Risk stratification to predict pain during unsedated colonoscopy: results of a multicenter cohort study

Background and study aims: Colonoscopy without sedation has several advantages over sedated colonoscopy, but a considerable proportion of patients experience pain. The aim of this study was to develop a risk stratification model of pre-examination risk factors to enable targeted sedation during colonoscopy.

Patients and methods: Between October 2011 and January 2012, consecutive outpatients who were willing to start colonoscopy without sedation at 11 Norwegian centers were prospectively recruited. Patients recorded pain on a validated 4-point scale (none, slight, moderate, or severe pain). Potential risk factors for a painful procedure (defined as moderate or severe pain) were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analyses, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) was calculated to assess the discriminatory ability of the derived model.

Results: A total of 1198 patients (635 men and 563 women) were included. Seven independent, pre-procedural risk factors for patient pain were identified: female sex, age < 40 years, previous abdominal surgery, abdominal pain as indication for colonoscopy, anticipation of pain, previous painful colonoscopy, and a history of diverticulitis. In patients with 0, 1, 2, or ≥ 3 risk factors, a painful colonoscopy was experienced by 35 %, 43 %, 52 %, and 63 % of women and 18 %, 24 %, 35 %, and 63 % of men, respectively. The model showed modest discrimination abilities (AUROC = 0.69).

Conclusion: Female sex was a strong risk factor for pain during colonoscopy, and sedation or analgesia should be considered for all women prior to colonoscopy. For male patients, the presence of multiple risk factors should encourage the endoscopist to offer sedation.

• References

• 1 Leung FW, Aljebreen AM, Brocchi E et al. Sedation-risk-free colonoscopy for minimizing the burden of colorectal cancer screening. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 2: 81-89
• 2 Takahashi Y, Tanaka H, Kinjo M et al. Sedation-free colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 855-859
• 3 East JE, Bassett P, Arebi N et al. Dynamic patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal increase adenoma detection: a randomized, crossover trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 456-463
• 4 East JE, Suzuki N, Arebi N et al. Position changes improve visibility during colonoscope withdrawal: a randomized, blinded, crossover trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 263-269
• 5 Brooker JC, Saunders BP, Shah SG et al. A new variable stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2000; 46: 801-805
• 6 Harikumar R, Raj M, Paul A et al. Listening to music decreases need for sedative medication during colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Indian J Gastroenterol 2006; 25: 3-5
• 7 Ramirez FC, Leung FW. A head-to-head comparison of the water vs. air method in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy. J Interv Gastroenterol 2011; 1: 130-135
• 8 Leung JW, Mann SK, Siao-Salera R et al. A randomized, controlled comparison of warm water infusion in lieu of air insufflation versus air insufflation for aiding colonoscopy insertion in sedated patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 505-510
• 9 Wu J, Hu B. The role of carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 128-136
• 10 Garborg KK, Loberg M, Matre J et al. Reduced pain during screening colonoscopy with an ultrathin colonoscope: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 740-746
• 11 Terruzzi V, Meucci G, Radaelli F et al. Routine versus “on demand” sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 169-174
• 12 Seip B, Bretthauer M, Dahler S et al. Patient satisfaction with on-demand sedation for outpatient colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 639-646
• 13 Eckardt AJ, Swales C, Bhattacharya K et al. Open access colonoscopy in the training setting: which factors affect patient satisfaction and pain?. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 98-105
• 14 Elphick DA, Donnelly MT, Smith KS et al. Factors associated with abdominal discomfort during colonoscopy: a prospective analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 21: 1076-1082
• 15 Takahashi Y, Tanaka H, Kinjo M et al. Prospective evaluation of factors predicting difficulty and pain during sedation-free colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 1295-1300
• 16 Park DI, Kim HJ, Park JH et al. Factors affecting abdominal pain during colonoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 19: 695-699
• 17 Chung YW, Han DS, Yoo KS et al. Patient factors predictive of pain and difficulty during sedation-free colonoscopy: a prospective study in Korea. Dig Liver Dis 2007; 39: 872-876
• 18 Speroni KG, Hannah J, Atherton M et al. Evaluation of demographic, behavioral, and procedural factors on pain perception by patients undergoing colonoscopy and moderate sedation. Gastroenterol Nurs 2005; 28: 502-508
• 19 Hoff G, Bretthauer M, Huppertz-Hauss G et al. The Norwegian Gastronet project: Continuous quality improvement of colonoscopy in 14 Norwegian centres. Scand J Gastroenterol 2006; 41: 481-487
• 20 Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD et al. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 1480-1491
• 21 Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain 1986; 27: 117-126
• 22 Holme O, Hoie O, Matre J et al. Magnetic endoscopic imaging versus standard colonoscopy in a routine colonoscopy setting: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 1215-1222
• 23 Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 1980; 9: 1043-1069
• 24 Paggi S, Radaelli F, Amato A et al. Unsedated colonoscopy: an option for some but not for all. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 392-398
• 25 Ylinen ER, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Pietila AM et al. Medication-free colonoscopy – factors related to pain and its assessment. J Adv Nurs 2009; 65: 2597-2607
• 26 Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff GS, Sauar J et al. Patient tolerance of colonoscopy without sedation during screening examination for colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 606-610
• 27 Cataldo PA. Colonoscopy without sedation. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 257-261
• 28 Sint NicolaasJ, de Jonge V, Korfage IJ et al. Benchmarking patient experiences in colonoscopy using the Global Rating Scale. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 462-472
• 29 Kim WH, Cho YJ, Park JY et al. Factors affecting insertion time and patient discomfort during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 600-605
• 30 Macken E, Gevers AM, Hendrickx A et al. Midazolam versus diazepam in lipid emulsion as conscious sedation for colonoscopy with or without reversal of sedation with flumazenil. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 47: 57-61
• 31 Hassan C, Benamouzig R, Spada C et al. Cost effectiveness and projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening in France. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 780-793