Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2018; 31(01): 036-040
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1602178
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Management of Destructive Colon Injuries after Damage Control Surgery

Jad Chamieh
1   Section of Acute and Critical Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
,
Priya Prakash
2   Section of Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
William J. Symons
1   Section of Acute and Critical Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 December 2017 (online)

Abstract

After the World War II, fecal diversion became the standard of care for colon injuries, although medical, logistic, and technical advancements have challenged this approach. Damage control surgery serves to temporize immediately life-threatening conditions, and definitive management of destructive colon injuries is delayed until after appropriate resuscitation. The bowel can be left in discontinuity for up to 3 days before edema ensues, but the optimal repair window remains within 12 to 48 hours. Delayed anastomosis performed at the take-back operation or stoma formation has been reported with variable results. Studies have revealed good outcomes in those undergoing anastomosis after damage control surgery; however, they point to a subgroup of trauma patients considered to be “high risk” that may benefit from fecal diversion. Risk factors influencing morbidity and mortality rates include hypotension, massive transfusion, the degree of intra-abdominal contamination, associated organ injuries, shock, left-sided colon injury, and multiple comorbid conditions. Patients who are not suitable for anastomosis by 36 hours after damage control may be best managed with a diverting stoma. Failures are more likely related to ongoing instability, and the management strategy of colorectal injury should be based mainly on the patient's overall condition.

 
  • References

  • 1 Choi WJ. Management of colorectal trauma. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2011; 27 (04) 166-172
  • 2 Demetriades D. Colon injuries: new perspectives. Injury 2004; 35 (03) 217-222
  • 3 Bennett JD. Abdominal surgery in war--the early story. J R Soc Med 1991; 84 (09) 554-557
  • 4 Derby AC. Wounds of the abdomen. Part 1: In war. Can J Surg 1988; 31 (04) 213-218
  • 5 Bowlby A, Wallace C. The development of British surgery at the front. BMJ 1917; 1 (2944): 705-721
  • 6 Rignault DP. Abdominal trauma in war. World J Surg 1992; 16 (05) 940-946
  • 7 Ogilvie WH. Abdominal wounds in the Western Desert. Bull US Army Med Dep 1946; 6 (04) 435-445
  • 8 Miller PR, Fabian TC, Croce MA. , et al. Improving outcomes following penetrating colon wounds: application of a clinical pathway. Ann Surg 2002; 235 (06) 775-781
  • 9 Ogilvie WH. Surgical lessons of war applied to civil practice. BMJ 1945; 1 (4400): 619-623
  • 10 Carrillo EH, Somberg LB, Ceballos CE. , et al. Blunt traumatic injuries to the colon and rectum. J Am Coll Surg 1996; 183 (06) 548-552
  • 11 Stewart RM, Rosenthal D. Colorectal trauma. In: Corman ML. , ed. Colon and Rectal Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005: 427-449
  • 12 Johnson EK, Steele SR. Evidence-based management of colorectal trauma. J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 17 (09) 1712-1719
  • 13 Cleary RK, Pomerantz RA, Lampman RM. Colon and rectal injuries. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49 (08) 1203-1222
  • 14 Lee E. Traumatic injuries. In: Gordon PH. , ed. Principles and Practice of Surgery for the Colon, Rectum and Anus. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishers; 1999: 1235-1261
  • 15 Ng AK, Simons RK, Torreggiani WC, Ho SG, Kirkpatrick AW, Brown DR. Intra-abdominal free fluid without solid organ injury in blunt abdominal trauma: an indication for laparotomy. J Trauma 2002; 52 (06) 1134-1140
  • 16 Miller BJ, Schache DJ. Colorectal injury: where do we stand with repair?. Aust N Z J Surg 1996; 66 (06) 348-352
  • 17 Cirocchi R, Abraha I, Montedori A. , et al. Damage control surgery for abdominal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (01) CD007438
  • 18 Stone HH, Fabian TC. Management of perforating colon trauma: randomization between primary closure and exteriorization. Ann Surg 1979; 190 (04) 430-436
  • 19 Miller PR, Chang MC, Hoth JJ, Holmes IV JH, Meredith JW. Colonic resection in the setting of damage control laparotomy: is delayed anastomosis safe?. Am Surg 2007; 73 (06) 606-609 , discussion 609–610
  • 20 Vertrees A, Wakefield M, Pickett C. , et al. Outcomes of primary repair and primary anastomosis in war-related colon injuries. J Trauma 2009; 66 (05) 1286-1291
  • 21 Kashuk JL, Cothren CC, Moore EE, Johnson JL, Biffl WL, Barnett CC. Primary repair of civilian colon injuries is safe in the damage control scenario. Surgery 2009; 146 (04) 663-668 , discussion 668–670
  • 22 Weinberg JA, Griffin RL, Vandromme MJ. , et al. Management of colon wounds in the setting of damage control laparotomy: a cautionary tale. J Trauma 2009; 67 (05) 929-935
  • 23 Ott MM, Norris PR, Diaz JJ. , et al. Colon anastomosis after damage control laparotomy: recommendations from 174 trauma colectomies. J Trauma 2011; 70 (03) 595-602
  • 24 Ordoñez CA, Pino LF, Badiel M. , et al. Safety of performing a delayed anastomosis during damage control laparotomy in patients with destructive colon injuries. J Trauma 2011; 71 (06) 1512-1517 , discussion 1517–1518
  • 25 Georgoff P, Perales P, Laguna B, Holena D, Reilly P, Sims C. Colonic injuries and the damage control abdomen: does management strategy matter?. J Surg Res 2013; 181 (02) 293-299
  • 26 Burlew CC, Moore EE, Cuschieri J. , et al; WTA Study Group. Sew it up! A Western Trauma Association multi-institutional study of enteric injury management in the postinjury open abdomen. J Trauma 2011; 70 (02) 273-277
  • 27 Bulger EM, McMahon K, Jurkovich GJ. The morbidity of penetrating colon injury. Injury 2003; 34 (01) 41-46
  • 28 Crass RA, Salbi F, Trunkey DD. Colostomy closure after colon injury: a low-morbidity procedure. J Trauma 1987; 27 (11) 1237-1239
  • 29 Livingston DH, Miller FB, Richardson JD. Are the risks after colostomy closure exaggerated?. Am J Surg 1989; 158 (01) 17-20
  • 30 Pachter HL, Hoballah JJ, Corcoran TA, Hofstetter SR. The morbidity and financial impact of colostomy closure in trauma patients. J Trauma 1990; 30 (12) 1510-1513
  • 31 Anjaria DJ, Ullmann TM, Lavery R, Livingston DH. Management of colonic injuries in the setting of damage-control laparotomy: one shot to get it right. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014; 76 (03) 594-598 , discussion 598–600
  • 32 Adesanya AA, Ekanem EE. A ten-year study of penetrating injuries of the colon. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47 (12) 2169-2177
  • 33 Murray JA, Demetriades D, Colson M. , et al. Colonic resection in trauma: colostomy versus anastomosis. J Trauma 1999; 46 (02) 250-254
  • 34 Thompson JS, Moore EE, Moore JB. Comparison of penetrating injuries of the right and left colon. Ann Surg 1981; 193 (04) 414-418
  • 35 Fealk M, Osipov R, Foster K, Caruso D, Kassir A. The conundrum of traumatic colon injury. Am J Surg 2004; 188 (06) 663-670
  • 36 Steele SR, Wolcott KE, Mullenix PS. , et al. Colon and rectal injuries during Operation Iraqi Freedom: are there any changing trends in management or outcome?. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50 (06) 870-877
  • 37 Steele SR, Maykel JA, Johnson EK. Traumatic injury of the colon and rectum: the evidence vs dogma. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54 (09) 1184-1201