Verb Argument Structure in Narrative Speech: Mining AphasiaBank

Abstract

Previous research has found that verb argument structure characteristics (such as the number of participant roles in the situation described by the verb) can facilitate or hinder aphasic language production and comprehension in constrained laboratory tasks. This research needs to be complemented by studies of narrative or unrestricted speech, which can capture the spontaneous selection of verbs and grammatical structures by people with aphasia and may be particularly sensitive to the relative cost of access to different verb types in more natural conditions. Focusing on the number of subcategorization options, we investigated verb argument structure effects in a large sample of narratives from AphasiaBank, by speakers with aphasia, as well as control speakers without brain damage. Verb argument structure complexity did not negatively affect verb selection in any type of aphasia. However, people with aphasia, particularly with Broca's aphasia, used verbs in less complex and diverse ways, with fewer arguments and less diverse subcategorization options. In line with previous research, this suggests that deficits in verb use in aphasia are likely due to difficulties with the online application of or partial damage to verb argument structure knowledge.

Keywords

Verb argument structure - aphasia - subcategorization options - spontaneous speech in aphasia - verb processing in aphasia

• References

• 1 Berndt RS, Burton MW, Haendiges AN, Mitchum CC. Production of nouns and verbs in aphasia: effects of elicitation context. Aphasiology 2002; 16 (1) 83-106
• 2 Mätzig S, Druks J, Masterson J, Vigliocco G. Noun and verb differences in picture naming: past studies and new evidence. Cortex 2009; 45 (6) 738-758
• 3 Marshall J, Pring T, Chiat S. Verb retrieval and sentence production in aphasia. Brain Lang 1998; 63 (2) 159-183
• 4 Collina S, Marangolo P, Tabossi P. The role of argument structure in the production of nouns and verbs. Neuropsychologia 2001; 39 (11) 1125-1137
• 5 Kim M, Thompson CK. Patterns of comprehension and production of nouns and verbs in agrammatism: implications for lexical organization. Brain Lang 2000; 74 (1) 1-25
• 6 Thompson CK, Dickey MW, Lee J, Cho S, Griffin ZM. Verb argument structure encoding during sentence production in agrammatic aphasic speakers: an eye-tracking study. Brain Lang 2007; 103: 24-26
• 7 Mack JE, Ji W, Thompson CK. Effects of verb meaning on lexical integration in agrammatic aphasia: evidence from eyetracking. J Neurolinguist 2013; 26 (6) 619-636
• 8 Dell GS, Schwartz MF, Martin N, Saffran EM, Gagnon DA. Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychol Rev 1997; 104 (4) 801-838
• 9 Bastiaanse R, Jonkers R. Verb retrieval in action naming and spontaneous speech in agrammatic and anomic aphasia. Aphasiology 1998; 12 (11) 951-969
• 10 Edwards S, Bastiaanse R. Diversity in the lexical and syntactic abilities of fluent aphasic speakers. Aphasiology 1998; 12: 99-117
• 11 Rossi E, Bastiaanse R. Spontaneous speech in Italian agrammatic aphasia: a focus on verb production. Aphasiology 2008; 22 (4) 347-362
• 12 Thompson CK, Shapiro LP, Li L, Schendel L. Analysis of verbs and verb-argument structure: a method for quantification of aphasic language production. Clin Aphasiology 1995; 23: 121-140
• 13 den Ouden DB, Fix S, Parrish TB, Thompson CK. Argument structure effects in action verb naming in static and dynamic conditions. J Neurolinguist 2009; 22 (2) 196-215
• 14 Meltzer-Asscher A, Schuchard J, den Ouden DB, Thompson CK. The neural substrates of complex argument structure representations: processing ‘alternating transitivity’ verbs. Lang Cogn Process 2013; 28 (8) 1154-1168
• 15 Thompson CK, Bonakdarpour B, Fix SC , et al. Neural correlates of verb argument structure processing. J Cogn Neurosci 2007; 19 (11) 1753-1767
• 16 Fodor JA, Garrett M, Bever TG. Some syntactic determinants of sentential complexity, II: verb structure. Percept Psychophys 1968; 3 (6) 453-461
• 17 Holmes VM, Forster KI. Detection of extraneous signals during sentence recognition. Atten Percept Psychophys 1970; 7 (5) 297-301
• 18 Rodríguez-Ferreiro J, Andreu L, Sanz-Torrent M. Argument structure and the representation of abstract semantics. PLoS ONE 2014; 9 (8) e104645
• 19 Shapiro LP, Zurif E, Grimshaw J. Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs. Cognition 1987; 27 (3) 219-246
• 20 Shetreet E, Friedmann N, Hadar U. Cortical representation of verbs with optional complements: the theoretical contribution of fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 2010; 31 (5) 770-785
• 21 Shetreet E, Palti D, Friedmann N, Hadar U. Cortical representation of verb processing in sentence comprehension: number of complements, subcategorization, and thematic frames. Cereb Cortex 2007; 17 (8) 1958-1969
• 22 Shapiro LP, Levine BA. Verb processing during sentence comprehension in aphasia. Brain Lang 1990; 38 (1) 21-47
• 23 Macwhinney B, Fromm D, Forbes M, Holland A. AphasiaBank: methods for studying discourse. Aphasiology 2011; 25 (11) 1286-1307
• 24 MacWhinney B. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000
• 25 Baayen R, Piepenbrock R, Gulikers L. CELEX2 LDC96L14. Web Download. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium; 1995
• 26 Coltheart M. The MRC Psycholinguistic Database. Q J Exp Psychol 1981; 33A: 497-505
• 27 Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–7. 2014. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4 Accessed 01/30/2016
• 28 R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: 2014. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/ . Accessed January 30, 2016
• 29 Shannon CE, Weaver W. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 1948; 27: 379-423
• 30 Nickels LA. Getting it right? Using aphasic naming errors to evaluate theoretical models of spoken word production. Lang Cogn Process 1995; 10 (1) 13-45
• 31 Kittredge AK, Dell GS, Verkuilen J, Schwartz MF. Where is the effect of frequency in word production? Insights from aphasic picture-naming errors. Cogn Neuropsychol 2008; 25 (4) 463-492
• 32 Thompson CK, Riley EA, den Ouden DB, Meltzer-Asscher A, Lukic S. Training verb argument structure production in agrammatic aphasia: behavioral and neural recovery patterns. Cortex 2013; 49 (9) 2358-2376
• 33 Thompson CK. Unaccusative verb production in agrammatic aphasia: the argument structure complexity hypothesis. J Neurolinguist 2003; 16 (2–3) 151-167
• 34 Levin B, Rappaport-Hovav M. Unaccusativity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1995
• 35 Gordon JK, Dell GS. Learning to divide the labor: an account of deficits in light and heavy verb production. Cogn Sci 2003; 27 (1) 1-40
• 36 Kok P, van Doorn A, Kolk H. Inflection and computational load in agrammatic speech. Brain Lang 2007; 102 (3) 273-283
• 37 Faroqi-Shah Y, Graham LE. Treatment of semantic verb classes in aphasia: acquisition and generalization effects. Clin Linguist Phon 2011; 25 (5) 399-418
• 38 Conroy P, Sage KE, Lambon Ralph MA. A comparison of word versus sentence cues as therapy for verb naming in aphasia. Aphasiology 2009; 23 (4) 462-482
• 39 Wambaugh J, Cameron R, Kalinyak-Fliszar M, Nessler C, Wright S. Retrieval of action names in aphasia: effects of two cueing treatments. Aphasiology 2003; 18 (11) 979-1004
• 40 Edmonds LA, Mammino K, Ojeda J. Effect of Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST) in persons with aphasia: extension and replication of previous findings. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2014; 23 (2) S312-S329
• 41 Bazzini A, Zonca G, Craca A , et al. Rehabilitation of argument structure deficits in aphasia. Aphasiology 2012; 26 (12) 1440-1460