Download PDF
Flugmedizin · Tropenmedizin · Reisemedizin - FTR 2014; 21(06): 278
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1397300
Journal-Club
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Neuer Anti-G-Anzug für Flugbesatzungen getestet – Kein ausreichender Schutz vor Fliehkräften durch elektrische Muskelstimulation

Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 January 2015 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Balldin UI, Gibbons JA. Inferior G protection with an electrical muscle stimulation suit compared to a standard G-suit. Aviat Space Environ Med 2014; 85: 1071–1077

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Sevilla NL, Gardener JW. G-induced loss of consciousness: case-control study of 78 G-LOCs in the F-15, F-16, and A-10. Aviat Space Environ Med 2005; 76: 370-374
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Green NDC, Ford SA. G-induced loss of consciousness: retrospective survey results from 2259 military aircrew. Aviat Space Environ Med 2006; 77: 619-623
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Lyons TJ, Kraft NO, Copley GB et al. Analysis of mission and aircraft factors in G-induced loss of consciousness in the USAF: 1982–2002. Aviat Space Environ Med 2004; 75: 479-482
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Balldin UI, Annicelli L, Gibbons J, Kisner J. An electrical muscle stimulation suit for increasing blood pressure. Aviat Space Environ Med 2008; 79: 914-918
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar