Endoscopy 2015; 47(01): 80-86
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1390705
Guideline
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Live endoscopy events (LEEs): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Position Statement – Update 2014

Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
,
Cesare Hassan
European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
,
Alexander Meining
European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
,
Lars Aabakken
European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
,
Paul Fockens
European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 18 August 2014

accepted after revision 25 August 2015

Publication Date:
14 October 2014 (online)

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) is dedicated to improving the quality of gastrointestinal endoscopy through educational activities such as live endoscopy events (LEEs). The primary utility of LEEs is the educational value for the audience, and patients should not expect additional benefit from being treated during a LEE compared to a routine setting. Although there is no evidence that LEEs entail additional risks for patients, neither can possible unknown risks be excluded as the evidence available is limited. Therefore, necessary measures should be taken to assure patient safety. Patients must be adequately informed that the standard of care will be assured and that their identity will not be revealed. ESGE recommends that an endoscopist not belonging to the hosting unit is named as patient advocate. Clinical indications for the LEE procedures and the educational outputs must be clear and agreed between host and demonstrator teams. ESGE will ensure that in all ESGE-organized LEEs the indications, procedural descriptions, and adverse events will be registered, and that organizers requesting ESGE endorsement can demonstrate such a registry.

 
  • References

  • 1 Walsh CM, Sherlock ME, Ling SC et al. Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 6: CD008237
  • 2 Parra-Blanco A, Gonzalez N, Gonzalez R et al. Animal models for endoscopic training: do we really need them?. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 478-484
  • 3 Itoi T, Gotoda T, Baron TH et al. Creation of simulated papillae for endoscopic sphincterotomy and papillectomy training by using in vivo and ex vivo pig model (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 793-800
  • 4 Yoshida N, Yagi N, Inada Y et al. Possibility of ex vivo animal training model for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013; 28: 49-56
  • 5 Loren DE, Azar R, Charles RJ et al. Updated guidelines for live endoscopy demonstrations. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 1105-1107
  • 6 Carr-Locke DL, Gostout CJ, Van Dam J. A guideline for live endoscopy courses: an ASGE White Paper. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 685-688
  • 7 Kruse A, Beilenhoff U, Axon AT. ESGE/ESGENA Guideline for live demonstration courses. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 781-84
  • 8 Deviere J, Ponchon T, Beilenhoff U et al. Recommendations of the ESGE workshop on Ethical-Legal Issues Concerning Live Demonstrations in Digestive Endoscopy. First European Symposium on Ethics in Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Kos, Greece, June 2003. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 765-767
  • 9 Dehmer GJ, Douglas Jr JS, Abizaid A et al. SCAI/ACCF/HRS/ESC/SOLACI/APSIC statement on the use of live case demonstrations at cardiology meetings: assessments of the past and standards for the future. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: 1267-1282
  • 10 Dehmer GJ. A Code of Conduct is published for live case demonstrations. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 777-778
  • 11 Artibani W, Ficarra V, Challacombe BJ et al. EAU policy on live surgery events. Eur Urol 2014; 66: 88-97
  • 12 Sade RM. Broadcast of surgical procedures as a teaching instrument in cardiothoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 86: 357-361
  • 13 Schmit A, Lazaraki G, Hittelet A et al. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography during live endoscopy workshop demonstrations. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 695-699
  • 14 Ridtitid W, Rerknimitr R, Treeprasertsuk S et al. Outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography during live endoscopy demonstrations. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 1931-1938
  • 15 Liao Z, Li ZS, Leung JW et al. How safe and successful are live demonstrations of therapeutic ERCP? A large multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 47-52
  • 16 Murphy DG. Let the games begin (with EAU approval). Eur Urol 2014; 66: 98-100
  • 17 Shimizu S, Itaba S, Yada S et al. Significance of telemedicine for video image transmission of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography procedures. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2011; 18: 366-374
  • 18 Rabenstein T, Maiss J, Naegele-Jackson S et al. Tele-endoscopy: influence of data compression, bandwidth and simulated impairments on the usability of real-time digital video endoscopy transmissions for medical diagnoses. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 703-710
  • 19 Lee SP, Lee HL, Hahm JS et al. International live endoscopic multichannel demonstration using superfast broadband internet connections. Clin Endosc 2012; 45: 73-77
  • 20 Huang KJ, Qiu ZJ, Fu CY et al. Uncompressed video image transmission of laparoscopic or endoscopic surgery for telemedicine. Telemed J E Health 2008; 14: 479-485