Which part of a porcine stomach is suitable as an animal training model for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection?

Joichiro Horii; Osamu Goto; Masayuki Shimoda; Motoki Sasaki; Ai Fujimoto; Yasutoshi Ochiai; Naohisa Yahagi

doi:10.1055/s-0034-1393047

Endoscopy, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Endoscopy 2016; 48(02): 188-193
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1393047

Innovations and brief communications

Which part of a porcine stomach is suitable as an animal training model for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection?

Joichiro Horii

¹Department of Gastroenterology, Fukuyama Medical Center, Fukuyama, Japan

²Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan

,

Osamu Goto

²Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan

,

Masayuki Shimoda

³Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan

,

Motoki Sasaki

²Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan

,

Ai Fujimoto

²Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan

,

Yasutoshi Ochiai

²Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan

,

Naohisa Yahagi

²Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Background and study aims: Training using an animal model is generally recommended before performing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in humans. This study aimed to clarify the suitability of an isolated porcine stomach as an animal training model for gastric ESD.

Materials and methods: Study 1: six experienced endoscopists performed ESDs of six simulated lesions located in six locations in an isolated porcine stomach (1, lower third [L]/ greater curvature [Gre]; 2, L/ anterior wall [Ant]; 3, L/ posterior wall [Post]; 4, upper third [U]/ Gre; 5, U/Ant; 6, U/Post). The procedure times (s/cm²) were compared among the different lesion locations. A questionnaire (scored 1 – 5) completed by the endoscopists was used to assess the difference in the difficulty compared to the human stomach of the three steps of the ESD procedure (injection, incision and dissection). Study 2: the thicknesses of the mucosal layers were histologically evaluated among the six locations in three porcine and two human stomachs.

Results: Study 1: the procedure speed was significantly slower at L/Gre and U/Gre in the porcine stomachs (P = 0.0004). The questionnaire responses revealed a tendency toward similarity between the lower regions of the human and porcine stomachs at L/Ant, L/Post, U/Ant and U/Post during the dissection step (P = 0.056). In contrast, the injection and incision steps at L/Gre in the porcine stomach were shown to differ in difficultly level (both P = 0.0006). Study 2: the mucosal layers in the porcine stomachs were significantly thicker than those in the human stomachs in the lower areas, especially L/Gre.

Conclusions: The difficulty of ESD and the histological features of the porcine stomachs were coincident with those of the human stomachs at L/Ant, L/Post, U/Ant and U/Post. These parts of the porcine stomach may be suitable as animal training models for gastric ESD.

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Yahagi N, Fujishiro M, Kakushima N et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for lesions of the esophago-gastric junction and gastric cardia. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2004; 59: Ab171-Ab171
2 Kodashima S, Fujishiro M, Yahagi N et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection using flexknife. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 40: 378-384
3 Goto O, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S et al. Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer with special reference to validation for curability criteria. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 118-122
4 Oka S, Tanaka S, Kaneko I et al. Advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 877-883
5 Gotoda T, Friedland S, Hamanaka H et al. A learning curve for advanced endoscopic resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 866-867
6 Tsuji Y, Ohata K, Sekiguchi M et al. An effective training system for endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric neoplasm. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 1033-1038
7 Yamamoto S, Uedo N, Ishihara R et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer performed by supervised residents: assessment of feasibility and learning curve. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 923-928
8 Goda K, Fujishiro M, Hirasawa K et al. How to teach and learn endoscopic submucosal dissection for upper gastrointestinal neoplasm in Japan. Dig Endosc 2012; 24 (Suppl. 01) 136-142
9 Uraoka T, Parra-Blanco A, Yahagi N. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in Japan and Western countries. Dig Endosc 2012; 24 (Suppl. 01) 80-83
10 Parra-Blanco A, Arnau MR, Nicolas-Perez D et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection training with pig models in a Western country. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 2895-2900
11 Tanaka S, Morita Y, Fujita T et al. Ex vivo pig training model for esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for endoscopists with experience in gastric ESD. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 1579-1586
12 Imagawa A, Okada H, Kawahara Y et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: results and degrees of technical difficulty as well as success. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 987-990
13 Wang TE, Wang HY, Lin CC et al. Simulating a target lesion for endoscopic submucosal dissection training in an ex vivo pig model. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 398-402