Open Access
AJP Rep 2015; 05(02): e124-e128
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1549300
Case Report
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Minimally Conjoined Omphalopagus Twins with a Body Stalk Anomaly

Authors

  • Hidehiko Maruyama

    1   Department of Pediatrics, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi, Japan
  • Takeshi Inagaki

    2   Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi, Japan
  • Yusei Nakata

    1   Department of Pediatrics, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi, Japan
  • Akane Kanazawa

    1   Department of Pediatrics, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi, Japan
  • Yuka Iwasaki

    1   Department of Pediatrics, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi, Japan
  • Kiyoshi Sasaki

    3   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi, Japan
  • Ryuhei Nagai

    4   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi, Japan
  • Hiromi Kinoshita

    4   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi, Japan
  • Jun Iwata

    2   Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi, Japan
  • Kiyoshi Kikkawa

    1   Department of Pediatrics, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi, Japan
Further Information

Publication History

03 February 2015

05 March 2015

Publication Date:
08 May 2015 (online)

Abstract

Introduction This report will discuss a case of minimally conjoined omphalopagus twins (MCOTs) with a body stalk anomaly (BSA).

Case Report We experienced monochorionic diamniotic (MD) twins born at 31 weeks. One infant was suspicious of BSA before birth, and another infant was normal. But normal infant had anal atresia with small intestine which was inserted behind the umbilicus. Twins had very short common umbilicus and infant with BSA had intestinal conjunction, two appendixes at the site of the colon, and a blind-ending colon. We diagnosed MCOTs.

Discussion On the basis of the Spencer hypothesis, the etiology of MCOTs was that MD twins shared a yolk sac. However, this could not explain the presence of a BSA. It is necessary to consider the possible reasons for a singleton BSA. In addition, intestinal fusion occurred unequally in this case, although two appendixes were found in the same place, which might have occurred because of the balanced fusion.