Cognitive Tools in Medical Teamwork: The Spatial Arrangement of Patient Records

Summary

Objectives: As a preliminary for the design of Computer-Based Patient Records, the aim of this paper is to build an understanding of the roles physical artifacts like paper-based patient records play in supporting cognition and collaboration in the health-care settings.

Method: A small ethnographically-informed study was conducted in the emergency room at a 250-bed hospital in Sweden from the perspective of Distributed Cognition.

Results: To track work-in-progress, clinicians placed patient records on a desk to form a shared public display that represented the current problem state for the health-care team. The results of the study suggest that the patient records and other physical artifacts are used by clinicians in different ways to form cognitive tools that offload memory tasks and support joint attention and collaboration.

Conclusion: To design Computer-Based Patient Records that more appropriately support cognition and teamwork, it is important to investigate how clinicians make use of the paper-based patient records. Practitioners take advantage of existing tools frequently to deal with cognitively demanding tasks and collaboration issues.

Keywords

Cognitive artifacts - distributed cognition - information systems design - computer-based patient records - cooperative work

• References

• 1 Dick RS, Steen EB, Detmer DE. The Computer-based patient record, an Essential Technology for health care. Revised ed. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1997
• 2 Berg M. Medical work and the computer-based patient record, a sociological perspective. Methods Inf Med 1998; 37: 294-301.
• 3 McDonald CJ. The barriers to electronic medical record systems and how to overcome them. J Med Inf Assoc 1997; 4: 213-21.
• 4 Rind DM, Safran C. Real and imagined barriers to an electronic medical record. Seventeenth Annual Symp Comp Applic Med Care. 1994: 74-8.
• 5 Levitt JI. Why physicians continue to reject the computerized medical record. Minn Med 1994; 77: 17-21.
• 6 Kaplan B. The medical computing ‘lag’, perceptions of barriers to the application of computers to medicine. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health and Care 1987; 3: 123-37.
• 7 Luff P, Heath C, Greatbatch D. Tasks-in-interaction: paper and screen based documentation in collaborative activity. Proceedings of CSCW’92. 1992: 163-70.
• 8 Lundberg N, Sandahl TI. What do artifacts mean to us in work?. In: Käkölä TK. editor. Proceedings of the 22nd Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (IRIS 22). University of Jyväskylä; Finland: 1999. pp. 363-72.
• 9 Callon M. Some elements of a sociology of translation, domestication of scallops and fishermen. In: Law J. editor. Power, action and belief, a new sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1986
• 10 Hutchins E. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1995
• 11 Hutchins E. Learning to navigate. In: Chaiklin S, Lave J. editors. Understanding practice, perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993. pp. 35-63.
• 12 Norman D. Things that make us smart: defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley; 1993
• 13 Norman D. Cognitive Artifacts. In: Carroll JM. editor. Designing interaction: psychology at the human-computer Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991. pp. 17-38.
• 14 Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development, experiments by nature and design. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1979
• 15 Cole M. Cultural psychology, once and future discipline. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1996
• 16 Lave J. Cognition in practice: mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988
• 17 Suchman L. Plans and situated Actions, the problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987
• 18 Nardi BA. Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1996
• 19 Bannon LJ, Kaptelinin V. From human-computer interaction to computer-mediated activity. In: Stephanidis C. editor. User interfaces for all: concepts, methods, and tools. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001
• 20 Klein G, Oransanu J, Calderwood R. Decision making in action, models and methods. Nor-wood (NJ): Ablex Publishing Corporation; 1992
• 21 Wertsch J. Mind as action. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998
• 22 Star SL. Working together: symbolic interactionism, activity theory, and information systems. In: Engeström Y, Middleton D. editors. Cognition and Communication at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. pp. 296-318.
• 23 Resnick B, Levine JM, Teasley SD. Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 1991
• 24 Nyce JM, Timpka T. Work, knowledge and argument in specialist consultations: incorporating tacit knowledge into the systems design and development. Medical & Biological Engineering and Computing 1993; 31: HTA16-HTA19.
• 25 Agre P, Chapman D. PENGI: An implementation of a theory of activity. Proceedings of the Sixth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-87). 1987: 268-72.
• 26 Garfinkel H. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood-Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1967
• 27 Kirsh D. The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence 1995; 72: 1-52.
• 28 Kirsh D. The context of work. Human Computer Interaction 2001; 16: 305-22.
• 29 Harrison S, Dourish P. Re-place-ing space, the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. Proceedings of CSCW’96. 1996: 67-76.
• 30 Kirlik A. Requirements for psychological models to support design, toward ecological task analysis. In: Flach P, Hancock P, Caird J, Vincente K. editors. Global perspectives on the ecology of human machine systems. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1995. pp. 68-120.
• 31 Blomberg J, Giacomi J, Mosher A, Swenton-Wall P. Ethnographic field methods and their relation to design. In: Schuler D, Namioka A. editors. Participatory design, principles and practices. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1993
• 32 Simon H. Sciences of the artificial. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1969
• 33 Zhang J, Norman DA. Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science 1994; 18: 87-122.
• 34 Larkin JH. Display-Based problem solving. In: Klahr D, Kotovsky K. editors. Complex information processing, the impact of Herbert A. Simon. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1989
• 35 Goodwin C. Professional vision. American Anthropologist 1994; 96: 606-33.
• 36 Cook RI, Woods DD. Adapting to new technology in the operating room. Human Factors 1996; 38: 593-613.
• 37 Bång M, Hagdahl A, Eriksson H, Timpka T. Groupware for case Management and inter-organizational collaboration, the virtual rehabilitation team. In: Patel VL, Rogers R, Haux R. editors. Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Medical Informatics; 2001 Sep 2-5; London, England. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2001. pp. 3-7.
• 38 Bång M, Eriksson H, Timpka T. Supporting cognition in inter-organizational collaborative systems. Fifth International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems 2002. June 3-6; Saint Raphaël; France.:
• 39 Anoto AB. Available from URL: www.anoto.com (accessed May 1, 2002).
• 40 Woods DD, Roth EM. Cognitive engineering: human problem solving with tools. Human Factors 1988; 30: 415-30.