Download PDF
physioscience 2013; 9(3): 127
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1350272
gelesen und kommentiert
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

A Literature Review Reveals that Trials Evaluating Treatment of Non-Specific Low Back Pain Use Inconsistent Criteria to Identify Serious Pathologies and Nerve Root Involvement

Eine Literaturübersicht zeigt, dass Studien zur Beurteilung der Behandlung unspezifischer Rückenschmerzen uneinheitliche Kriterien verwenden, um ernsthafte Pathologien und Nervenwurzelbeteiligung zu identifizieren
F. Morrison
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 September 2013 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Williams C, Hancock MJ, Ferreira M, Ferreira P, Maher CG. JMMT 2012; 20: 59 – 65

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Deyo R, Battie M, Beurskens AJ et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research: a proposal for standardized use. Spine 1998; 23: 2003-2013
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Dionne CE, Dunn KM, Croft PR et al. A consensus approach towards the standardization of back pain definitions for use in prevalence studies. Spine 2008; 33: 95-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Jackson A, Hettinga DM, Mead J et al. Using consensus methods in developing clinical guidelines for exercise in managing persistent low back pain. Physiotherapy 2009; 94: 302-313
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Jette DU, Halbert J, Iverson C et al. Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications. Physical Therapy 2009; 89: 125-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar