Methods Inf Med 2000; 39(02): 138-141
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634276
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Estimation of Scale Factors in Presence of Multiple Signals: Application to sEMG Analysis

O. Meste
1   Lab. I3S, Sophia Antipolis, France
,
W. Muhammad
1   Lab. I3S, Sophia Antipolis, France
,
H. Rix
1   Lab. I3S, Sophia Antipolis, France
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
07. Februar 2018 (online)

Abstract:

When several realizations of an unknown recurrent signal are observed apart from a time expansion or compression, the classical way of estimating these time scaling factors is to take one signal as reference for the estimation. This approach does not take into account the common information between all possible couples of realizations. To achieve this task we use a Maximum-Likelihood based method, in a sub-optimal manner. Using some realistic assumptions and simplifications, we propose a tractable solution. The improvement of classical results is shown through a simulation whose conclusion is that the larger the number of realizations, the more correct the estimation. Finally, we apply the method to electrically evoked sEMG.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Cohen L. The scale representation. IEEE Trans. On Signal Processing. Vol. 41, pp 3275-92 1993
  • 2 Gupta L, Molfese DL, Tammana R, Simos PG. Nonlinear alignment and averaging for estimating the evoked potential. IEEE Trans on Biomedical Engineering 1996; 43: 348-56.
  • 3 Jacovitti G, Scarano G. Discrete time techniques for time delay estimation. IEEE Trans on Signal Processing 1993; 41: 525-33.
  • 4 Laguna P, Jane R, Olmos S, Thakor NV, Rix H, Caminal P. Adaptive estimation of QRS complex wave features of ECG signals by the Hermite model. Med Biol Eng Comput 1996; 34: 58-68.
  • 5 Laterza F, Lo Presti L, Merletti R, Olmo G. Morphological classification and fatigue index of electrically evoked sEMG by means of adaptive Hermite model estimation system (AHMES). World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering. Nice, September 1997: 560.
  • 6 Meste O, Pronzato L. Comparison of two methods for estimating multiple time delays. Internal report. RR-98-09, Lab. I3S, University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis, France.
  • 7 Söderström T, Stoica P. System identification. Prentice Hall; 1989