CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 21(02): 144-150
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1583526
Original Research
Thieme-Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Psychoacoustic Characteristics of Tinnitus versus Temporal Resolution in Subjects with Normal Hearing Sensitivity

Ola Abdallah Ibraheem
1   Audiology Unit, Department of Otolaryngology, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
Mohammad Ramadan Hassaan
1   Audiology Unit, Department of Otolaryngology, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

06 January 2016

25 March 2016

Publication Date:
05 May 2016 (online)


Introduction Cochlear or neural mechanisms of tinnitus generation may affect auditory temporal resolution in tinnitus patients even with normal audiometry. Thus, studying the correlation between tinnitus characteristics and auditory temporal resolution in subjects with tinnitus may help in proper modification of tinnitus management strategy.

Objective This study aims to examine the relationship between the psychoacoustic measures of tinnitus and the auditory temporal resolution in subjects with normal audiometry.

Methods Two normal hearing groups with ages ranging from 20 to 45 years were involved: control group of 15 adults (30 ears) without tinnitus and study group of 15 adults (24 ears) with tinnitus. Subjective scaling of annoyance and sleep disturbance caused by tinnitus, basic audiological evaluation, tinnitus psychoacoustic measures and Gaps in Noise test were performed. Data from both groups were compared using independent sample t-test. Psychoacoustic measures of tinnitus and Gaps in Noise test parameters of the tinnitus group were correlated with Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Results Significantly higher hearing threshold, higher approximate threshold and lower correct Gaps in Noise scores were observed in tinnitus ears. There was no significant correlation between psychoacoustic measures of tinnitus and Gaps in Noise test parameters of the tinnitus group.

Conclusion Auditory temporal resolution impairment was found in tinnitus patients, which could be attributed to cochlear impairment or altered neural firing within the auditory pathway. It is recommended to include temporal resolution testing in the tinnitus evaluation battery to provide a proper management planning.

  • References

  • 1 Jastreboff PJ. Phantom auditory perception (tinnitus): mechanisms of generation and perception. Neurosci Res 1990; 8 (04) 221-254
  • 2 Dobie RA. Overview: suffering from tinnitus. In: snow JB. ed. Tinnitus: theory and management. Ontario: Decker BC, Inc; 2004: 1-7
  • 3 Henry JA, Zaugg TL, Schechter MA. Clinical guide for audiologic tinnitus management I: Assessment. Am J Audiol 2005; 14 (01) 21-48
  • 4 Hoare DJ, Edmondson-Jones M, Gander PE, Hall DA. Agreement and reliability of tinnitus loudness matching and pitch likeness rating. PLoS ONE 2014; 9 (12) e114553
  • 5 Musiek FE, Shinn JB, Jirsa R, Bamiou DE, Baran JA, Zaida E. GIN (Gaps-In-Noise) test performance in subjects with confirmed central auditory nervous system involvement. Ear Hear 2005; 26 (06) 608-618
  • 6 Reed CM, Braida LD, Zurek PM. Review article: review of the literature on temporal resolution in listeners with cochlear hearing impairment: a critical assessment of the role of suprathreshold deficits. Trends Amplif 2009; 13 (01) 4-43
  • 7 Mehdizade Gilani V, Ruzbahani M, Mahdi P. , et al. Temporal processing evaluation in tinnitus patients: results on analysis of gap in noise and duration pattern test. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 25 (73) 221-226
  • 8 Sanches SGG, Samelli AG, Nishiyama AK, Sanchez TG, Carvallo RMM. GIN Test (Gaps-in-Noise) in normal listeners with and without tinnitus. Pro Fono 2010; 22 (03) 257-262
  • 9 Andersson G, McKenna L. The role of cognition in tinnitus. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2006; 126 (556) 39-43
  • 10 Gudwani S, Munjal SK, Panda NK, Verma RK. Correlation of tinnitus loudness and onset duration with audiological profile indicating variation in prognosis. ISRN Otolaryngol 2013; 2013: 205714
  • 11 Powers L, Ramirez T. . Clinical management of tinnitus [Internet]. Audiol Online 2014; Article ID 12558. Available at:
  • 12 De Ridder D, Congedo M, Vanneste S. The neural correlates of subjectively perceived and passively matched loudness perception in auditory phantom perception. Brain Behav 2015; 5 (05) e00331
  • 13 Shinn JB, Chermak GD, Musiek FE. GIN (Gaps-In-Noise) performance in the pediatric population. J Am Acad Audiol 2009; 20 (04) 229-238
  • 14 Kochkin S, Tyler R, Born J. . MarkeTrak VIII: The prevalence of tinnitus in the United States and the self-reported efficacy of various treatments. Hear Rev 2011: 10-26 . Available at:
  • 15 Kim H-J, Lee H-J, An S-Y. , et al. Analysis of the prevalence and associated risk factors of tinnitus in adults. PLoS ONE 2015; 10 (05) e0127578
  • 16 An Y-H, Jin SY, Yoon SW, Shim HJ. The effects of unilateral tinnitus on auditory temporal resolution: gaps-in-noise performance. Korean J Audiol 2014; 18 (03) 119-125
  • 17 Chen GD, Tanaka C, Henderson D. Relation between outer hair cell loss and hearing loss in rats exposed to styrene. Hear Res 2008; 243 (1–2): 28-34
  • 18 Gu JW, Herrmann BS, Levine RA, Melcher JR. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials suggest a role for the ventral cochlear nucleus in tinnitus. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2012; 13 (06) 819-833
  • 19 Schaette R, McAlpine D. Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model. J Neurosci 2011; 31 (38) 13452-13457
  • 20 Hickox AE, Liberman MC. Is noise-induced cochlear neuropathy key to the generation of hyperacusis or tinnitus?. J Neurophysiol 2014; 111 (03) 552-564
  • 21 Plack CJ, Barker D, Prendergast G. Perceptual consequences of “hidden” hearing loss. Trends Hear 2014; 18: 1-11
  • 22 Sanches SG, Sanchez TG, Carvallo RM. Influence of cochlear function on auditory temporal resolution in tinnitus patients. Audiol Neurootol 2010; 15 (05) 273-281
  • 23 Pichora-Fuller MK, Schneider BA, Macdonald E, Pass HE, Brown S. Temporal jitter disrupts speech intelligibility: a simulation of auditory aging. Hear Res 2007; 223 (1–2): 114-121
  • 24 Lopez-Poveda EA, Barrios P. Perception of stochastically undersampled sound waveforms: a model of auditory deafferentation. Front Neurosci 2013; 7 (124) 124
  • 25 Emadi M, Rezaei M, Najafi S, Faramarzi A, Farahani F. Comparison of the transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) and distortion products otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in normal hearing subjects with and without tinnitus. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; DOI: 10.1007/s12070-015-0824-9.
  • 26 Mokrian H, Shaibanizadeh A, Farahani S. , et al. Evaluation of distortion and transient evoked otoacoustic emission in tinnitus patients with normal hearing. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 26 (74) 19-24
  • 27 Bartels H, Staal MJ, Albers FWJ. Tinnitus and neural plasticity of the brain. Otol Neurotol 2007; 28 (02) 178-184