Self-expandable metal stents as a new treatment option for perforated duodenal ulcer

Primary stenting and drainage has been shown to be an effective and safe way to treat esophageal perforations and anastomotic leaks after gastric bypass surgery. We present a case series of eight patients with perforated duodenal ulcers treated with covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS). The first two patients received their stents because of postoperative leakage after initial traditional surgical closure. The following six patients had SEMS placed as primary treatment due to co-morbidities or technical surgical difficulties. Endoscopy and stent treatment in these six patients was performed at a median of 3 days (range, 0 – 7 days) after initial symptoms. Six patients had percutaneous abdominal drainage. Early oral intake, 0 – 7 days after stent placement, was possible. All patients except one recovered without complications and were discharged 9 – 36 days after stent placement. This series indicates that primary treatment with SEMS and drainage might be an alternative to surgery in patients with perforated ulcer disease.

• References

• 1 Lau JY, Sung J, Hill C et al. Systematic review of the epidemiology of complicated peptic ulcer disease: incidence, recurrence, risk factors and mortality. Digestion 2011; 84: 102-113
• 2 Alizadeh N, Buhler L, Huber O et al. Conservative treatment of gastroduodenal peptic ulcer perforations: indications and results [in French]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr Suppl 1997; 89: 17S-19S
• 3 van Boeckel PG, Sijbring A, Vleggaar FP et al. Systematic review: temporary stent placement for benign rupture or anastomotic leak of the oesophagus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 33: 1292-1301
• 4 Eubanks S, Edwards CA, Fearing NM et al. Use of endoscopic stents to treat anastomotic complications after bariatric surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 206: 935-938 ; discussion 938–939
• 5 Møller MH, Adamsen S, Thomsen RW et al. Preoperative prognostic factors for mortality in peptic ulcer perforation: a systematic review. Scand J Gastroenterol 2010; 45: 785-805
• 6 Pescatore P, Halkic N, Calmes JM et al. Combined laparoscopic-endoscopic method using an omental plug for therapy of gastroduodenal ulcer perforation. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 411-414
• 7 Bergstrom M, Swain P, Park PO. Early clinical experience with a new flexible endoscopic suturing method for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and intraluminal endosurgery (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 528-533
• 8 Kantsevoy SV, Thuluvath PJ. Successful closure of a chronic refractory gastrocutaneous fistula with a new endoscopic suturing device (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 688-690
• 9 Johnsson E, Lundell L, Liedman B. Sealing of esophageal perforation or ruptures with expandable metallic stents: a prospective controlled study on treatment efficacy and limitations. Dis Esophagus 2005; 18: 262-266
• 10 Shou J, Motyka LE, Daly JM. Intestinal microbial translocation: immunologic consequences and effects of interleukin-4. Surgery 1994; 116: 868-876