Common Practices in Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Supported by Weak or No Evidence

Orhan Bukulmez

doi:10.1055/s-0034-1375175

Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, Table of Contents

Semin Reprod Med 2014; 32(04): 243-244
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1375175

Preface

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Common Practices in Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Supported by Weak or No Evidence

Orhan Bukulmez

¹Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Full Text

References

References
1 Humaidan P, Kol S, Engmann L, Benadiva C, Papanikolaou EG, Andersen CY ; Copenhagen GnRH Agonist Triggering Workshop Group. Should Cochrane reviews be performed during the development of new concepts?. Hum Reprod 2012; 27 (1) 6-8
2 Greenhalgh T. Outside the box: Why are Cochrane reviews so boring?. Br J Gen Pract 2012; 62 (600) 371
3 Fahey T, Smith SM, van de Laar F, Kenealy T, Arroll B. Cochrane reviews: relevant more than ever. Br J Gen Pract 2013; 63 (606) 10