Endosc Int Open 2014; 02(02): E46-E50
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1365524
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

How commonly is upper gastrointestinal cancer missed at endoscopy? A meta-analysis

Shyam Menon
1   Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
,
Nigel Trudgill
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Sandwell General Hospital, West Bromwich, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 08 October 2013

accepted after revision 17 February 2014

Publication Date:
07 May 2014 (online)

Background and study aims: Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer in the Western world usually presents at an advanced stage, when opportunities for curative therapy are limited. The failure to detect subtle, early-stage UGI cancer at endoscopy may contribute to a poor prognosis. We undertook a meta-analysis of studies of endoscopic miss rates for UGI cancer to quantify how often opportunities to diagnose cancer at an earlier stage are missed.

Patients and methods: A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify relevant studies, and a meta-analysis was conducted. “Missed” UGI cancer was defined as cancer that had not been diagnosed by UGI endoscopy performed within 3 years before the diagnosis. Random effects meta-analysis was used to determine the event rate of missed UGI cancer.

Results: Ten studies were identified that included 3,787 patients with UGI cancer. Four hundred eighty-seven UGI cancers were missed at endoscopy within 3 years before diagnosis. Marked heterogeneity was observed between studies (I 2, 94.4 %; P < 0.001). On random effects meta-analysis, the pooled miss rates were 6.4 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 4.3 % – 9.5 %) within 1 year and 11.3 % (95 % CI, 7.5 % – 16.6 %) within 3 years before diagnosis. There appeared to be no difference between the miss rates of oesophageal (44 %) and gastric (51 %) cancer (P = 0.42).

Conclusion It appears that 11.3 % of UGI cancers are missed at endoscopy up to 3 years before diagnosis. To ameliorate the poor prognosis of patients with UGI cancer in the Western world, efforts should be made to improve the quality of UGI endoscopy and create opportunities for earlier diagnosis.

 
  • References

  • 1 Cancer Research UK. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/cancerstats/types/oesophagus/survival/ and http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/cancerstats/types/stomach/ Accessed March 4, 2-13
  • 2 Bressler B, Paszat LF, Vinden C et al. Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 452-456
  • 3 Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z et al. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 96-102
  • 4 Hosokawa O, Tsuda S, Kidani E et al. Diagnosis of gastric cancer up to three years after negative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 669-674
  • 5 Amin A, Gilmour H, Graham L et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma missed at endoscopy. J R Coll Surg Edinb 2002; 47: 681-684
  • 6 Suvakovic Z, Bramble MG, Jones R et al. Improving the detection rate of early gastric cancer requires more than open access gastroscopy: a five year study. Gut 1997; 41: 308-313
  • 7 Yalamarthi S, Witherspoon P, McCole D et al. Missed diagnoses in patients with upper gastrointestinal cancers. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 874-879
  • 8 Voutilainen ME, Juhola MT. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of gastroscopy to detect gastric tumours: clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with gastric cancer missed on endoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 17: 1345-1349
  • 9 Raftopoulos SC, Segarajasingam DS, Burke V et al. A cohort study of missed and new cancers after esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 1292-1297
  • 10 Vradelis S, Maynard N, Warren BF et al. Quality control in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: detection rates of gastric cancer in Oxford 2005-2008. Postgrad Med J 2011; 87: 335-339
  • 11 Hosokawa O, Hattori M, Douden K et al. Difference in accuracy between gastroscopy and colonoscopy for detection of cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2007; 54: 442-444
  • 12 Milestone AN, Kent AJ, Goldin R et al. Missed upper gastrointestinal cancer at endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: A-312 S2080
  • 13 Vesey AT, Auld CD, McCole D. Missed upper gastrointestinal cancer at endoscopy: can performance be improved by specialists?. Gut 2012; 61: A151-A152
  • 14 Fujita S. Biology of early gastric carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract 1978; 163: 297-309
  • 15 Ang TL, Khor CJ, Gotoda T. Diagnosis and endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Singapore Med J 2010; 51: 93-100
  • 16 Kuo CH, Sheu BS, Kao AW et al. A defoaming agent should be used with pronase premedication to improve visibility in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 531-534
  • 17 Lal N, Bhasin DK, Malik AK et al. Optimal number of biopsy specimens in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the oesophagus. Gut 1992; 33: 724-726
  • 18 Tatsuta M, Iishi H, Okuda S et al. Prospective evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of gastrofiberscopic biopsy in diagnosis of gastric cancer. Cancer 1989; 63: 1415-1420
  • 19 Kontopantelis E, Springate DA, Reeves D. A re-analysis of the Cochrane Library data: the dangers of unobserved heterogeneity in meta-analyses. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e69930 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069930.