AJP Rep 2016; 06(04): e407-e416
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593866
Case Report
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Clinical and Cost Impact Analysis of a Novel Prognostic Test for Early Detection of Preterm Birth

Aaron B. Caughey
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
John A. F. Zupancic
2   Department of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
James M. Greenberg
3   Division of Perinatal Institute and Neonatology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
Susan S. Garfield
4   GfK, Wayland, Massachusetts
Stephen F. Thung
5   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Jay D. Iams
5   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

11 April 2016

18 August 2016

Publication Date:
01 December 2016 (online)


Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential impact to the U.S. health care system by adopting a novel test that identifies women at risk for spontaneous preterm birth.

Methods A decision-analytic model was developed to assess clinical and cost outcomes over a 1-year period. The use of a prognostic test to predict spontaneous preterm birth in a hypothetical population of women reflective of the U.S. population (predictive arm) was compared with the current baseline rate of spontaneous preterm birth and associated infant morbidity and mortality (baseline care arm).

Results In a population of 3,528,593 births, our model predicts a 23.5% reduction in infant mortality (8,300 vs. 6,343 deaths) with use of the novel test. The rate of acute conditions at birth decreased from 11.2 to 8.1%; similarly, the rate of developmental disabilities decreased from 13.2 to 11.5%. The rate of spontaneous preterm birth decreased from 9.8 to 9.1%, a reduction of 23,430 preterm births. Direct medical costs savings was $511.7M (− 2.1%) in the first year of life.

Discussion The use of a prognostic test for reducing spontaneous preterm birth is a dominant strategy that could reduce costs and improve outcomes. More research is needed once such a test is available to determine if these results are borne out upon real-world use.

* At the time of writing, Dr. Garfield was employed by GfK. However, she has since moved to Ernst & Young and has received no financial compensation associated with the development or publication of this article.

Supplementary Material

  • References

  • 1 World Bank. Levels and Trends in Child Mortality: Estimates Developed by the UN Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (IGME). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group; 2014
  • 2 Goldenberg RL, Gravett MG, Iams J , et al. The preterm birth syndrome: issues to consider in creating a classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206 (2) 113-118
  • 3 Martin J, Hamilton B, Osterman M, Curtin S, Mathews T. Births: Final Data For 2013. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2015
  • 4 Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF , et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Trends in care practices, morbidity, and mortality of extremely preterm neonates, 1993-2012. JAMA 2015; 314 (10) 1039-1051
  • 5 Behrman R, Butler A. Preterm Birth. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2007
  • 6 Phibbs CS, Schmitt SK. Estimates of the cost and length of stay changes that can be attributed to one-week increases in gestational age for premature infants. Early Hum Dev 2006; 82 (2) 85-95
  • 7 Iams JD, Cebrik D, Lynch C, Behrendt N, Das A. The rate of cervical change and the phenotype of spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205 (2) 130.e1-130.e6
  • 8 Iams JD, Grobman WA, Lozitska A , et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. Adherence to criteria for transvaginal ultrasound imaging and measurement of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209 (4) 365.e1-365.e5
  • 9 Parry S, Elovitz MA. Pros and cons of maternal cervical length screening to identify women at risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2014; 57 (3) 537-546
  • 10 Berghella V, Blackwell S, Anderson B, Chauhan S, Copel J, Gyamfi C ; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Publications Committee, with assistance of Vincenzo Berghella. Progesterone and preterm birth prevention: translating clinical trials data into clinical practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206 (5) 376-386
  • 11 Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 130: prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120 (4) 964-973
  • 12 Orzechowski KM, Boelig RC, Baxter JK, Berghella V. A universal transvaginal cervical length screening program for preterm birth prevention. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124 (3) 520-525
  • 13 Laughon SK, Albert PS, Leishear K, Mendola P. The NICHD Consecutive Pregnancies Study: recurrent preterm delivery by subtype. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210 (2) 131.e1-131.e8
  • 14 U.S. Department of Commerce. American FactFinder - Results. Factfindercensusgov. 2015 . Available at: http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk . Accessed July 8, 2015
  • 15 Petrini JR, Callaghan WM, Klebanoff M , et al. Estimated effect of 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate on preterm birth in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105 (2) 267-272
  • 16 Romero R, Nicolaides K, Conde-Agudelo A , et al. Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206 (2) 124.e1-124.e19
  • 17 Center for Disease Control and Prevention.. Data Access - VitalStats - Homepage. Cdcgov. 2015 . Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/vitalstats.htm . Accessed July 8, 2015
  • 18 Genders TS, Meijboom WB, Meijs MF , et al. CT coronary angiography in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease: decision making from various perspectives in the face of uncertainty. Radiology 2009; 253 (3) 734-744
  • 19 National Institute for Children's Health Quality. NICHQ.Org | Collaborative Improvement and Innovation Network to Reduce Infant Mortality (IM CoIIN). Nichqorg. 2015 . Available at: http://www.nichq.org/childrens-health/infant-health/coiin-to-reduce-infant-mortality . Accessed October 23, 2015
  • 20 Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Maternal, Infant, and Child Health | Healthy People 2020. Healthypeoplegov. 2015 . Available at: https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/maternal-infant-and-child-health/objectives . Accessed November 16, 2015
  • 21 Meis PJ, Klebanoff M, Thom E , et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. N Engl J Med 2003; 348 (24) 2379-2385
  • 22 analysource.com. AnalySource - Your complete Drug Database and Analysis Power Tool.Www1analysourcecom. 2015 . Available at: https://www1.analysource.com/qry/as_products.taf?_nc=61d5a429673fe1cc012d9e5597286541 . Accessed November 30, 2015
  • 23 Goyal NK, Hall ES, Meinzen-Derr JK , et al. Dosage effect of prenatal home visiting on pregnancy outcomes in at-risk, first-time mothers. Pediatrics 2013; 132 (Suppl. 02) S118-S125
  • 24 Picklesimer AH, Billings D, Hale N, Blackhurst D, Covington-Kolb S. The effect of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care on preterm birth in a low-income population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206 (5) 415.e1-415.e7
  • 25 Delobel-Ayoub M, Kaminski M, Marret S , et al; EPIPAGE Study Group. Behavioral outcome at 3 years of age in very preterm infants: the EPIPAGE study. Pediatrics 2006; 117 (6) 1996-2005
  • 26 Pryhuber GS, Maitre NL, Ballard RA , et al; Prematurity and Respiratory Outcomes Program Investigators. Prematurity and respiratory outcomes program (PROP): study protocol of a prospective multicenter study of respiratory outcomes of preterm infants in the United States. BMC Pediatr 2015; 15 (1) 37
  • 27 Smith PB, Ambalavanan N, Li L , et al; Generic Database Subcommittee; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Approach to infants born at 22 to 24 weeks' gestation: relationship to outcomes of more-mature infants. Pediatrics 2012; 129 (6) e1508-e1516
  • 28 Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008; Jan 5; 371 (9606): 75-84
  • 29 Cahill A, Odibo A, Caughey A , et al. Universal cervical length screening and treatment with vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth: a decision and economic analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2010; 202 (6) 548.e1-548.e8
  • 30 Larroque B, Ancel P, Marret S , et al. Neurodevelopmental disabilities and special care of 5-year-old children born before 33 weeks of gestation (the EPIPAGE study): a longitudinal cohort study. The Lancet 2008; 371 (9615): 813-820
  • 31 van Dommelen P, Verkerk P, van Straaten H. Hearing Loss by Week of Gestation and Birth Weight in Very Preterm Neonates. The Journal of Pediatrics 2015; 166 (4) 840-843.e1
  • 32 Stoll B, Hansen N, Bell E , et al. Neonatal Outcomes of Extremely Preterm Infants From the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. PEDIATRICS 2010; 126 (3) 443-456
  • 33 Underwood M, Danielsen B, Gilbert W. Cost, causes and rates of rehospitalization of preterm infants. Journal of Perinatology 2007; 27 (10) 614-619