Download PDF
Semin Hear 2013; 34(01): 037-050
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1333150
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Cochlear Dead Regions in Adults and Children: Diagnosis and Clinical Implications

Brian C. J. Moore
1   Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
,
Alicja N. Malicka
2   School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 January 2013 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The inner hair cells (IHCs) are the transducers of the cochlea; they convert mechanical vibrations to neural activity. When the IHCs and/or neurons are nonfunctioning over a certain region of the cochlea, this is referred to as a dead region. A dead region can be defined in terms of the characteristic frequencies of the IHCs and/or neurons immediately adjacent to the dead region. Dead regions can be detected, and their limits can be determined, using the threshold equalizing noise (TEN) test or by measurement of psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs). Both PTCs and the TEN test can be used to assess children as young as 7 years of age. The identification of dead regions can be helpful in determining the appropriate form of amplification. For both adults and children with restricted dead regions (“holes”), benefit is obtained from amplification of frequencies up to at least 4 kHz. For adults and children with extensive continuous dead regions starting at a relatively low frequency (≤ 1.5 kHz) there may be little or no benefit from amplification of high frequencies.

Keywords

dead region - TEN test - psychophysical tuning curve - amplification - hearing aid
 

  • References

  • 1 Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR. A model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Aud Neurosci 1997; 3: 289-311
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Moore BCJ, Huss M, Vickers DA, Glasberg BR, Alcántara JI. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Br J Audiol 2000; 34: 205-224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Moore BCJ. Dead regions in the cochlea: diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing aids. Trends Amplif 2001; 5: 1-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Moore BCJ. Dead regions in the cochlea: conceptual foundations, diagnosis, and clinical applications. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 98-116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Greenwood DD. Critical bandwidth and the frequency coordinates of the basilar membrane. J Acoust Soc Am 1961; 33: 1344-1356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Greenwood DD. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species—29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87: 2592-2605
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Moore BCJ. Parallels between frequency selectivity measured psychophysically and in cochlear mechanics. Scand Audiol Suppl 1986; 25 (Suppl. 25) 139-152
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Vickers DA, Moore BCJ, Baer T. Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110: 1164-1175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Baer T, Moore BCJ, Kluk K. Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112 (3 Pt 1) 1133-1144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Vinay, Moore BCJ. Speech recognition as a function of highpass filter cutoff frequency for people with and without low-frequency cochlear dead regions. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 122: 542-553
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Vinay, Baer T, Moore BCJ. Speech recognition in noise as a function of highpass-filter cutoff frequency for people with and without low-frequency cochlear dead regions. J Acoust Soc Am 2008; 123: 606-609
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Moore BCJ, Alcántara JI. The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the cochlea. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 268-278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Shannon RV, Galvin III JJ, Baskent D. Holes in hearing. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2002; 3: 185-199
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Vinay, Moore BCJ. Psychophysical tuning curves and recognition of highpass and lowpass filtered speech for a person with an inverted V-shaped audiogram (L). J Acoust Soc Am 2010; 127: 660-663
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Chistovich LA. Frequency characteristics of masking effect. Biofizika 1957; 2: 743-755
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Small AM. Pure-tone masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1959; 31: 1619-1625
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Vogten LLM. Pure-tone masking: a new result from a new method. In: Zwicker E, Terhardt E, , eds. Facts and Models in Hearing. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1974: 142-155
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Moore BCJ. Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 63: 524-532
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kluk K, Moore BCJ. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for normally hearing subjects. Hear Res 2004; 194: 118-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Thornton AR, Abbas PJ. Low-frequency hearing loss: perception of filtered speech, psychophysical tuning curves, and masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: 638-643
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Florentine M, Houtsma AJM. Tuning curves and pitch matches in a listener with a unilateral, low-frequency hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73: 961-965
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Turner CW, Burns EM, Nelson DA. Pure tone pitch perception and low-frequency hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73: 966-975
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Moore BCJ, Vickers DA, Plack CJ, Oxenham AJ. Inter-relationship between different psychoacoustic measures assumed to be related to the cochlear active mechanism. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 106: 2761-2778
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Summers V, Molis MR, Müsch H, Walden BE, Surr RK, Cord MT. Identifying dead regions in the cochlea: psychophysical tuning curves and tone detection in threshold-equalizing noise. Ear Hear 2003; 24: 133-142
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kluk K, Moore BCJ. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for hearing-impaired subjects with high-frequency dead regions. Hear Res 2005; 200: 115-131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kluk K, Moore BCJ. Detecting dead regions using psychophysical tuning curves: a comparison of simultaneous and forward masking. Int J Audiol 2006; 45: 463-476
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Malicka AN, Munro KJ, Baker RJ. Diagnosing cochlear dead regions in children. Ear Hear 2010; 31: 238-246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Glasberg BR, Moore BCJ. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res 1990; 47: 103-138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Hoekstra A, Ritsma RJ. Perceptive hearing loss and frequency selectivity. In: Evans EF, Wilson JP, , eds. Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing. London, England: Academic; 1977: 263-271
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Zwicker E. On the psychophysical equivalent of tuning curves. In: Zwicker E, Terhardt E, , eds. Facts and Models in Hearing. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1974: 132-140
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Sek A, Alcántara JI, Moore BCJ, Kluk K, Wicher A. Development of a fast method for determining psychophysical tuning curves. Int J Audiol 2005; 44: 408-420
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Sęk A, Moore BCJ. Implementation of a fast method for measuring psychophysical tuning curves. Int J Audiol 2011; 50: 237-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR, Stone MA. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 478-487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Moore BCJ. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing, 6th Ed. Bingley, UK: Emerald; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Moore BCJ, Creeke S, Glasberg BR, Stone MA, Sek A. A version of the TEN Test for use with ER-3A insert earphones. Ear Hear 2012; 33: 554-557
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Aazh H, Moore BCJ. Dead regions in the cochlea at 4 kHz in elderly adults: relation to absolute threshold, steepness of audiogram, and pure-tone average. J Am Acad Audiol 2007; 18: 97-106
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Vinay, Moore BCJ. Prevalence of dead regions in subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 2007; 28: 231-241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Huss M, Moore BCJ. Tone decay for hearing-impaired listeners with and without dead regions in the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 114: 3283-3294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Preminger JE, Carpenter R, Ziegler CH. A clinical perspective on cochlear dead regions: intelligibility of speech and subjective hearing aid benefit. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16: 600-613 ; quiz 631–632
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Amos NE, Humes LE. The contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in sensorineural hearing loss. In: Breebaart DJ, Houtsma AJM, Kohlrausch A, Prijs VF, Schoonhoven R, , eds. Physiological and Psychophysical Bases of Auditory Function. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Shaker; 2001: 437-444
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Ching TY, Dillon H, Byrne D. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 103: 1128-1140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Hogan CA, Turner CW. High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 432-441
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Moore BCJ, Laurence RF, Wright D. Improvements in speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise produced by two-channel compression hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1985; 19: 175-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Murray N, Byrne D. Performance of hearing-impaired and normal hearing listeners with various high-frequency cut-offs in hearing aids. Aust J Audiol 1986; 8: 21-28
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Turner CW, Cummings KJ. Speech audibility for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. Am J Audiol 1999; 8: 47-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR. Use of a loudness model for hearing-aid fitting. I. Linear hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1998; 32: 317-335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Vestergaard MD. Dead regions in the cochlea: implications for speech recognition and applicability of articulation index theory. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 249-261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Mackersie CL, Crocker TL, Davis RA. Limiting high-frequency hearing aid gain in listeners with and without suspected cochlear dead regions. J Am Acad Audiol 2004; 15: 498-507
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Cox RM, Alexander GC, Johnson J, Rivera I. Cochlear dead regions in typical hearing aid candidates: prevalence and implications for use of high-frequency speech cues. Ear Hear 2011; 32: 339-348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Cox RM, Johnson JA, Alexander GC. Implications of high-frequency cochlear dead regions for fitting hearing AIDS to adults with mild to moderately severe hearing loss. Ear Hear 2012; 33: 573-587
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Malicka AN, Munro KJ, Baker RJ. Fast method for psychophysical tuning curve measurement in school-age children. Int J Audiol 2009; 48: 546-553
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Malicka AN, Munro KJ, Baer T, Baker RJ, Moore BCJ. The effect of low-pass filtering on identification of nonsense syllables in quiet by school-age children with and without cochlear dead regions. Ear Hear 2013; ; In press
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Cornelisse LE, Seewald RC, Jamieson DG. The input/output formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 1854-1864
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Summers V. Do tests for cochlear dead regions provide important information for fitting hearing aids?. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 115: 1420-1423
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 ANSI. ANSI S3.5–1997. Methods for the Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index. New York, NY: American National Standards Institute; 1997
    Google Scholar