Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2017; 39(11): 622-631
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604103
Systematic Review
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Preterm Preeclampsia and Timing of Delivery: A Systematic Literature Review[*]

Pré-eclâmpsia pré-termo e o melhor momento para a resolução da gestação: revisão sistemática da literatura*
José Paulo de Siqueira Guida
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
,
Fernanda Garanhani Surita
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
,
Mary Angela Parpinelli
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
,
Maria Laura Costa
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

08 December 2016

18 May 2017

Publication Date:
12 July 2017 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Preeclampsia, a multifactorial disease with pathophysiology not yet fully understood, is a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, especially when preterm. The diagnosis is performed when there is an association between arterial hypertension and proteinuria or evidence of severity. There are unanswered questions in the literature considering the timing of delivery once preterm preeclampsia has been diagnosed, given the risk of developing maternal complications versus the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes associated with prematurity. The objective of this systematic review is to determine the best timing of delivery for women diagnosed with preeclampsia before 37 weeks of gestation.

Methods Systematic literature review, performed in the PubMed database, using the terms preeclampsia, parturition and timing of delivery to look for studies conducted between 2014 and 2017. Studies that compared the maternal and perinatal outcomes of women who underwent immediate delivery or delayed delivery, in the absence of evidence of severe preeclampsia, were selected.

Results A total of 629 studies were initially retrieved. After reading the titles, 78 were selected, and their abstracts, evaluated; 16 were then evaluated in full and, in the end, 6 studies (2 randomized clinical trials and 4 observational studies) met the inclusion criteria. The results were presented according to gestational age range (< 34 weeks and between 34 and 37 weeks) and by maternal and perinatal outcomes, according to the timing of delivery, considering immediate delivery or expectant management. Before 34 weeks, the maternal outcomes were similar, but the perinatal outcomes were significantly worse when immediate delivery occurred. Between 34 and 37 weeks, the progression to severe maternal disease was slightly higher among women undergoing expectant management, however, with better perinatal outcomes.

Conclusions When there is no evidence of severe preeclampsia or impaired fetal well-being, especially before 34 weeks, the pregnancy should be carefully surveilled, and the delivery, postponed, aiming at improving the perinatal outcomes. Between 34 and 37 weeks, the decision on the timing of delivery should be shared with the pregnant woman and her family, after providing information regarding the risks of adverse outcomes associated with preeclampsia and prematurity.

Resumo

Introdução A pré-eclâmpsia, doença multifatorial e com fisiopatologia ainda não totalmente estabelecida, é importante causa de morbimortalidade materna e perinatal, especialmente quando pré-termo. O diagnóstico é realizado quando há associação entre hipertensão arterial e proteinúria ou evidência de gravidade. Existem questionamentos na literatura se, frente ao diagnóstico de pré-eclâmpsia, a resolução da gravidez deve ser imediata ou postergada, considerando o risco de desenvolvimento de complicações maternas versus os resultados perinatais associados à prematuridade. O objetivo desta revisão sistemática é estabelecer o melhor momento de resolução da gestação em mulheres com pré-eclâmpsia antes das 37 semanas.

Metodologia Revisão sistemática da literatura, realizada na base de dados PubMed, usando os termos preeclampsia parturition e timing of delivery, para encontrar estudos feitos entre 2014 a 2017. Foram selecionados estudos que comparassem os desfechos maternos e perinatais de mulheres submetidas a resolução imediata ou a postergação do parto, na ausência de evidência de pré-eclâmpsia grave.

Resultados Foram localizados 629 artigos; após leitura dos títulos, 78 foram selecionados. Realizada avaliação dos seus resumos, 16 foram avaliados na integralmente e, finalmente, 6 estudos preencheram os requisitos de inclusão (2 ensaios clínicos randomizados e 4 estudos observacionais). Os resultados foram apresentados conforme a faixa de idade gestacional (≤ 34 semanas, e entre 34 e 37 semanas) e a avaliação dos desfechos maternos e perinatais. Antes das 34 semanas, os resultados maternos foram semelhantes; entretanto, os desfechos perinatais foram significativamente piores quando houve resolução imediata. Entre 34 e 37 semanas, a progressão para doença materna grave foi discretamente maior entre as mulheres submetidas a conduta expectante; entretanto, os desfechos perinatais foram melhores quando o parto foi postergado.

Conclusões Na ausência de evidências de pré-eclâmpsia grave ou de prejuízo da vitalidade fetal, o parto deve ser postergado, principalmente antes das 34 semanas, com vigilância materna e fetal rigorosas. Entre 34 e 37 semanas, a decisão deve ser compartilhada com a gestante e sua família, após esclarecimento sobre os desfechos adversos associados à pré-eclâmpsia e prematuridade.

Keywords

preeclampsia - delivery - prematurity - preterm preeclampsia

Palavras-Chave

pré-eclâmpsia - parto - prematuridade - pré-eclâmpsia pré-termo

Contributions

The theme of this systematic review was defined by the Specialized Preeclampsia Committee. JPG and MLC performed the systematic literature review (independent assessment), and extracted data from each article included. FGS acted as a third reviewer, when there were any issues concerning the selection of the studies. JPG wrote the first version of the manuscript. MLC, MAP and FGS reviewed the first version, and then incorporated the suggestions from the other co-authors and members of the Specialized Preeclampsia Committee. All authors read and agreed with the final version of the article.


* This revision is part of the Project Series, Guidelines and Recommendations of the Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia – FEBRASGO, elaborated by the Specialized National Committees in Hypertension in Pregnancy.


 

  • References

  • 1 Duley L. The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Semin Perinatol 2009; 33 (03) 130-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A. , et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2014; 2 (06) e323-e333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Giordano JC, Parpinelli MA, Cecatti JG. , et al. The burden of eclampsia: results from a multicenter study on surveillance of severe maternal morbidity in Brazil. PLoS One 2014; 9 (05) e97401
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Tranquilli AL, Dekker G, Magee L. , et al. The classification, diagnosis and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A revised statement from the ISSHP. Pregnancy Hypertens 2014; 4 (02) 97-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Lowe SA, Brown MA, Dekker GA. , et al; Society of Obstetric Medicine of Australia and New Zealand. Guidelines for the management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy 2008. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 49 (03) 242-246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Steegers EA, von Dadelszen P, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2010; 376 (9741): 631-644
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Phipps E, Prasanna D, Brima W, Jim B. Preeclampsia: Updates in Pathogenesis, Definitions, and Guidelines. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2016; 11 (06) 1102-1113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Brosens I. A study of the spiral arteries of the decidua basalis in normotensive and hypertensive pregnancies. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1964; 71: 222-230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Roberts JM, Taylor RN, Musci TJ, Rodgers GM, Hubel CA, McLaughlin MK. Preeclampsia: an endothelial cell disorder. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161 (05) 1200-1204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Roberts JM, Hubel CA. The two stage model of preeclampsia: variations on the theme. Placenta 2009; 30 (Suppl A): S32-S37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM, Vogel J. , et al. Moving beyond essential interventions for reduction of maternal mortality (the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health): a cross-sectional study. Lancet 2013; 381 (9879): 1747-1755
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Newman MG, Robichaux AG, Stedman CM. , et al. Perinatal outcomes in preeclampsia that is complicated by massive proteinuria. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188 (01) 264-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Pettit F, Mangos G, Davis G, Henry A, Brown MA. Pre-eclampsia causes adverse maternal outcomes across the gestational spectrum. Pregnancy Hypertens 2015; 5 (02) 198-204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Lisonkova S, Sabr Y, Mayer C, Young C, Skoll A, Joseph KS. Maternal morbidity associated with early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124 (04) 771-781
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Vogel JP, Souza JP, Mori R. , et al; WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health Research Network. Maternal complications and perinatal mortality: findings of the World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. BJOG 2014; 121 (Suppl. 01) 76-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Delorme P, Goffinet F, Ancel PY. , et al. Cause of Preterm Birth as a Prognostic Factor for Mortality. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127 (01) 40-48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008; 371 (9606): 75-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Chappell LC, Milne F, Shennan A. Is early induction or expectant management more beneficial in women with late preterm pre-eclampsia?. BMJ 2015; 350: h191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Koopmans CM, Bijlenga D, Groen H. , et al; HYPITAT study group. Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks' gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009; 374 (9694): 979-988
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 O'Sullivan D, Wilk S, Michalowski W, Farion K. Using PICO to align medical evidence with MDs decision making models. Stud Health Technol Inform 2013; 192: 1057
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J. , et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009; 339: b2700
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Helou A, Walker S, Stewart K, George J. Management of pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: Could we do better?. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2016
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 McKinney D, Boyd H, Langager A, Oswald M, Pfister A, Warshak CR. The impact of fetal growth restriction on latency in the setting of expectant management of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214 (03) 395.e1-395.e7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Broekhuijsen K, van Baaren GJ, van Pampus MG. , et al; HYPITAT-II study group. Immediate delivery versus expectant monitoring for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation (HYPITAT-II): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 385 (9986): 2492-2501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Owens MY, Thigpen B, Parrish MR. , et al. Management of preeclampsia when diagnosed between 34-37 weeks gestation: deliver now or deliberate until 37 weeks?. J Miss State Med Assoc 2014; 55 (07) 208-211
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Churchill D, Duley L, Thornton JG, Jones L. Interventionist versus expectant care for severe pre-eclampsia between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (07) CD003106
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Cluver C, Novikova N, Koopmans CM, West HM. Planned early delivery versus expectant management for hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks gestation to term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 1: CD009273
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Seely EW, Ecker J. Chronic hypertension in pregnancy. Circulation 2014; 129 (11) 1254-1261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Morisaki N, Togoobaatar G, Vogel JP. , et al; WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health Research Network. Risk factors for spontaneous and provider-initiated preterm delivery in high and low Human Development Index countries: a secondary analysis of the World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. BJOG 2014; 121 (Suppl. 01) 101-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Wang Y, Hao M, Sampson S, Xia J. Elective delivery versus expectant management for pre-eclampsia: a meta-analysis of RCTs. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 295 (03) 607-622
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Duley L, Gülmezoglu AM, Henderson-Smart DJ, Chou D. Magnesium sulphate and other anticonvulsants for women with pre-eclampsia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (11) CD000025
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 McDonald SD, Lutsiv O, Dzaja N, Duley L. A systematic review of maternal and infant outcomes following magnesium sulfate for pre-eclampsia/eclampsia in real-world use. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012; 118 (02) 90-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Lotufo FA, Parpinelli MA, Osis MJ, Surita FG, Costa ML, Cecatti JG. Situational analysis of facilitators and barriers to availability and utilization of magnesium sulfate for eclampsia and severe preeclampsia in the public health system in Brazil. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016; 16: 254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Jacquemyn Y, Zecic A, Van Laere D, Roelens K. The use of intravenous magnesium in non-preeclamptic pregnant women: fetal/neonatal neuroprotection. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 291 (05) 969-975
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Locatelli A, Consonni S, Ghidini A. Preterm labor: approach to decreasing complications of prematurity. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2015; 42 (02) 255-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Pryde PG, Mittendorf R. Using prophylactic, but not tocolytic, magnesium sulfate to reduce cerebral palsy related to prematurity: what dose, and what about infant mortality?. J Perinat Med 2011; 39 (04) 375-378
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Acharya A, Brima W, Burugu S, Rege T. Prediction of preeclampsia-bench to bedside. Curr Hypertens Rep 2014; 16 (11) 491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Hagmann H, Thadhani R, Benzing T, Karumanchi SA, Stepan H. The promise of angiogenic markers for the early diagnosis and prediction of preeclampsia. Clin Chem 2012; 58 (05) 837-845
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Anderson UD, Gram M, Åkerström B, Hansson SR. First trimester prediction of preeclampsia. Curr Hypertens Rep 2015; 17 (09) 584
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Klein E, Schlembach D, Ramoni A. , et al. Influence of the sFlt-1/PlGF Ratio on Clinical Decision-Making in Women with Suspected Preeclampsia. PLoS One 2016; 11 (05) e0156013
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Verlohren S, Galindo A, Schlembach D. , et al. An automated method for the determination of the sFlt-1/PIGF ratio in the assessment of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202 (02) 161.e1-161.e11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Verlohren S, Herraiz I, Lapaire O. , et al. The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in different types of hypertensive pregnancy disorders and its prognostic potential in preeclamptic patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206 (01) 58.e1-58.e8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Giannubilo SR, Landi B, Ciavattini A. Preeclampsia: what could happen in a subsequent pregnancy?. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2014; 69 (12) 747-762
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Melamed N, Hadar E, Peled Y, Hod M, Wiznitzer A, Yogev Y. Risk for recurrence of preeclampsia and outcome of subsequent pregnancy in women with preeclampsia in their first pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25 (11) 2248-2251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 van Oostwaard MF, Langenveld J, Schuit E. , et al. Recurrence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: an individual patient data metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212 (05) 624.e1-624.e17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Costa ML. Preeclampsia: Reflections on How to Counsel About Preventing Recurrence. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2015; 37 (10) 887-893
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Lee G, Tubby J. Preeclampsia and the risk of cardiovascular disease later in life--A review of the evidence. Midwifery 2015; 31 (12) 1127-1134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Charlton F, Tooher J, Rye KA, Hennessy A. Cardiovascular risk, lipids and pregnancy: preeclampsia and the risk of later life cardiovascular disease. Heart Lung Circ 2014; 23 (03) 203-212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Seely EW, Tsigas E, Rich-Edwards JW. Preeclampsia and future cardiovascular disease in women: How good are the data and how can we manage our patients?. Semin Perinatol 2015; 39 (04) 276-283
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Facca TA, Kirsztajn GM, Sass N. Preeclampsia (marker of chronic kidney disease): from genesis to future risks. J Bras Nefrol 2012; 34 (01) 87-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 van der Graaf AM, Toering TJ, Faas MM, Lely AT. From preeclampsia to renal disease: a role of angiogenic factors and the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system?. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27 (Suppl. 03) iii51-iii57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Browne JL, Vissers KM, Antwi E. , et al. Perinatal outcomes after hypertensive disorders in pregnancy in a low resource setting. Trop Med Int Health 2015; 20 (12) 1778-1786
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar