Anterior meatuscopy is more reliable than a sniff test for predicting nasal patency before transnasal endoscopy

Background and study aims: Unsedated transnasal esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (UT-EGD) has been performed for at least two decades but many techniques related to the procedure have yet to be standardized. We aimed to develope a simple endoscopic method, anterior meatuscopy, to replace the sniff test for selecting the most patent nasal meatus before UT-EGD. We hypothesized that access to the common nasal meatus (CNM), if confirmed by anterior meatuscopy, was a safer route than the inferior (INM) and middle nasal meatuses (MNM) because it would result in reduced epistaxis, nasal pain, and nasal discharge.

Patients and methods: We used anterior meatuscopy and an endoscopic meatus scoring scale (EMSS) to identify the optimal meatus for insertion. We evaluated the EMSS frequency distributions for the INM, CNM, and MNM and the reliability of a sniff test in 1,000 consecutive patients. The adverse effects of passing through the CNM versus the INM and MNM, respectively, were compared.

Results: In the INM and MNM, the EMSS frequencies were grade I > II > III > 0 whereas those in the CNM were grade II > I > 0 > III. A sniff test was not reliable, given its low sensitivity (63.3 %), specificity (67.3 %), positive predictive value (69.1 %), negative predictive value (61.4 %), and accuracy (65.2 %). Although only 9.2 % of our patients had grade III anterior-to-posterior CNMs, passage through this spacious CNM rather than through the MNM or the INM could significantly reduce epistaxis, nasal pain, and nasal discharge.

Conclusions: Anterior meatuscopy is more reliable than a sniff test before UT-EGD. Transnasal endoscopic passage through the endoscopically patent CNM, if detected by anterior meatuscopy, may prevent epistaxis and nasal pain and minimize nasal discharge.

• References

• 1 Choe WH, Kim JH, Ko SY et al. Comparison of transnasal small-caliber vs. peroral conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating varices in unsedated cirrhotic patients. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 649-656
• 2 Sami SS, Dunagan KT, Johnson ML et al. A Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Novel Endoscopic Techniques and Approaches for Barrett's Esophagus Screening in the Community. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 148-158
• 3 Nevah MI, Lamberth JR, Dekovich AA. Transnasal PEG tube placement in patients with head and neck cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 599-604
• 4 Wildi SM, Gubler C, Vavricka SR et al. Transnasal endoscopy for the placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes: does the working length of the endoscope matter?. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 225-229
• 5 Itoi T, Kawai T, Sofuni A et al. Efficacy and safety of 1-step transnasal endoscopic nasobiliary drainage for the treatment of acute cholangitis in patients with previous endoscopic sphincterotomy (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 84-90
• 6 Hu CT. Transnasal pharyngoscopy to assist nasobiliary tube placement: a simple technique to avoid injury to the patient, endoscopist, and endoscope. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 923-924
• 7 Lin J, Chen M, Lei W et al. Eradication of diffuse gastric Peutz-Jeghers polyps by unsedated transnasal snare polypectomy and argon plasma coagulation. Endoscopy 2009; 41: E207-208
• 8 Ai ZL, Lan CH, Fan LL et al. Unsedated transnasal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has favorable diagnostic effectiveness, cardiopulmonary safety, and patient satisfaction compared with conventional or sedated endoscopy. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 3565-3572
• 9 Cohen JT, Safadi A, Fliss DM et al. Reliability of a transnasal flexible fiberoptic in-office laryngeal biopsy. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 139: 341-345
• 10 Sabirin J, Abd Rahman M, Rajan P. Changing trends in oesophageal endoscopy: a systematic review of transnasal oesophagoscopy. ISRN Otolaryngol 2013; 2013: 586973
• 11 Peery AF, Hoppo T, Garman KS et al. Barrett's esophagus risk consortium. Feasibility, safety, acceptability, and yield of office-based, screening transnasal esophagoscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 945-953
• 12 Hoppo T, Jobe BA. Techniques of office-based endoscopy: unsedated transnasal endoscopy. Principles of flexible endoscopy for surgeons. 2013; 201-213
• 13 Tatsumi Y, Harada A, Matsumoto T et al. Current status and evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Dig Endosc 2009; 21: 141-146
• 14 Hu CT. Endoscopic-guided versus cotton-tipped applicator methods of nasal anesthesia for transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized, prospective, controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 1114-1121
• 15 Hu CT. Gauze pledgetting versus endoscopic-guided aerosolized spray for nasal anesthesia before transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a prospective, randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 11-20
• 16 Hu C. Reporting the how, where, and grading of nasomucosal injury after transnasal endoscopy. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 688-689
• 17 Hu CT. Nasal anesthesia and body position changes: lessons learned from self-performed, transnasal EGD. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 1277-1279
• 18 Mori A. Reporting the how, where, and grading of nasomucosal injury after transnasal endoscopy (Letter reply to Hu). Endoscopy 2010; 42: 689
• 19 Dahlstrom K, Olinger A. Anatomic description of the middle meatus and classification of the hiatus semilunaris into five types based upon morphological characteristics. Clin Anat 2014; 27: 176-181
• 20 Proetz AW. Physiology of the nose from the standpoint of the plastic surgeon. Arch Otolaryngol 1944; 39: 514-517
• 21 Lee YS, Bang CS, Suk KT et al. Catheter-free method is sufficient for preparation for transnasal endoscopy: randomized controlled trial. Dig Endosc 2014; 26: 385-391
• 22 Clerico DM. Pneumatized superior turbinate as a cause of referred migraine headache. Laryngoscope 1996; 106: 874-879
• 23 Baraniuk JN, Kim D. Nasonasal reflexes, the nasal cycle, and sneeze. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2007; 7: 105-111