The Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) technique: how many preclinical procedures are needed to master it?

Oscar Víctor Hernández Mondragón; Dulce Maria Rascón Martínez; Aracely Muñoz Bautista; Maria Lourdes Altamirano Castañeda; Gerardo Blanco-Velasco; Juan Manuel Blancas Valencia

doi:10.1055/s-0034-1392807

Endoscopy International Open, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Endosc Int Open 2015; 03(06): E559-E565
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1392807

Original article

The Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) technique: how many preclinical procedures are needed to master it?

Oscar Víctor Hernández Mondragón

¹Department of Endoscopy, Specialties Hospital, National Medical Center Century XXI, Mexico City, Mexico

,

Dulce Maria Rascón Martínez

²Department of Anesthesiology and Biostatistics, Specialties Hospital, National Medical Center Century XXI, Mexico City, Mexico

,

Aracely Muñoz Bautista

³Department of Veterinarian Surgery, Specialties Hospital, National Medical Center Century XXI, Mexico City, Mexico

,

Maria Lourdes Altamirano Castañeda

³Department of Veterinarian Surgery, Specialties Hospital, National Medical Center Century XXI, Mexico City, Mexico

,

Gerardo Blanco-Velasco

¹Department of Endoscopy, Specialties Hospital, National Medical Center Century XXI, Mexico City, Mexico

,

Juan Manuel Blancas Valencia

¹Department of Endoscopy, Specialties Hospital, National Medical Center Century XXI, Mexico City, Mexico

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Background and study aim: Per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a complex technique used in achalasia. Preclinical training is essential but little is known about the number of procedures needed. The aim of this study was to determine the number of procedures required to master POEM in an animal model.

Patients and methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted in two swine models at a single institution in Mexico City between November 2012 and October 2014: Group 1 (G1) = 30 ex vivo and Group 2 (G2) = 20 live swine models. POEM was mastered after finishing the five steps without complications. Time, characteristics, and complications were recorded. Velocity of tunnelization and myotomy (VTM) was determined. Ex vivo analysis was done in G1 immediately after finishing POEM and at day 30 in G2.

Results: A total of 50 POEM were done in both groups (G1 = 30, G2 = 20). The mean times were 90.17 min (G1) and 89.50 min (G2) (P = 0.92). Myotomy was faster in G2 (21.10 vs 27.97 min; P = 0.009) with a slightly slower tunnelization (40.35 vs 41.13 min; P = 0.86). Myotomy was longer in G2 (9.25 vs 8.83 cm; P = 0.26). VTM between the groups was similar (G1 = 0.159 vs G2 = 0.157 cm/min; P = 0.925). Complications were: mucosotomy (G1 = 18 %, G2 = 8 %; P = 0.430), mediastinal perforation (G1 = 12 %, G2 = 8 %; P = 1.0), and perforation at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) level (G1 = 16 %, G2 = 4 %; P = 0.149). Seven models in G2 presented minor bleeding and there was one death not attributed to the procedure. Mastery was obtained after 26 cases.

Conclusions: We suggest that centers interested in learning POEM consider 26 procedures in animal models to master it before performing it in patients with achalasia.

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Cash BD, Wong RK. Historical perspective of achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2001; 11: 221-234
2 Beck WC, Sharp KW. Achalasia. Surg Clin North Am 2011; 91: 1031-1037
3 Gockel HR, Schumacher J, Gockel I et al. Achalasia: will genetic studies provide insights?. Hum Genet 2010; 128: 353-364
4 Fisichella PM, Raz D, Palazzo F et al. Clinical, radiological, and manometric profile in 145 patients with untreated achalasia. World J Surg 2008; 32: 1974-1979
5 Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ et al. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24: 57-65
6 Vaezi MF, Pandolfino JE, Vela MF. ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 1238-1249
7 Stefanidis D, Richardson W, Farrell TM et al. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of esophageal achalasia. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 296-311
8 Allescher HD, Storr M, Seige M et al. Treatment of achalasia: botulinum toxin injection vs pneumatic balloon dilation. A prospective study with long-term follow-up. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 1007-1017
9 Boeckxstaens GE, Annese V, des Varannes SB et al. Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy for idiopathic achalasia. NEJM 2011; 364: 1807-1816
10 Patti MG, Feo CV, Arcerito M et al. Effects of previously treatment on results of laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia. Dig Dis Sci 1999; 11: 2270-2276
11 Pasricha PJ, Hawari R, Ahmed I et al. Submucosal endoscopic esophageal myotomy: a novel experimental approach for the treatment of achalasia. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 761-764
12 Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 265-271
13 Teitelbaum EN, Rajeswaran S, Zhang R et al. Peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy produce a similar short-term anatomic and functional effect. Surgery 2013; 154: 885-891
14 Stavropoulos SN, Desilets D, Fuchs K et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy white paper summary. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 1-15
15 Von Renteln D, Inoue H, Minami H et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: A prospective single center study. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 411-417
16 Costamagna G, Marchese M, Familiari P et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia: preliminary results in humans. Dig Liver Dis 2012; 44: 827-832
17 Ren Z, Zhong Y, Zhou P et al. Perioperative management and treatment for complications during and after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia (EA) (Data from 119 cases). Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 3267-3272
18 Teitelbaum EN, Soper NJ, Arafat FO et al. Analysis of learning curve and predictors of intraoperative difficulty for peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM). J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18: 92-98
19 Kurian A, Dunst C, Sharata A et al. Peroral endoscopic esophageal myotomy: defining the learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 719-725
20 Patel KS, Calixte R, Modayil RJ et al. The light at the end of the tunnel: a single-operator learning curve analysis for per oral endoscopic myotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;
21 Kumta N, Mehta S, Kedia P et al. Per oral endoscopic myotomy: establishing a new program. Clin Endosc 2014; 47: 389-397
22 Desilets DJ, Romanelli JR, Earle DB. Starting a peroral endoscopic myotomy program at your institution. Tech Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 15: 157-159
23 Khashab MA. Thoughts on starting a peroral endoscopic myotomy program. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 109-110
24 Eleftheriadis N, Inoue H, Ikeda H et al. Training in peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2012; 8: 329-342
25 Triantafyllou K, Lazaridis LD, Dimitriadis GD. Virtual reality simulators for gastrointestinal endoscopy training. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6: 6-12
26 Stravopoulos SN, Modayil RJ, Friedel D et al. The International Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy Survey (IPOEMS): a snapshot of the global POEM; experience. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 3322-3338
27 Oda I, Odagaki T, Suzuki H et al. Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer based on trainee experience. Dig Endosc 2012; 24: 129-132
28 Bloomston M, Serafini F, Boyce HW et al. The “learning curve” in videoscopic Heller myotomy. JSLS 2002; 6: 41-47