Supratherapeutic anticoagulation at presentation is associated with reduced mortality in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage
submitted 23 April 2014
accepted 05 May 2014
10 July 2014 (online)
Introduction: Warfarin is a widely used and easily reversible anticoagulant. Although bleeding is more likely in warfarin users, it may also be more readily treated. This retrospective observational case-control study compares the outcome of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in warfarin users with a supratherapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) and outcome in non – warfarin users.
Patients and methods: Clinical and endoscopic data for patients presenting with overt upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage were collected between 23rd February 2001 and 12 October 2010. Patients with variceal hemorrhage were excluded. Warfarin users with a supratherapeutic INR (≥ 3.0) at presentation (supratherapeutic anticoagulation [SA] group) were matched to a cohort with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage not taking warfarin at presentation (control group). Patients were matched by age, sex, Rockall score, year of endoscopy, inpatient or outpatient status, and the presence of disseminated cancer at presentation. The incidence rates of major outcomes in the two groups were compared.
Results: A total of 128 patients (SA group) were matched to 135 control patients. The SA group patients were less likely to die within 30 days (6.25 % vs. 15.5 %, odds ratio = 0.36, P = 0.028 by Test for Equality of Proportions). There was a trend toward more surgery in the control group (5 % vs. 2 %), and rates of blood transfusion (77 % vs. 70 %) were similar in the two groups.
Conclusion: In patients presenting with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, a supratherapeutic INR at presentation due to warfarin use is associated with reduced mortality.
- 1 EAFT (European Atrial Fibrillation Trial) Study Group. Secondary prevention in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke. Lancet 1993; 342: 1255-1262
- 2 Warfarin versus aspirin for prevention of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation II Study. Lancet 1994; 343: 687-691
- 3 Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB et al. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Gut 1996; 38: 316-321
- 4 Thomopoulos KC, Mimidis KP, Theocharis GJ et al. Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on long-term oral anticoagulation therapy: endoscopic findings, clinical management and outcome. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11: 1365-1368
- 5 Choudari CP, Rajgopal C, Palmer KR. Acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage in anticoagulated patients: diagnoses and response to endoscopic treatment. Gut 1994; 35: 464-466
- 6 Forrest JA, Finlayson ND, Shearman DJ. Endoscopy in gastrointestinal bleeding. Lancet 1974; 2: 394-397
- 7 Laine L, Peterson WL. Bleeding peptic ulcer. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 717-727
- 8 The R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: The R Project for Statistical Computing; 2011 http://www.R-project.org Accessed May 9, 2014
- 9 Stanley AJ, Dalton HR, Blatchford O et al. Multicentre comparison of the Glasgow Blatchford and Rockall Scores in the prediction of clinical end-points after upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 34: 470-475
- 10 Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel Jr EL. ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 1978; 49: 239-243
- 11 Marmo R, Koch M, Cipolletta L et al. Predictive factors of mortality from nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 1639-1647 ; quiz 1648
- 12 Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB et al. Incidence of and mortality from acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the United Kingdom. Steering Committee and members of the National Audit of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage. BMJ 1995; 311: 222-226
- 13 Blatchford O, Davidson LA, Murray WR et al. Acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in west of Scotland: case ascertainment study. BMJ 1997; 315: 510-514
- 14 Lewis JD, Bilker WB, Brensinger C et al. Hospitalization and mortality rates from peptic ulcer disease and GI bleeding in the 1990s: relationship to sales of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acid suppression medications. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 2540-2549
- 15 Loperfido S, Baldo V, Piovesana E et al. Changing trends in acute upper-GI bleeding: a population-based study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 212-224
- 16 Sung JJY, Lau JYW, Ching JYL et al. Continuation of low-dose aspirin therapy in peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152: 1-9
- 17 Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1139-1151
- 18 Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 883-891
- 19 Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJV et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 981-992
- 20 Schulman S, Kearon C, Kakkar AK et al. Extended use of dabigatran, warfarin, or placebo in venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 709-718
- 21 Büller HR, Prins MH, Lensin AW. EINSTEIN-PE Investigators et al. Oral rivaroxaban for the treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1287-1297
- 22 Agnelli G, Buller HR, Cohen A et al. Oral apixaban for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 799-808
- 23 Weinz C, Schwarz T, Kubitza D et al. Metabolism and excretion of rivaroxaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor, in rats, dogs, and humans. Drug Metab Dispos 2009; 37: 1056-1064