Correlation of CBD/CHD angulation with recurrent cholangitis in patients treated with ERCP

Background and study aims: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for bile duct stone extraction has a major role in the treatment of cholangitis. It is well known that certain risk factors predispose to recurrence of such stones. The aims of this study were to evaluate the correlation between angulation of the common bile duct (CBD), right hepatic duct (RHD), and left hepatic duct (LHD) with recurrent cholangitic attacks and to elucidate other risk factors that may be associated with these attacks.

Patients and Methods: This is retrospective study included 62 patients who had undergone therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for bile duct stones. Their medical records were followed until May 1, 2009. The RHD, LHD, and CBD angulation and CBD diameter were measured on cholangiography prior to any endoscopic procedures.

Results: Among these 62 patients, 6 (9.7 %) had recurrence of cholangitis. Both angles of the RHD and the CBD were significantly smaller in the group with recurrence (P = 0.001, P = 0.004). A CBD angle ≤ 130^o and RHD angle ≤ 125^o were found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of recurrence (RR = 10.526, P = 0.033; RR = 24.97, P = 0.008) in multivariate analysis. Cholecystectomy was not a protective factor against recurrence of cholangitis (P = 0.615).

Conclusions: Angulation of the CBD (≤ 130°) and RHD (≤ 125°) on ERCP are independent risk factors for recurrent cholangitis. Further prospective studies using these data may be warranted for a more accurate estimation and verification of the risk factors predisposing to recurrent cholangitis.

• References

• 1 Keizman D, Shalom MI, Konikoff FM. An angulated common bile duct predisposes to recurrent symptomatic bile duct stones after endoscopic stone extraction. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 1594-1599
• 2 Jacobsen O, Matzen P. Long term follow up study of patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. Scan J Gastroenterol 1987; 22: 903-906
• 3 Kullman E, Borch K, Liedberg G. Long term follow up after endoscopic management of retained and recurrent common duct stones. Acta Chir Scand 1989; 155: 395-399
• 4 Geenen DJ, Geenen FM, Jafri FM et al. The role of surveillance endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in preventing episodic cholangitis in patients with recurrent common bile duct stones. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 18-20
• 5 Sato T, Suzuki N, Takahashi W. Follow up studies of surgical treatment of choledocholithiasis. Toboku J Exp Med 1981; 135: 1-9
• 6 Pereira Lima JC, Jakobs R, Winter UH et al. Long term results (7 to 10 years) of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for the recurrence of biliary symptoms. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 457-464
• 7 Costamagna G, Tringali A, Shah SK et al. Long term follow up of patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis, and risk factors for recurrence. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 273-279
• 8 Satio M, Tsuyuguchi T, Yamaguchi T et al. Long term outcome of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis with cholecystolithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 540-545.9
• 9 Ueno N, Ozawa Y, Aizawa T. Prognostic factors for recurrence of bile duct stones after endoscopic treatment by sphincter dilation. Gatrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 336-340
• 10 Warren BL. Association between cholangiographic angulation of the common bile duct and choledocholithiasis. S Afr J Surg 1987; 25: 13-5
• 11 Jeng KS, Ohta I, Yang FS et al. Coexisting sharp ductal angulation with intrahepatic biliary strictures in right hepatolithiasis. Arch Surg 1994; 129: 1097-1102
• 12 Lee KF, Chong CN, Ng D et al. Outcome of surgical treatment for recurrent pyogenic cholangitis: a single-centre study. HPB (Oxford). PubMed PMID 19590627; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2697866 02/2009; 11: 75-80 ( )
• 13 Bergman JJGHM, van der Mey S, Rauws EAJ et al. Long term follow up after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients younger than 60 years of age. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44; 643-649
• 14 Lai KH, Lin LF, Lo GH et al. Does cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy prevent the recurrence of biliary complications?. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 483-487
• 15 Ando T, Tsuyuguchi T, Okugawa T et al. Risk factor for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillotomy. Gut 2003; 52: 116-121
• 16 Kim MH, Myung SJ, Seo DW et al. Association of periampullary diverticula with primary choledocholithiasis but not with secondary choledocholithiasis. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 601-604
• 17 Chandy G, Hart WJ, Roberts-Thomson IC. An analysis of the relationship between bile duct stones and periampullary duodenal diverticula. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1997; 12: 29-33
• 18 Hall RI, Ingoldby CJ, Denyer ME. Periampullary diverticula predispose to primary rather than secondary stones in the common bile duct. Endoscopy 1990; 22: 127-128
• 19 Kennedy RH, Thompson MH. Are duodenal diverticula associated with choledocholithiasis?. Gut 1988; 29: 1003-1006
• 20 Hammatstrom LE, Stridbeck H, Ihse I. Long term follow up after endoscopic treatment of bile duct calculi in cholecystectomized patients. World J. Surg 1996; 20: 272-276