Molecular features of colorectal polyps presenting Kudo’s type II mucosal crypt pattern: are they based on the same mechanism of tumorigenesis?

Background and study aims: The molecular features of serrated polyps (SPs) with hyperplastic crypt pattern, also called Kudo’s type II observed by chromoendoscopy, were evaluated.

Methods: The clinicopathological and molecular features of 114 SPs with a hyperplastic pit pattern detected under chromoendoscopy (five dysplastic SPs, 63 sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/Ps), 36 microvesicular hyperplastic polyps (MVHPs), and 10 goblet cell-rich hyperplastic polyps (GCHPs)) were examined. The frequency of KRAS and BRAF mutations and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) were investigated.

Results: Dysplastic SPs and SSA/Ps were frequently located in the proximal colon compared to others (SSA/Ps vs. MVHPs or GCHPs, P < 0.0001). No significant difference was found in the frequency of BRAF mutation among SPs apart from GCHP (60 % for dysplastic SPs, 44 % for SSA/Ps, 47 % for MVHPs, and 0 % for GCHPs). The frequency of CIMP was higher in dysplastic SPs or SSA/Ps than in MVHPs or GCHPs (60 % for dysplastic SPs, 56 % for SSA/Ps, 32 % for MVHPs, and 10 % for GCHPs) (SSA/Ps vs. GCHP, P = 0.0068). When serrated neoplasias (SNs) and MVHPs were classified into proximal and distal lesions, the frequency of CIMP was significantly higher in the proximal compared to the distal SNs (64 % vs. 11 %, P = 0.0032). Finally, multivariate analysis showed that proximal location and BRAF mutation were significantly associated with an increased risk of CIMP.

Conclusions: Distinct molecular features were observed between proximal and distal SPs with hyperplastic crypt pattern. Proximal MVHPs may develop more frequently through SSA/Ps to CIMP cancers than distal MVHPs.

• References

• 1 Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010; 127: 2893-2917
• 2 Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer. Cell 1996; 87: 159-170
• 3 Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell 1990; 61: 759-767
• 4 Jass JR. Classification of colorectal cancer based on correlation of clinical, morphological and molecular features. Histopathology 2007; 50: 113-130
• 5 Leggett B, Whitehall V. Role of the serrated pathway in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Gastroenterology 2010; 138: 2088-2100
• 6 Estrada RG, Spjut HJ. Hyperplastic polyps of the large bowel. Am J Surg Pathol 1980; 4: 127-133
• 7 Goldman H, Ming S, Hickock DF. Nature and significance of hyperplastic polyps of the human colon. Arch Pathol 1970; 89: 349-354
• 8 Jass JR, Baker K, Zlobec I et al. Advanced colorectal polyps with the molecular and morphological features of serrated polyps and adenomas: concept of a ‘fusion’ pathway to colorectal cancer. Histopathology 2006; 49: 121-131
• 9 Otori K, Oda Y, Sugiyama K et al. High frequency of K-ras mutations in human colorectal hyperplastic polyps. Gut 1997; 40: 660-663
• 10 Tuppurainen K, Makinen JM, Junttila O et al. Morphology and microsatellite instability in sporadic serrated and non-serrated colorectal cancer. J Pathol 2005; 207: 285-294
• 11 Boparai KS, van den Broek FJ, van Eeden S et al. Hyperplastic polyposis syndrome: a pilot study for the differentiation of polyps by using high-resolution endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging, and narrow-band imaging. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 947-955
• 12 Hasegawa S, Mitsuyama K, Kawano H et al. Endoscopic discrimination of sessile serrated adenomas from other serrated lesions. Oncol Lett 2011; 2: 785-789
• 13 Kimura T, Yamamoto E, Yamano HO et al. A novel pit pattern identifies the precursor of colorectal cancer derived from sessile serrated adenoma. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 460-469
• 14 Yano Y, Konishi K, Yamochi T et al. Clinicopathological and molecular features of colorectal serrated neoplasias with different mucosal crypt patterns. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 1351-1358
• 15 [Anonymous] The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 3-43
• 16 Konishi K, Kaneko K, Kurahashi T et al. A comparison of magnifying and nonmagnifying colonoscopy for diagnosis of colorectal polyps: A prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 48-53
• 17 Kudo S, Tamura S, Nakajima T et al. Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 8-14
• 18 Snover D, Ahnen DJ, Burt RW et al. Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum and serrated (“hyperplastic”) polyposis. In: et al. Bozman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, , eds. WHO classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system. 4th. edn. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2010
• 19 Clark SJ, Harrison J, Paul CL et al. High sensitivity mapping of methylated cytosines. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22: 2990-2997
• 20 Konishi K, Shen L, Wang S et al. Rare CpG island methylator phenotype in ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasias. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 1254-1260
• 21 Issa JP. CpG island methylator phenotype in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2004; 4: 988-993
• 22 Shen L, Toyota M, Kondo Y et al. Integrated genetic and epigenetic analysis identifies three different subclasses of colon cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104: 18654-18659
• 23 Buda A, De Bona M, Dotti I et al. Prevalence of different subtypes of serrated polyps and risk of synchronous advanced colorectal neoplasia in average-risk population undergoing first-time colonoscopy. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2012; 3: e6
• 24 Konishi K, Yamochi T, Makino R et al. Molecular differences between sporadic serrated and conventional colorectal adenomas. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 3082-3090
• 25 Rex DK, Ahnen DJ, Baron JA et al. Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 1315-1329 ; quiz 1314, 1330
• 26 Tadepalli US, Feihel D, Miller KM et al. A morphologic analysis of sessile serrated polyps observed during routine colonoscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1360-1368