, California, USA) featured exciting research from the field of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). The research highlights continued to focus on tissue acquisition and interventional EUS. Although overall there were fewer novel EUS applications presented, the quality of research, as evidenced by more prospective randomized trials, was generally higher than in previous years. In this review, the top 20 EUS abstracts from DDW 2012 are identified and key aspects are discussed.

 

  • References

  • 1 Wani S, Early DS, Kunkel J et al. The diagnostic yield of malignancy during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid lesions with and without a stylet: a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB128-AB129
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Shin EJ, Topazian M, Syngal S et al. Radial versus linear and second look endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) improved detection of pancreatic lesions: a randomized tandem study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB131
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Chen AM, Pai R, Friedland S et al. Comparison of EUS-guided pancreas biopsy techniques using the Procore™ needle. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB145
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Pausawasdi N, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Sriprayoon T et al. Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the evaluation of intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy of unknown etiology. Gastroenterology 2012; 142: 23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Rao AS, Abu Dayyeh BK, Lopes T et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and fine needle aspiration with noninvasive imaging for the detection of omental metastases. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB131
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Fukasawa M, Takano S, Kadokura M et al. Quantitative perfusion analysis of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography in solid lesions of the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB132
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Iglesias-Garcia J, Lindkvist B, Cruz-Soares JB et al. Differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound, quantitative-elastography endoscopic ultrasound or both?. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB147
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Artifon EL, Gupta K, Aparicio DP et al. An interim analysis comparing EUS-guided anterograde ureteral internal drainage versus percutaneous nephrostomy in patients with advanced bladder cancer and renal failure: a prospective and randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB128
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Romero-Castro R, Ortiz-Moyano C, Carlos Subtil J et al. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided therapy of gastric varices. Results from a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB129
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sethi A, Ellrichmann M, Dhar S et al. EUS-guided lymph node ablation with novel radiofrequency ablation probe: a feasibility study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB147
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gaidhane M, Smith IB, Ellen K et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) of the pancreas in a porcine model: a novel palliative option?. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB193
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Tarantino I, Fabbri C, Di Mitri R et al. Final results on interventional endoscopic ultrasound complications: large prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB439
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Artifon EL, Silva R, Gupta K et al. EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy versus surgical drainage in patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction: a randomized prospective trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB162-AB163
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Dhir VK, Bhandari S, Bapat M et al. Comparison of intra-hepatic and extra-hepatic routes for EUS-guided rendezvous procedure for distal CBD obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB130-AB131
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Vohra S, Holt EW, Bhat YM et al. EUS-based ERCP reduces risk exposure in pregnant patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB183
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lutzak G, Kozarek RA, Irani S et al. Outcomes of attempted EUS-guided anterograde access of the pancreatic duct after failed ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB438
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lee NM, Brahmbhatt R, Gopal DV et al. 60 consecutive incidental pancreatic cysts referred to endoscopic ultrasound: cost of evaluation and outcome. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB204
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Song BJ, Paik WH, Kim J et al. Outcome of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided ethanol lavage for incidental pancreatic cysts. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB131-AB132
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Das A, Ellsworth E, Sachdev MS et al. Incidental pancreatic cystic neoplasm (PCN): management guided by molecular analysis of cyst fluid obtained by EUS-FNA is cheaper and more effective compared to management guided by cyst fluid cytology and carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) estimation. Gastroenterology 2012; 142: 207-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Wani S, Cote GA, Keswani RN et al. Learning curves for endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis: implications for American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) recommendations for training. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB432-AB434
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

    • Additional References

      • Tissue sampling and staging

      • 21 Wang W, Shapner A, Krishna SG et al. Utilization of EUS-FNA in diagnosing pancreatic neoplasms without definitive masses on CT scans. Gastroenterology 2012; 421: 22
        PubMedGoogle Scholar
      • 22 Al-Haddad M, Raijman I, Das A et al. Early clinical experience with a new EUS-guided 19-gauge flexible fine needle aspiration device: a multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB146
        CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
      • 23 Nakai Y, Iwashita T, Park DH et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic cysts: endoscopic ultrasound, through-the-needle confocal laser-induced endomicroscopy and cystoscopy trial (Detect Study). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB145-AB146
        PubMedGoogle Scholar
      • 24 Iglesias-Garcia J, Larino-Noia J, Macias M et al. A multicenter, prospective, comparative randomized open-trial of endoscopic ultrasound cytologic brushing vs. fine-needle aspiration for the pathological diagnosis of cystic pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB181
        PubMedGoogle Scholar

      • Contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS

      • 25 Rim KN, Seo DW, Kim TG et al. Contrast enhanced harmonic-endoscopic ultrasound in gallbladder and bile duct lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB192
        PubMedGoogle Scholar
      • 26 Gheonea DI, Streba CT, Ioncica AM et al. Diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses by quantitative low mechanical index contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB205
        PubMedGoogle Scholar

      • Interventional EUS

      • 27 Kumar N, Spofford IS, Thompson CC. Health care utilization comparison of direct endoscopic necrosectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for management of walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB129-AB130
        PubMedGoogle Scholar
      • 28 Kumar N, Spofford IS, Thompson CC. Endoscopic versus surgical necrosectomy for management of walled-off pancreatic necrosis: a health care utilization comparison. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB130
        PubMedGoogle Scholar
      • 29 Di Matteo F, Martino M, Panzera F et al. EUS-guided Nd:YAG laser ablation of normal pancreatic tissue: a survival study in porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB195-AB196
        PubMedGoogle Scholar
      • 30 Giovannini M, Pesenti C, Bories E et al. EUS-guided hepatico-gastrostomy using a new design partially covered stent (GIOBOR stent). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB441
        PubMedGoogle Scholar

      • EUS-guided pancreaticobiliary access

      • 31 Chang K, Kaji K, Suzuki T et al. EUS-guided choledocho-duodenostomy in the treatment of biliary obstruction using prototype compression coil and twin-headed needle: final pre-clinical results. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB182-AB183
        CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
      • 32 Fusaroli P, Eloubeidi MA, Kypraios D et al. Pancreaticobiliary EUS: a systematic review of current indications, test performance, and clinical outcome according to levels of evidence. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB184-AB185
        PubMedGoogle Scholar

      • Pancreatic cystic lesions

      • 33 Sreenarasimhaiah J, Kandunoori P, Patel A et al. Long-term follow-up of indeterminate pancreatic cysts initially examined by endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB132
        PubMedGoogle Scholar
      • 34 Kwon RS, Anderson MA, Minter R et al. EUS is a more effective diagnostic tool than cross-sectional imaging to identify malignant IPMN. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB190
        PubMedGoogle Scholar
      • 35 Gonzalez I, Tang RS, Munroe CA et al. Natural history of pancreatic cysts <6 cm with benign EUS appearance without surgical resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: AB209
        PubMedGoogle Scholar