PDF herunterladen
CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Reconstr Microsurg Open 2017; 02(01): e37-e41
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1585087
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Remote Monitoring of Perforator Flaps Using an Innovative Device with an Application for Mobile Phone: A Pilot Study

Miguel de la Parra
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
,
Javier Montaño
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

25. April 2016

26. Mai 2016

Publikationsdatum:
13. April 2017 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background Surveillance and monitoring of perforator flaps has been well established for many years as a reliable method to detect early changes in the blood flow of the flap. In this manner, early flap revisions could be performed in cases of probable thrombosis.

Methods We performed a pilot study that included the first 12 patients to use this device. A temperature sensor electrode was used for remote monitoring of perforator flaps using a mobile phone in real time via a general pocket radio service and short messages developed by the authors, allowing the surgeon to check the temperature from any location.

Results The device continually displays the temperature of the flaps in real time performing a curve with measurements every 5 minute using the web page. A significant difference (p < 0.05) is shown between flaps with sufficient flow and flaps with venous thrombosis.

Conclusion Real-time direct thermography via the surgeon's mobile phone is a reliable method for flap monitoring, facilitating monitorization during the time when the surgeon is away from the hospital.

Keywords

perforator flaps - remote monitoring - mobile device
 

  • References

  • 1 Van Waes C, Seidenstuecker K, Mahajan A. , et al. The safety of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap procedure: a prospective analysis in 1036 breast reconstruction patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (4S): 57 . Doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000406278.04351.a7
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Furnas H, Rosen JM. Monitoring in microvascular surgery. Ann Plast Surg 1991; 26 (03) 265-272
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Halvorson E. The limited utility and high cost of implantable dopplers for head and neck free flap monitoring. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (5S): 13 . Doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000421712.97633.9f
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Setälä L, Koskenvuori H, Gudaviciene D, Berg L, Mustonen P. Cost analysis of 109 microsurgical reconstructions and flap monitoring with microdialysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2009; 25 (09) 521-526
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Neumeister MW. Free flap monitoring: keeping it simple and reliable. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (03) 1073-1074
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Goodson AM, Payne KF, Simmons J, Jain A. Free-flap telemonitoring to the surgeon's handheld device: proof of concept. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (05) 413-414
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Keller A. Noninvasive tissue oximetry for flap monitoring: an initial study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2007; 23 (04) 189-197
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Smit JM, Zeebregts CJ, Acosta R, Werker PM. Advancements in free flap monitoring in the last decade: a critical review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (01) 177-185
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Abe Y, Hashimoto I, Goishi K, Kashiwagi K, Yamano M, Nakanishi H. Transcutaneous PCO2 measurement at low temperature for reliable and continuous free flap monitoring: experimental and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2013; 1 (02) 1-8
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Swan MC, Wilson HA, McGuiness CN. Free flap temperature homeostasis during microsurgery: benefits of the “microsurgical duvet”. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (08) 561-564
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Kruse AL, Luebbers HT, Grätz KW, Obwegeser JA. Free flap monitoring protocol. J Craniofac Surg 2010; 21 (04) 1262-1263
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Hashimoto I, Nakanishi H, Takiwaki H, Takase MT, Yamano M, Sedo H. Flap monitoring by transcutaneous PO2 and PCO2: importance of transcutaneous PCO2 in determining follow-up treatment for compromised free flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2007; 23 (05) 269-274
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Lohman RF, Langevin CJ, Bozkurt M, Kundu N, Djohan R. A prospective analysis of free flap monitoring techniques: physical examination, external Doppler, implantable Doppler, and tissue oximetry. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (01) 51-56
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Chen Y, Shen Z, Shao Z, Yu P, Wu J. Free flap monitoring using near-infrared spectroscopy: a systemic review. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 76 (05) 590-597
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Sue GR, Kim R, Chen W, Narayan D. Real-time free flap monitoring using a standard video camera: a lower cost and simpler option?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (06) 905e-906e
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Kempton SJ, Chen J, Poore S, Afifi A. Abstract 96: the venous anastomotic flow-coupler for free flap monitoring: a prospective analysis of 85 microsurgical breast reconstruction cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (3, Suppl) 111 . Doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000444920.45830.5d
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Chen KT, Mardini S, Chuang DC. , et al. Timing of presentation of the first signs of vascular compromise dictates the salvage outcome of free flap transfers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (01) 187-195
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Wei FC, Jain V, Celik N, Chen HC, Chuang DC, Lin CH. Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (07) 2219-2226 , discussion 2227–2230
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Sakakibara S, Hashikawa K, Omori M, Terashi H, Tahara S. A simplest method of flap monitoring. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (07) 433-434
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar