Download PDF
Zentralbl Chir 2015; 140(03): 266-272
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1545963
Übersicht
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Genderaspekte bei Tumoren des Gastrointestinaltrakts und ihre Prognose, insbesondere im Rahmen multimodaler Therapiekonzepte

Gender Aspects in Gastrointestinal Tumours and Their Prognosis in Regard to Multimodal Treatment Concepts
U. Seeland
1   Institut für Geschlechterforschung in der Medizin (GiM), Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Deutschland
,
U. Heger
2   Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Chirurgische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Deutschland
,
K. Heise
3   Klinik für Allgemein-, Visceral, Gefäß- und Thoraxchirurgie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Deutschland
,
K. Ott
4   Klinik für Allgemein-, Gefäß- und Thoraxchirurgie, RoMed Klinikum Rosenheim, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 June 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Für den Gastrointestinaltrakt wurden bisher keine systematischen Untersuchungen zum Einfluss des Geschlechts auf den Verlauf von malignen Erkrankungen publiziert, u. a., weil „Geschlecht“ in den bedeutenden Studien zum Thema meist kein Stratifikationskriterium war. Es ist jedoch unumstritten, dass sich die gastrointestinalen Tumoren in Risikofaktoren, Inzidenz und Prognose geschlechtsspezifisch unterscheiden. Diese Übersichtsarbeit fasst die wichtigsten Kenntnisse zu den biologischen („sex“) und soziokulturellen („gender“) Geschlechterunterschieden zusammen und betrachtet anatomische Unterschiede mit direkter Konsequenz für die chirurgische Intervention. Im oberen Gastrointestinaltrakt existieren die bedeutendsten epidemiologischen Unterschiede hinsichtlich der histologischen Subtypen mit direkten Konsequenzen für Diagnostik, Therapie und Prognose. Bei vielen Tumorentitäten haben Frauen eine bessere Prognose. Beim kolorektalen Karzinom scheinen Sexualhormone, insbesondere Östrogene, eine bedeutende Rolle in der Tumorentstehung zu spielen. Die histopathologische Bestimmung der Expression des Östrogenrezeptors beta (ERβ) im Tumorgewebe von Patienten mit Kolonkarzinom hat Bedeutung erlangt, seitdem Studien gezeigt haben, dass die Prognose bei Frauen mit niedriger ERβ-Expression günstiger zu beurteilen ist als bei Männern mit vergleichbarem Rezeptorstatus. Die Kenntnis über eine häufigere rechtsseitige Lokalisation von Kolonkarzinomen und nicht polypoiden Neoplasien bei Frauen könnte zu verbesserten Präventionsmaßnahmen führen. Männer und Frauen nehmen die empfohlenen Vorsorgekoloskopien aus unterschiedlichen Gründen nicht wahr, hier könnte mit geschlechterspezifischen Ansätzen die Darmkrebsvorsorge verbessert werden. Um Nebenwirkungen bei der adjuvanten Chemotherapie zu vermeiden, sind Daten zur unterschiedlichen Bioverfügbarkeit z. B. von 5-FU (5-Fluoruracil) bei Frauen und Männern nützlich und sollten bei der Dosierung beachtet werden. Die weiterführende systematische Aufarbeitung des Geschlechteraspekts bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren wäre wünschenswert und ein bedeutender Schritt in Richtung personalisierte onkologische Chirurgie.

Abstract

Systematic analyses of gender effects in gastrointestinal malignancies are currently lacking, partly because sex and gender have not been used as stratification criteria in major studies on the topic. It is, however, indisputable that gastrointestinal tumours differ in risk factors, incidence and prognosis between the genders. This review summarises the most important findings on differences related to biological sex and sociocultural gender and discusses anatomic specifics with immediate significance for surgical interventions. Epidemiological differences in upper gastrointestinal malignancies are most prominent in regard to histological subtypes, directly affecting diagnostics, therapy, and prognosis. Women have a better prognosis in many of these tumour subtypes. For colorectal carcinoma, sex hormones, specifically oestrogens, appear to play a distinct role in tumourigenesis. Histopathological analysis of the expression of oestrogen receptor beta (ERβ) in the tumour tissue has attracted interest since it was shown that women with low ERβ expression have a better prognosis than men with comparable ERβ status. Data on the higher incidence of right-sided colon carcinoma and non-polypoid neoplasms in women could lead to improved screening programmes. Men and women cite differing reasons for avoidance of screening colonoscopies, thus gender specific approaches could improve colon cancer prevention programmes. Data on differing bioavailability of 5-fluorouracil between the genders are useful to minimise adverse effects of chemotherapy and should be accounted for in dosage. Further systematic analysis of gender effects on gastrointestinal tumours is warranted and would be a substantial step towards personalised oncological surgery.

Schlüsselwörter

Abdominalchirurgie - Gastrointestinaltumor - kolorektales Karzinom - Magenkarzinom - Pankreaschirurgie

Key words

gastrointestinal surgery - gastrointestinal tumour - colorectal carcinoma - gastric carcinoma - pancreatic surgery
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Wardle J, Miles A, Atkin W. Gender differences in utilization of colorectal cancer screening. J Med Screen 2005; 12: 20-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 11-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM et al. Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12: 681-692
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1731-1740
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Gill S, Loprinzi CL, Sargent DJ et al. Pooled analysis of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer: who benefits and by how much?. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 1797-1806
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ayanian JZ, Epstein AM. Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 221-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Rutegard M, Shore R, Lu Y et al. Sex differences in the incidence of gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma in Sweden 1970–2006. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 1093-1100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Freedman ND, Derakhshan MH, Abnet CC et al. Male predominance of upper gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma cannot be explained by differences in tobacco smoking in men versus women. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 2473-2478
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Derakhshan MH, McColl KE. Gender, hiatus hernia and Barrettʼs oesophagus. Gut 2009; 58: 1025
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Micheli A, Ciampichini R, Oberaigner W et al. The advantage of women in cancer survival: an analysis of EUROCARE-4 data. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45: 1017-1027
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Micheli A, Mariotto A, Giorgi Rossi A et al. The prognostic role of gender in survival of adult cancer patients. EUROCARE Working Group. Eur J Cancer 1998; 34: 2271-2278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Yang D, Hendifar A, Lenz C et al. Survival of metastatic gastric cancer: Significance of age, sex and race/ethnicity. J Gastrointest Oncol 2011; 2: 77-84
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Morita M, Otsu H, Kawano H et al. Gender differences in prognosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Today 2014; 44: 505-512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Rutegard M, Nordenstedt H, Lu Y et al. Sex-specific exposure prevalence of established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Br J Cancer 2010; 103: 735-740
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Rashid F, Khan RN, Iftikhar SY. Probing the link between oestrogen receptors and oesophageal cancer. World J Surg Oncol 2010; 8: 9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Liu CY, Wu MC, Chen F et al. A Large-scale genetic association study of esophageal adenocarcinoma risk. Carcinogenesis 2010; 31: 1259-1263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Zhang J, Zhan Z, Wu J et al. Association among polymorphisms in EGFR gene exons, lifestyle and risk of gastric cancer with gender differences in Chinese Han subjects. PLoS One 2013; 8: e59254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Song HR, Shin MH, Kim HN et al. Sex-specific differences in the association between ABO genotype and gastric cancer risk in a Korean population. Gastric Cancer 2013; 16: 254-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Majek O, Gondos A, Jansen L et al. Sex differences in colorectal cancer survival: population-based analysis of 164,996 colorectal cancer patients in Germany. PLoS One 2013; 8: e68077
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Abotchie PN, Vernon SW, Du XL. Gender differences in colorectal cancer incidence in the United States, 1975–2006. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2012; 21: 393-400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 zur Hausen H. Red meat consumption and cancer: reasons to suspect involvement of bovine infectious factors in colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 2012; 130: 2475-2483
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Rohatgi PR, Correa AM, Swisher SG et al. Gender-based analysis of esophageal cancer patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiation: differences in presentation and therapy outcome. Dis Esophagus 2006; 19: 152-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Rickert A et al. Risk of colorectal cancer after detection and removal of adenomas at colonoscopy: population-based case-control study. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 2969-2976
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Womenʼs Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288: 321-333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Press OA, Zhang W, Gordon MA et al. Gender-related survival differences associated with polymorphic variants of estrogen receptor-beta (ERbeta) in patients with metastatic colon cancer. Pharmacogenomics J 2011; 11: 375-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Martineti V, Picariello L, Tognarini I et al. ERbeta is a potent inhibitor of cell proliferation in the HCT8 human colon cancer cell line through regulation of cell cycle components. Endocr Relat Cancer 2005; 12: 455-469
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Rath-Wolfson L, Purim O, Ram E et al. Expression of estrogen receptor beta1 in colorectal cancer: correlation with clinicopathological variables. Oncol Rep 2012; 27: 2017-2022
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Grundmann RT, Meyer F. [Gender-specific influences on incidence, screening, treatment, and outcome of colorectal cancer]. Zentralbl Chir 2013; 138: 434-441
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Friedemann-Sanchez G, Griffin JM, Partin MR. Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening barriers and information needs. Health Expect 2007; 10: 148-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Singh H, Nugent Z, Demers AA et al. Rate and predictors of early/missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy in Manitoba: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 2588-2596
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Rondagh EJ, Masclee AA, van der Valk ME et al. Nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms: gender differences in prevalence and malignant potential. Scand J Gastroenterol 2012; 47: 80-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Hendifar A, Yang D, Lenz F et al. Gender disparities in metastatic colorectal cancer survival. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15: 6391-6397
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Pausch T, Hartwig W, Hinz U et al. Cachexia but not obesity worsens the postoperative outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy in pancreatic cancer. Surgery 2012; 152: S81-S88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Lee SS, Ryu SW, Kim IH et al. Impact of gender and body mass index on surgical outcomes following gastrectomy: an Asia-Pacific perspective. Chin Med J (Engl) 2012; 125: 67-71
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Verschueren RC, Mulder NH, Van Loon AJ et al. The anatomical substrate for a difference in surgical approach to rectal cancer in male and female patients. Anticancer Res 1997; 17: 637-641
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Allen SD, Gada V, Blunt DM. Variation of mesorectal volume with abdominal fat volume in patients with rectal carcinoma: assessment with MRI. Br J Radiol 2007; 80: 242-247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Feussner H, Hartl F. [Staging laparoscopy in oncology]. Chirurg 2006; 77: 971-980
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Baiocchi GL, Portolani N, Vermi W et al. Lynch syndrome from a surgeon perspective: retrospective study of clinical impact of mismatch repair protein expression analysis in colorectal cancer patients less than 50 years old. BMC Surg 2014; 14: 9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Elezkurtaj S, Moser L, Budczies J et al. Histopathological regression grading matches excellently with local and regional spread after neoadjuvant therapy of rectal cancer. Pathol Res Pract 2013; 209: 424-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Schmidt T, Sicic L, Blank S et al. Prognostic value of histopathological regression in 850 neoadjuvantly treated oesophagogastric adenocarcinomas. Br J Cancer 2014; 110: 1712-1720
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Ott K, Blank S, Becker K et al. Factors predicting prognosis and recurrence in patients with esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma and histopathological response with less than 10 % residual tumor. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2013; 398: 239-249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Dorak MT, Karpuzoglu E. Gender differences in cancer susceptibility: an inadequately addressed issue. Front Genet 2012; 3: 268
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Ott K, Herrmann K, Schuster T et al. Molecular imaging of proliferation and glucose utilization: utility for monitoring response and prognosis after neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 3316-3323
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Napieralski R, Ott K, Kremer M et al. Methylation of tumor-related genes in neoadjuvant-treated gastric cancer: relation to therapy response and clinicopathologic and molecular features. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13: 5095-5102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Sato H, Maeda K, Sugihara K et al. High-risk stage II colon cancer after curative resection. J Surg Oncol 2011; 104: 45-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Morris M, Platell C, McCaul K et al. Survival rates for stage II colon cancer patients treated with or without chemotherapy in a population-based setting. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007; 22: 887-895
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Ogino S, Shima K, Meyerhardt JA et al. Predictive and prognostic roles of BRAF mutation in stage III colon cancer: results from intergroup trial CALGB 89803. Clin Cancer Res 2012; 18: 890-900
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Guastadisegni C, Colafranceschi M, Ottini L et al. Microsatellite instability as a marker of prognosis and response to therapy: a meta-analysis of colorectal cancer survival data. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 2788-2798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Karner-Hanusch J, Marian B. [Aspects of gender in colorectal tumors]. Wien Med Wochenschr 2006; 156: 541-544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Wichmann MW, Muller C, Hornung HM et al. Gender differences in long-term survival of patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1092-1098
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Seal BS, Sullivan SD, Ramsey SD et al. Systemic Therapy for Colorectal Cancer: Patterns of Chemotherapy and Biologic Therapy Use in Nationally Representative US Claims Database. BioDrugs 2014; 28: 229-236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Salonga D, Danenberg KD, Johnson M et al. Colorectal tumors responding to 5-fluorouracil have low gene expression levels of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, thymidylate synthase, and thymidine phosphorylase. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6: 1322-1327
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Yamashita K, Mikami Y, Ikeda M et al. Gender differences in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expression of colorectal cancers. Cancer Lett 2002; 188: 231-236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Paulson EC, Wirtalla C, Armstrong K et al. Gender influences treatment and survival in colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52: 1982-1991
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Martling A, Granath F, Cedermark B et al. Gender differences in the treatment of rectal cancer: a population based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35: 427-433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar