Download PDF
Endoscopy 2014; 46(09): 817
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1367670
Correction
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Comparison of prophylactic clip and endoloop application for the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding in pedunculated colonic polyps: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study

Authors

  • Jeong-Seon Ji

    1   Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea

  • Seung-Woo Lee

    2   Department of Internal Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Korea

  • Tae Ho Kim

    3   Department of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Korea

  • Young-Seok Cho

    4   Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Korea

  • Hyung-Keun Kim

    4   Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Korea

  • Kang-Moon Lee

    5   Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea

  • Sang-Woo Kim

    6   Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea

  • Hwang Choi

    1   Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 August 2014 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints
Preview

Correction to:

Comparison of prophylactic clip and endoloop application for the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding in pedunculated colonic polyps: a prospective, randomized, multicenter studyEndoscopy 2014; 46(09): 598-604
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1365515

Jeong-Seon Ji, Seung-Woo Lee, Tae Ho Kim et al. Comparison of prophylactic clip and endoloop application for the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding in pedunculated colonic polyps: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Endoscopy 2014: 46: 598–604.

The stalk diameter in Table 4 was incorrect. The correct table is inserted below.

Table 4

Bleeding risk according to stalk diameter.

Bleeding polyps
(n = 11)

Nonbleeding polyps
(n = 192)

Odds ratio

95 %CI

Stalk diameter ≤ 10 mm, n (%)

6 (54.5)

175 (91.1)

1.00

Stalk diameter > 10 mm, n (%)

5 (45.5)

17 (8.9)

8.57

2.36 – 31.07

CI, confidence interval.