Distinction between Planned and Unplanned Readmissions following Discharge from a Department of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Readmission rate is often used as an indicator for the quality of care. However, only unplanned readmissions may have a link with substandard quality of care. We compared two databases of the Geneva University Hospitals to determine which information is needed to distinguish planned from unplanned readmissions. All patients readmitted within 42 days after a first stay in the wards of the Department of Internal Medicine were identified. One of the databases contained encoded information needed to compute DRGs. The other database consisted of full-text discharge reports, addressed to the referring physician. Encoded reports allowed the classification of 64% of the readmissions, whereas full-text reports could classify 97% of the readmissions (p <0.001). The concordance between encoded reports and full-text reports was fair (kappa = 0.40). We conclude that encoded reports alone are not sufficient to distinguish planned from unplanned readmissions and that the automation of detailed clinical databases seems promising.

Keywords

Health Services Research - Patient Data Collection - Readmissions - Hospital Information Systems

• References

• 1 Thomas J, Holloway J. Investigating early readmission as an indicator for quality of care studies. Med Care 1991; 29: 377-94.
• 2 Ashton CM, Wray NP. A conceptual framework for the study of early readmission as an indicator of quality of care. Soc Sci Med 1996; 43: 1533-41.
• 3 DesHarnais SI, McMahon Jr LF, Wroblewski RT, Hogan AJ. Measuring hospital performance. The development and validation of risk-adjusted indexes of mortality, readmissions, and complications. Med Care 1990; 28: 1127-41.
• 4 Wray NP, Ashton CM, Kuykendall DH, Petersen NJ, Souchek J, Hollingworth JC. Selecting disease-outcome pairs for monitoring the quality of hospital care. Med Care 1995; 33 : 75-89.
• 5 Patterson L, Weiss H, Schano P. Combining multiple databases for outcome assessment. Am J Med Qual 1996; 11: S73-7.
• 6 Jollis J, Ancukiewicz M, Long ED, Pryor D, Muhlbaier L, Mark D. Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems. Implications for outcome research. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119: 844-50.
• 7 Clarke A. Are readmissions avoidable?. Br Med J 1990; 301: 1136-8.
• 8 Reed RL, Pearlman RA, Buchner DM. Risk factors for early unplanned hospital read-mission in the elderly. J Gen Intern Med 1991; 6: 223-8.
• 9 Ludke R, Booth B, Lewis-Beck J. Relationship between early readmission and hospital quality of care indicators. Inquiry 1993; 30: 95-103.
• 10 Michel PA, Lovis C, Baud RH. LUCID: Semiautomated ICD-9 encoding system. In: Greenes, Peterson, Protti, eds. MEDINFO ’95. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress of Medical Informatics. Vancouver: Health Care Computing and Communication; 1995: 1656.
• 11 Scherrer JR, Revillard C, Borst F, Berthoud M, Lovis C. Medical office automation integrated into the distributed architecture of the HIS-DIOGENE 2. Meth Inf Med 1994; 33: 174-9.
• 12 Borst F, Griesser V, Rossier P, Bourdilloud R, Scherrer JR. Fifteen years of medical encoding in the DIOGENE HIS. In: Greenes, Peterson, Protti, eds. MEDINFO ’95. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Medical Informatics. Vancouver: Health Care Computing and Communication; 1995: 43-6.
• 13 Simborg DW. DRG creep: A new hospital-acquired disease. N Engl J Med 1981; 304: 1602-4.
• 14 Jenks SF, Williams DK, Kay TL. Assessing hospital associated deaths from discharge data. The role of length of stay and comorbidities. JAMA 1988; 260: 2240-6.
• 15 Iezzoni LI. Assessing quality using administrative data. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127: 666-74.
• 16 Ashton CM, delJunco DJ, Souchek J, Wray NP, Mansyur CL. The association between the quality of inpatient care and early read-missions: A meta-analysis of the evidence. Med Care 1997; 35: 1044-59.